NOTE: Signing of the RC4 tree is not yet complete, there are technical
issues in releng preventing it working. To strictly be sure we're
testing the right bits we should remember to check that the images we
test match the signed checksum files once they're available, and of
course you can
Compose started at Wed Dec 3 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[openstack-nova]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 3.12.2014 v 08:47 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
At the risk of jumping in, here's my own 2 cents on the subject...
On 12/03/2014 12:30 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 2 December 2014 at 09:15, jfm...@free.fr mailto:jfm...@free.fr
Compose started at Wed Dec 3 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[cab]
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-12-03)
Meeting started by hhorak at 12:02:01 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On 02/12/14 18:12, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 2 December 2014 at 09:22, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:15:38PM +0100, jfm...@free.fr
mailto:jfm...@free.fr wrote:
Now it seems Fedora's downloads
Action Items
* bkabrda will ask java guys to create a wiki page summarizing the
approaches we thought of and why we think it's not worth the effort +
post the link to WG ML once it's ready
Here it is: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mizdebsk/FedoraMavenRepository
Is anyone going to scream if PVM get's retired?
Upstream was last updated in 2009 as far as I can tell...
It's packaging is atrocious...
The source is copied to the buildroot and compiled in place...
It violates the packaging guidelines in multiple bad ways...
Also see:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-12-03)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-12-03/fesco.2014-12-03-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Hi
Today I tried to use few Fedora tools and was greet with nice tracebacks
when gave wrong arguments or something other happened. But that's not
why I am writing.
What surprised me more is that Fedora tools are still Python 2.x based.
Someone may write so what? but I think that using legacy
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
When I worked at Canonical there was a goal to move both internal and
public tools to Python 3.x version. IIRC started somewhere around 12.04
and today when you look at Ubuntu Touch you will not find Python 2.7
there. Similar
PVM in particular and high-performance computing in general are
severely broken in most Linux distros and applications. First of all,
there's licensing - the GPU folk, especially NVidia, aren't willing to
back down as long as their intellectual property strategies are making
them rich. For
Hello All!
I've removed SSLv3 from the list of supported crypto protocols in
Erlang. This should apply only for cases where application doesn't
define explicitly a list of supported protocols. E.g. if your package
explicitly enables SSLv3 then it will be available, otherwise - won't
be. The
Through some series of accidents, the python-pyudev package in Fedora is
assigned to clock...@redhat.com. This account has been closed since at
least early 2013. The email address isn't invalid exactly in that
emails won't bounce, but it is a black hole from which no responses will
return, and
NOTE: Signing of the RC5 checksums is not yet complete. To be sure we're
testing the right bits we should remember to check that the images we
test match the signed checksum files once they're available, and of
course you can carefully check the TLS certificate of the server when
downloading the
Hi,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-34.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-31.3.0-1.fc20
are already to be push to stable without passing to test repo .
But for what I see: stable karma: 0 it shouldn't be pulled to stable
even with karma 4 .
I had an idea
why not ? be possible, set in Bodhi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-12-04 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-12-04 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2014-12-04 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2014-12-04
W dniu 03.12.2014 o 20:30, Matthew Miller pisze:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
When I worked at Canonical there was a goal to move both internal and
public tools to Python 3.x version. IIRC started somewhere around 12.04
and today when you look at Ubuntu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode:
c3c5a8a6bce9f21cc274730ec044b8c2 Encode-2.66.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 88ba553934d5df9dc8b2a1acd3ea42522d9dea5c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 3 09:09:06 2014 +0100
2.66 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 511e4f2cda0b673d5573e9262be73bb5e7cb3ab0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 3 09:09:06 2014 +0100
2.66 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus:
cf3059679588412fee9323f6ad39f6f2 App-cpanminus-1.7018.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 89dcee8cac842d4bd2ac9ce0ba1acf35e8fc59e4
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 3 12:49:30 2014 +0100
1.7018 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-cpanminus.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168862
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is caused by upgrading gdk-pixbuf2 from 2.31.1-1.fc22 to 2.31.2-1.fc22.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168862
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067394
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168862
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Upstream fixed it in 0.019.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gtk3:
b92a5d42f8f66d16221ad77a8d0e8ede Gtk3-0.019.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d3fb0c263d7ccb6528d669ba97369e765d40effc
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 3 15:40:35 2014 +0100
0.019 bump
perl-Gtk3.spec | 18 +++---
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk3.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168862
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067394
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168861
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is caused by upgrading Moose from 2.1005-5.fc22 to 2.1402-1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Want:
48e7ab117a1054a25a5dfbd117d38cd4 Want-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit fa6f75df7774d6ffdb12d86e7a8aa3a2a89a7cb1
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 3 16:20:31 2014 +0100
Upstream update.
- Switch to using DESTDIR and pure_install.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Want.spec | 10 +++---
sources|2 +-
commit d57e7fab890dffbcf426b007cce4253a4d24d463
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 3 16:22:23 2014 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Want.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Want.spec b/perl-Want.spec
index
Summary of changes:
57eeb4d... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
fa6f75d... Upstream update. (*)
d57e7fa... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 0b9200dbbede629e32ebd9e8d65c64cf66acd4f9
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 3 16:24:14 2014 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Want.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Want.spec b/perl-Want.spec
index
Summary of changes:
ae1bda0... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
b05f6a1... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (*)
57eeb4d... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
fa6f75d... Upstream update. (*)
d57e7fa... Merge cleanup. (*)
0b9200d... Merge
Summary of changes:
ae1bda0... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
b05f6a1... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (*)
57eeb4d... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
fa6f75d... Upstream update. (*)
d57e7fa... Merge cleanup. (*)
0b9200d... Merge
commit 9a4543b1efdd2e121cb572c53f6549f9267ce9c6
Merge: 564db11 0b9200d
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 3 16:26:25 2014 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f20' into f19
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Want.spec |8 ++--
sources|2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is caused by upgrading perl-SQL-Abstract from 1.77-3.fc22 to 1.81-1.fc22.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168861
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1169358
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This bug disappears if perl-Moo is installed. Isn't a bug in the
perl-SQL-Abstract packaging?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The perl-SQL-Abstract contains:
package SQL::Abstract::Tree;
# DO NOT edit away without talking to riba first, he will just put it back
# BEGIN pre-Moo2 import block
BEGIN {
require
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|perl-SQL-Abstract-Limit |perl-SQL-Abstract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:47:14AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
There are a *lot* of orphaned packages in EPEL what will be retired (removed)
shortly if no one steps up to maintain them. Iain is the current EPEL
maintainer on most of them, but I understand that he doesn't really have time
commit 4ab1d94b7b52c2a760dbb262165e5b945449d419
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 3 18:13:06 2014 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-SQL-Abstract.spec | 67 +++
1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051110
pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||fst_ping=1
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051110
pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168882
--- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for the quick fix here. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169369
Wade Mealing wmeal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163299
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163299
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-String-Errf-0.007-1.fc
On 4 Dec 2014 00:59, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 3, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
- (This is not really related to the switch, but more of a general
remark) In [4], it says that python 3 version of the executable gains a
python3- prefix. This is
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:40AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 4 Dec 2014 00:38, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
So here are my proposals for changes in current guidelines [2]:
- In [3], it says If the executables provide the same functionality
independent of whether they are
57 matches
Mail list logo
