On 14 Jan 2015, at 12:34, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I'd request all(those who are opposing) too describe their
requirements in the etherpad page above.
Being able to authenticate as root right after installation would be
the requirement for me.
Let’s be precise here; “able to authenticate as
On 01/14/2015 12:39 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
MX-CNAME is against RFCs but in common enough real-world usage that
anything that doesn't handle it is generally considered broken.
However, that isn't the case for cchtml.com; the MX points to
cchtml.com, not mail.cchtml.com, and cchtml.com has an A
Am 14.01.2015 um 19:39 schrieb Chris Adams:
MX-CNAME is against RFCs but in common enough real-world usage that
anything that doesn't handle it is generally considered broken.
Well, one of the biggest German freemailers refused to send emails for
recipient domains using MX is CNAME when using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161232
It seems like this is the 3rd or 4th time that this functionality has
been broken, leaving anyone who needs to simultaneously connect to both
VPN and other non-public (e.g. home network) resources up a creek.
Would this be worth of a test case?
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 16:54 +, P J P wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 8:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok, I state my opposition to without-password too inequivocably
here. Mostly because it is just the same as 'no', given there is
no way, in a regular install to seed a key
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-01-14)
===
Meeting started by mattdm at 18:01:50 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-14/fesco.2015-01-14-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Björn Persson Bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote:
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On the other hand, if every message that was not meant for the user
were suppressed, it would be very difficult to troubleshoot such a
program, should an actual bug come along, because you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:40:35 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 16:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:57:59 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:35:02AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 00:29 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Björn Persson Bjorn@rombobjörn.se
mailto:Bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote:
If they don't have such a build-time option, then what I'm saying is
On 01/14/2015 04:38 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And it seems that this is the number of packages written in C++:
$ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --source --whatrequires
'libstdc++.so.6*' | sort -u | sed -r 's/(.*)-.*-.*/\1/' | uniq | wc -l
2396
I'd like to point out at this place,
Am 15.01.2015 um 00:29 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Björn Persson Bjorn@rombobjörn.se
mailto:Bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote:
If they don't have such a build-time option, then what I'm saying is
that if one were to suppress the messages, then one should do
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Björn Persson Bjorn@rombobjörn.se
wrote:
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On the other hand, if every message that was not meant for the user
were suppressed, it would be very difficult to troubleshoot such a
program, should an actual
Am 15.01.2015 um 00:36 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
the real problem with that crap messages is that if you are about
writing a longer command line and the in background mode started GUI
app decides to blow out it's helpful messages they appear unasked in
the middle of your input and so
Am 15.01.2015 um 00:13 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 14.01.2015 um 23:36 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On the other hand, if every message that was not meant for the user
were suppressed, it would be
Fedora had a 35 minutes off the internet outage starting around 21:30 UTC.
This was due to my pushing an incomplete DNS table out causing named to
crash when it got to starting the file getfedora.com and not finding it.
Problem was backed out and changed but because of a bootstrap issue of
needing
Am 14.01.2015 um 23:36 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On the other hand, if every message that was not meant for the user
were suppressed, it would be very difficult to troubleshoot such a
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:36:27AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Björn Persson Bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote:
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On the other hand, if every message that was not meant for the user
were suppressed, it would be very difficult to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Björn Persson Bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote:
If they don't have such a build-time option, then what I'm saying is
that if one were to suppress the messages, then one should do it with a
run-time option, not a build-time option. Then no different build would
be
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On the other hand, if every message that was not meant for the user
were suppressed, it would be very difficult to troubleshoot such a
program, should an actual bug come along, because you would need a
different build to get useful output in the console or a logging
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 14:29 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161232
It seems like this is the 3rd or 4th time that this functionality has
been broken, leaving anyone who needs to simultaneously connect to both
VPN and other non-public (e.g. home network)
All,
As discussed in [1], I've updated the wxPython package into Rawhide to
wxPython 3.0. I'll start working on testing all of the dependent
packages. If any maintainers of dependent packages can test their
packages, that would be helpful too. Please let me know the status, or
update the
Dear all,
I am not sure whether this has been discussed before or whether it's
appropriate to discuss this in this list.
My question is about c++11 support for the projects on epel (probably more
specifically, epel7). Do we have any kind of general policy regarding c++11
support?
I am asking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083292
I know that this isn't directly related to Fedora, but I was wondering if
anyone had any recommendations on how to proceed with this. clang and icpc
generate code that has the correct behavior
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
* Contingency mechanism: Revert to older gcc, mass rebuild everything again
* Contingency deadline: Before release
This is an invasive contingency mechanism, requiring retesting a lot of
functionality; the contingency
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we
On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Again, how is that different from F9, F11, F13, F15, F17, F19?
