Is the EPIC proposal totally dead? It seems like that would be a nicer
and more general solution to this problem (not wanting to ship a Python
3.x stack for 10 years).
Personally I am not looking forward to maintaining more branches and/or
(sub-)packages for every python3X-*.
--
Dan
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:25:36 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Harden all
On 8 January 2015 at 17:01, Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Is the EPIC proposal totally dead? It seems like that would be a nicer
and more general solution to this problem (not wanting to ship a Python
3.x stack for 10 years).
The EPIC proposal needs
a) A formal proposal
b) People
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
72
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3621/php-Smarty-3.1.21-1.el7
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
13
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
992
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
211
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6
81
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839754
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
992
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
446
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
211
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:25:36 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Harden all packages with
position-independent code =
Harden all packages with
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 06:05 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi all,
I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so I
finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL 7
(it'd also scale to EPEL 6 for that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:43:48 -0500
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180372
Bug ID: 1180372
Summary: Bug reporter seems to be missing from the cc list
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: bugzilla
Severity: high
Assignee: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
A. Robot-Roll Call
B. Old Business [Go over decided items from previous meetings:]
1. Next Orphan Day
C. Current Business
1. Website cleaning (deal with FAQ page)
2. ...
D. Next Meeting Business
1; EPIC?
E. Open Flood
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
So if we truly want to address this feature, we should also disallow
non-root user password based ssh logins.
Do I get this right? You want to disallow any remote logins (which
nowadays means using ssh)?
No, he means that ssh connections should require a pre-shared key. My
systems are
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:54 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:09:02 +0200
Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 14:53 +0100, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
A bug is open for perl-XML-TreePP since July (for opening a epel
7 branch) with no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180372
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180372
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |
P4 2.8G, no hyperthreading, with i865G video.
F20 and F21 work normally.
Kernel 3.19.0-0.rc3.git1.2.fc22.i686+PAE on an i686
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-2.fc22.i686
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.16.2.901-1.fc22.i686
Installing libinput didn't help.
Chmod 4711 /usr/bin/Xorg didn't help.
KDE in F22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180372
Jason McDonald jmcdo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grgo...@yahoo.com
On 01/08/2015 04:37 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
So if we truly want to address this feature, we should also disallow
non-root user password based ssh logins.
Do I get this right? You want to disallow any remote logins (which
nowadays means using ssh)?
How are people supposed to perform remote
Sorry to say, but this is like the hundredth time this topic came up.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-July/200860.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.01.2015 um 00:35 schrieb drago01:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:25:36 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um
Am 08.01.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
In most of the cases, we end up requiring someone to go to the system
physically and doing some initial work if we run into any of 0-3. Of
course that works great if you have a physical server. We virtualize
most of our servers which ends up
Am 09.01.2015 um 00:16 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:25:36 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Harden all packages with
position-independent code =
Harden all packages with
Am 09.01.2015 um 00:35 schrieb drago01:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:25:36 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Harden all packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:09:02 +0200
Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 14:53 +0100, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
A bug is open for perl-XML-TreePP since July (for opening a epel 7
branch) with no reaction
On 8 January 2015 at 15:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
In most of the cases, we end up requiring someone to go to the system
physically and doing some initial work if we run into any of 0-3. Of
course that works great if
On 8 January 2015 at 15:54, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:09:02 +0200
Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 14:53 +0100, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
A bug is open for
Am 08.01.2015 um 23:54 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
On 8 January 2015 at 15:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.01.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
In most of the cases, we end up requiring someone to go to the
system
physically and doing some initial work
Am 08.01.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
That is kind of a basic requirement. We need to do more. We need to inform
people when their release is going EOL and we also need to automatically
prompt users to upgrade whenever there is a new release (ie) some integration
between GNOME
commit 9b09d2acfb3f20fd44f981ad95f8c3658bb45d8f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 12:40:24 2015 +0100
0.18 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Inline-Struct.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4
Hi everyone!
Fedora 22 and especially Changes submission deadline [1] is coming pretty
soon - in less than two weeks on January 20th. With Alpha release in March.
Please, submit your System Wide Changes by this deadline, earlier better.
There's one significant change FESCo agreed at yesterday's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178392
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Inline-Struct-0.18-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Inline-Struct-0.18-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Inline-Struct:
5989ac99397dd177b63d8ea80ea3f488 Inline-Struct-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 8.1.2015 v 12:30 Felix Schwarz napsal(a):
Am 08.01.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
That is kind of a basic requirement. We need to do more. We need to inform
people when their release is going EOL and we also need to automatically
prompt users to upgrade whenever there is a new
Summary of changes:
9b09d2a... 0.18 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Thu Jan 8 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[InsightToolkit]
InsightToolkit-4.7.0-2.fc22.i686 requires libhdf5_cpp.so.8
InsightToolkit-4.7.0-2.fc22.i686 requires libhdf5.so.8
[Sprog]
- Original Message -
= Proposed System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
Change owner(s): Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Replace the current (low-level) input xorg drivers with libinput using the
commit db555c569ad447497f7f0ed772d9f4594a29edc7
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 8 13:31:46 2015 +0100
Upstream update.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Test-CheckManifest.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CheckManifest:
7ad56b6f7149b3b08f4030175deadb99 Test-CheckManifest-1.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e5f1f38c803fdd7b0aed562ea3c4ff82dcbe2d84
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 8 13:33:44 2015 +0100
Cleanup merger.