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
is moving from C89 to C11 as
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
What are the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:57:59 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will not use
the lvm plugin. we make every buildroot from scratch
On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:53:23 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
IMO, the ones opposing are those who fear their current
setups/practices would break. Because they need remote 'root' access
in their set-up. Which is a
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:05:09PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Well, if we want to turn Fedora into a collection of obsolete software
rather than trying to lead progress, we don't have to update anything.
I think that's a bit of an over reaction, ultimately F-22 is due to
branch on
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:24 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:00:27PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications =
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:53:23 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hello Simo,
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 2:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Sorry this is false. You got enough emails telling you this
change is undesirable, that's the definition of opposition
and means you have
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:24:29PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html →
commit 5f5a4df31398551361d1b0f75a1ecb90942b4381
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 14 15:32:31 2015 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-Linux-Pid.spec | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Linux-Pid.spec
commit a38f98427aa354088ce55c45be29322c7e08c593
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 14 15:36:03 2015 +0100
Fix dependency filtering
perl-Linux-Pid.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Linux-Pid.spec b/perl-Linux-Pid.spec
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:37:02PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Again, how is that different from F9, F11, F13, F15, F17, F19?
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change (as you know)
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
is moving from C89 to C11 as the default C standard for the compiler
Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:48:16 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 16:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:57:59 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will not use
the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
is
commit fe850d568e8d59fb2c295c191fa53ee85f7f7c50
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 14 15:46:28 2015 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-Data-Flow.spec | 19 ---
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Data-Flow.spec
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404
That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we find
during that.
Do you have any estimate when it will be done? F22 schedule is/will be pretty
tight. We already have problem scheduling mass rebuild and I expect GCC 5
commit a25222cb60a95469eef076d20d326077d5c423b2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 15 07:53:09 2015 +0100
Correct changelog date
perl-IO-stringy.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-stringy.spec b/perl-IO-stringy.spec
commit 3d4630751c1c599e2d8cda14adb59f578d66477a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 15 07:48:37 2015 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-IO-stringy.spec | 16 +---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-stringy.spec
commit 98512bb983c0a188364f14763b8d77488a82ef42
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 15 08:14:27 2015 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-File-Which.spec | 21 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Which.spec
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:31:05AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:24 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:00:27PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
997
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
216
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6
87
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
997
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
451
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
216
On 14 January 2015 at 14:47, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 15:53 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:48:16 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015
Jaroslav Reznik píše v St 14. 01. 2015 v 13:00 +0100:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnomeShell_NewNotifications
Change owner(s): Florian Müllner fmuel...@redhat.com
Redesign the way in which notifications are
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 01/14/2015 06:28 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
[snip]
* Contingency mechanism: Revert and try to do in next release
I don't see this one happening. The patch set is large. Upstream has
rejected it. The affected
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43:46PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
Yeah I just delete those mails now days. Its just spam F19 is EOL is
not news that I need to get 1000 times.
Right, clearly, that message is not really for _you_. It's for the
people who reported the bug.
--
Matthew Miller
Hi,
let me invite you to DevConf.cz 2015 [1] which will take place in Brno,
Czech Republic on Feb 6-8.
The third day of the conference will again be Fedora Day with a lot of
Fedora-focused talks and discussions (and also with a lot of Fedora
contributors around). You can find the list of
Halle,
I have got a mail from a guy which ask me for co-maintainership of the inady-mt
package.
Unfortunately, I have got the below error report on the try to contact
him via mail.
So I would like to ask how I can contact him via an alternative mail
contact.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:47, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:24:29PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
I was thinking exactly that, mass rebuild is scheduled for Jan 30th
according to the schedule [1] with branching 10 days or so later. That
is only two weeks away. With statements like The release will happen
probably in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169369
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169369
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1182257
* Contingency mechanism: Revert to older gcc, mass rebuild everything again
* Contingency deadline: Before release
This is an invasive contingency mechanism, requiring retesting a lot of
functionality; the contingency deadline for this (i.e. when we need to be
comfortable that the revert will
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:37:22AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Look at your results; you did not get that result in your dig. You got
tahk you for your information, but the error message was created by a
relay host located by my ISP.
failure while trying to resolve cchtml.com/MX. It works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:34:22 -0500 (EST)
Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:54:09 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 8:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok, I state my opposition
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:51:24PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
* Contingency mechanism: Revert to older gcc, mass rebuild everything again
* Contingency deadline: Before release
This is an invasive contingency mechanism, requiring retesting a lot of
functionality; the contingency
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:34:22 -0500 (EST)
Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:54:09 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
I'd request all(those who are opposing) too describe their
requirements in the etherpad page above.