perl-Test-CheckManifest.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-CheckManifest.spec
Summary of changes:
24ab76c... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
db555c5... Upstream update. (*)
e5f1f38... Cleanup merger.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 9a0fc6b0877b80b965f5d85262668e5901e4cfcd
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 8 13:35:37 2015 +0100
Cleanup merger.
perl-Test-CheckManifest.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-CheckManifest.spec
Summary of changes:
543b8c4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
24ab76c... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
db555c5... Upstream update. (*)
e5f1f38... Cleanup merger. (*)
9a0fc6b... Cleanup merger.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
Change owner(s): P J P p...@fedoraproject.org and Fedora Security Team
To disable remote root login facility in sshd(8) by default.
== Detailed Description ==
Sshd(8)
commit ccfb5e983299eaab96422781bd31c688f9926f5b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 13:21:18 2015 +0100
Use plain subpackage subname instead of full name
It will be consistent with other subpackages and it will not harm SCL
prefixing.
perl.spec |4 ++--
1
Hi,
On 08-01-15 13:31, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
= Proposed System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
Change owner(s): Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Replace the current (low-level) input
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178391
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1180132
Referenced
commit aa1c9e121ceec6b7b7ace9f2754305282bc71090
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 14:11:47 2015 +0100
0.9.1 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WWW-OrangeHRM-Client.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WWW-OrangeHRM-Client:
2b6ec89e3c27aaf0581433a70f8463a1 WWW-OrangeHRM-Client-v0.9.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit eec953fee135fec96edf6d2f1dedda9f76b39a13
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 14:11:47 2015 +0100
0.9.1 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WWW-OrangeHRM-Client.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
commit e32af5b462f196f93ec44ddd1dbcf4134c4a01ab
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 14:11:47 2015 +0100
0.9.1 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WWW-OrangeHRM-Client.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Inline-C:
fb9a7dc92b959ab023838357767a5251 Inline-C-0.73.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08.01.2015 09:06, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:14:00 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
So what I'm planning to do is to retire the iax package in Fedora, and
have add to the iaxclient package the subpackages -libiax and
-libiax-devel, containing the iaxclient bundled libiax2,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone:
ef1230370de893f604ec5ca58e3f76af DateTime-TimeZone-1.83.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178381
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:14:00 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
So what I'm planning to do is to retire the iax package in Fedora, and
have add to the iaxclient package the subpackages -libiax and
-libiax-devel, containing the iaxclient bundled libiax2, with appropriate
Obsoletes: iax 0.2.3
On 2015-01-08, 03:36 GMT, Richard Shaw wrote:
In the specific case I ran into one of the package suites I've been working
on technically bundles a modified copy of xmlrpcpp. However, it is quite
modified, upstream is dead, it's not already in Fedora, and the author I'm
working with only uses
commit 129561a7b96ede977eb21134619401b4b6019dd0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 09:30:16 2015 +0100
Skip test on bootstrap because of non-core Devel::FindPerl
perl-App-a2p.spec | 18 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit dd0cf0f6b41d6c77391153287a5dcb89086a405c
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:16:40 2015 +0100
1.83 bump, tests enhanced for 5.21
- Dropping F16-era conflicts
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec | 56 +++
sources
commit c2ae212c0bad96b98b2bdef2fd553f619a8c621a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:33:36 2015 +0100
Disable a test when bootstrapping because of non-core Devel::FindPerl
perl-App-find2perl.spec | 19 ++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
* Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
19:09:55)
What does it mean actually? Does it mean that if I plan to do rebuild of
Ruby packages in side-tag, I am supposed to
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CHI:
fc0d4210ed8d132e7bc0bd0c2bd0b62f CHI-0.59.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
99f1a26... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
573b2be... Upstream update. (*)
4b61271... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 650459bae801bb5861d2e6d935c41a203383c84c
Merge: c53c75b 4b61271
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 8 11:02:55 2015 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f21' into f20
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-CHI.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
Summary of changes:
99f1a26... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
573b2be... Upstream update. (*)
4b61271... Merge cleanup. (*)
650459b... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f21' into f20
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:30:03AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
We just went over something very much like this for x86_64 packages
with FESCo ticket 1113:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1113
Could you perhaps review that and elaborate on the
commit 3cc79fa01cd58de4d477dbc94658cb2a83ddf0c1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:44:58 2015 +0100
Disable a test when bootrapping because of a non-core Devel::FindPerl
perl-App-s2p.spec | 29 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8
commit 573b2be60e77911766b13dd7792c95d9d899b702
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:47:47 2015 +0100
Upstream update.
- Reflect upstream URL having changed.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-CHI.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files
commit 4b6127114f43417039e8e261e2702623cc81b6dd
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:49:05 2015 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-CHI.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CHI.spec b/perl-CHI.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178793
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit b32c33eae3e2140a5e2ad4dcd0fa3f534adc1a78
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 11:07:05 2015 +0100
5.030 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dist-Zilla.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
Hi,
Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
* #1379 F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg (sgallagh,
19:51:28)
* AGREED: Approved with two caveats: 1) Both GNOME and KDE must be
updated
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dist-Zilla:
f43182f5b49781e44aac8d72348de8f9 Dist-Zilla-5.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0b0e9bea1d1071a0ddf1ec53275c48a0122f57c9
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 8 14:19:24 2015 +0100
0.73 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Inline-C.spec | 13 +
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178390
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
Change owner(s): P J P p...@fedoraproject.org and Fedora Security Team
To disable remote root login
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
Change owner(s): P J P p...@fedoraproject.org and Fedora Security Team
To disable remote root login facility in sshd(8) by
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:59 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 08-01-15 13:31, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
= Proposed System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
Change owner(s): Hans
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
| Your package accepts/processes untrusted input.
This seems to be about every package that I use, because I most if not
all tools process untrusted data from the Internet.
+1. This view is rapidly gaining traction and visibility in recent times.
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 08:47 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
| Your package accepts/processes untrusted input.
This seems to be about every package that I use, because I most if not
all tools process untrusted data from the Internet.
+1. This
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:43:48AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Can we clarify something here? Is this a request to change the defaults
globally for all Products/nonproduct installs?
I would argue that it could be sensible to do this for Workstation and
non-product installs, but not for
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Can we throw prelink out as well when we do this?
Prelink is already gone. We haven't been running it since F19, IIRC.
Oh. Spending too much time on RHEL, and not enough time to upgrade my
desktop to a non-EOL fedora :)
Thanks,
Paul
--
devel
- Original Message -
snip
Thanks, Hans. We wanted to make sure that we didn't have another
instance of the bluetooth fiasco from a couple releases ago, where GNOME
changed the Bluetooth stack and broke things underneath KDE. If this is
already addressed (or at least irrelevant),
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 08:48 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:43:48AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Can we clarify something here? Is this a request to change the defaults
globally for all Products/nonproduct installs?
I would argue that it could be sensible to
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of packages dependent on it as much as
possible.
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
snip
Thanks, Hans. We wanted to make sure that we didn't have another
instance of the bluetooth fiasco from a couple releases ago, where GNOME
changed the Bluetooth stack and broke things underneath
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
* Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
19:09:55)
What does it mean actually? Does it mean that if I plan to do rebuild of
Ruby packages in side-tag,
On 08/01/15 18:07, Anshu Prateek wrote:
hi,
I am trying to package aerospike. It uses some of libraries as modules /
git sub-modules.
https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-server/tree/master/modules
Do the jansson, jemalloc and luajit fall under the purview of bundled
libraries ?
Well,
Cool, thanks. Will try using the packages.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 at 10:55 pm Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/01/15 18:07, Anshu Prateek wrote:
hi,
I am trying to package aerospike. It uses some of libraries as modules /
git sub-modules.
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:10:36 -0500
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
The only other approach I could see for the headless
servers would be mandating the enrollment in an identity domain at
installation time (such as to FreeIPA or Active Directory).
And in this scenario we should
Am 08.01.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com said:
The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
[1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple libdb
versions in system is very problematic. As some packages
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com wrote:
However, as I have only very hazy ideas on how some of the dependent
packages are used or why they need libdb, I would like to ask for
cooperation, ideally from the package maintainers themselves. The
information on how to
On 08/01/15 13:56, Jan Staněk wrote:
However, as I have only very hazy ideas on how some of the dependent
packages are used or why they need libdb, I would like to ask for
cooperation, ideally from the package maintainers themselves. The
information on how to remove dependency, what would need
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
Change owner(s): P J P
Am 08.01.2015 um 16:10 schrieb David Cantrell:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Why does v6 having an incompatible license mean we should get rid of v5?
BerkeleyDB is widely used because it meets a
On 01/08/2015 06:56 AM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of
Once upon a time, Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com said:
The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
[1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple libdb
versions in system is very problematic. As some packages cannot use
newer versions, we are basically
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com said:
The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was already discussed at this list
[1], and it turned out that peaceful cooperation of multiple libdb
versions in system is very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
* Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
19:09:55)
What
Le Thursday 08 January 2015 08:42:45 Paul Wouters a écrit :
If you want to fight that, you need to set PasswordAuthentication no and
insist that people start using ssh keypairs instead.
Would not the following satisfy everybody?
Match User root
PasswordAuthentication no
--
Laurent Rineau
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