Being able to
On 01/14/2015 11:52 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
I have retried to send the message without any success. But I have tried to
maske an DNS query directly agins the Google DNS and have find out, that the
hostname, which you have specified as a mail excahnge is a CNAME. But this is
not
allowed for MX
Am 14.01.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Jochen Schmitt:
It very important, that your domain provides any MX records because
this is absolutly require to send mails to your domain
bullshit - fix your mailserver
there is no need for a MX record
read the SMTP RFC
the only reason when you need a MX is
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:54:09 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 8:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok, I state my opposition to without-password too inequivocably
here. Mostly because it is just the same as 'no', given there is no
way, in a
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:47:07AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi,
I'm here. I'm not sure why your e-mail failed. Could you try it again?
When I call dig with your domain, I have to recornized, thatyour domain
doesn't provides any MX records. I have tried to contact the
homstmaster of
On 01/14/2015 11:26 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
When I call dig with your domain, I have to recornized, thatyour domain
doesn't provides any MX records. I have tried to contact the
homstmaster of your domain without any response.
It very important, that your domain provides any MX records because
Once upon a time, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de said:
When I call dig with your domain, I have to recornized, thatyour domain
doesn't provides any MX records. I have tried to contact the
homstmaster of your domain without any response.
Look at your results; you did not get that result
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 10:44 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Anaconda installer OR maybe OpenSSH package needs to create
initial set of authentication keys for 'root' user.
Sorry, but what is the point of this operation, wrt auth with keys issue ?
Well, it can be used it to export to
On 01/14/2015 10:42 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
I have got a mail from a guy which ask me for co-maintainership of the inady-mt
package.
Unfortunately, I have got the below error report on the try to contact
him via mail.
So I would like to ask how I can contact him via an alternative mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Hi,
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 8:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok, I state my opposition to without-password too inequivocably here.
Mostly because it is just the same as 'no', given there is no way, in a
regular install to seed a key into the root account.
Except you have no mechanism to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:05:50PM +, David Howells wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
Does cross-gcc need to switch simultaneously? Some packages are built with
that, I believe.
It is a different package,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
Does cross-gcc need to switch simultaneously? Some packages are built with
that, I believe.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:54:09 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 8:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok, I state my opposition to without-password too inequivocably
here. Mostly because it is just the same as 'no', given there is no
way, in a regular
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:27:51 -0600
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 01/14/2015 11:26 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
When I call dig with your domain, I have to recornized, thatyour
domain doesn't provides any MX records. I have tried to contact the
homstmaster of your domain
Once upon a time, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de said:
I have retried to send the message without any success. But I have tried to
maske an DNS query directly agins the Google DNS and have find out, that the
hostname, which you have specified as a mail excahnge is a CNAME. But this is
Hi List,
I just pushed a package for review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261 and would like some
review on it.
I work at Red Hat India and contribute to KDE in my free time. I blog at
http://sinny.io/ and also give talks at local FOSS events (the last one was
on basic RPM
Hi,
I don't think the original question was all that great. If we were to
script the change to add the BRs, it would take time but it would
mostly be a one-time cost. Reducing buildroot time creation, network
bandwidth, and storage savings is a reduction over each new buildroot
instance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180476
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181998
Bug ID: 1181998
Summary: perl-Pod-Simple-3.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Simple
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
- Original Message -
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one
before F21 Beta?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:00:27PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnomeShell_NewNotifications
Change owner(s): Florian Müllner fmuel...@redhat.com
Redesign the way in which
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:00:27PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnomeShell_NewNotifications
Change
On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will not use the
lvm plugin. we make every buildroot from scratch using a fully clean
environment to help with ensuring reproducability.
You can cache and still preserve reproducability. What
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:53:02 -0600
Yaakov Selkowitz yselk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
What are the goals of a mass rebuild
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:53:18PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek ja...@redhat.com
Switch GCC
Dne 14.1.2015 v 12:53 Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a):
= Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek ja...@redhat.com
Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
== Detailed Description ==
GCC 5 is currently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
You forgot too many packages? There are
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Marcel Oliver
m.oli...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
Some of the main culprints for me are nemo, evince, and okular;
The applications that you mention are parts of specific desktop
environments. The messages that you see are not meant to be visible to the
user,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON:
1d6f3ff573e8b8b3daf89f677b7404bf Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode
commit f74b3fbf7b5b34b64e102cce588f4b657da61688
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 14 12:46:36 2015 +0100
Specify run-time dependency versions
perl-CGI-Fast.spec | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Fast.spec
= Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek ja...@redhat.com
Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it.
== Detailed Description ==
GCC 5 is currently in stage3, but in 3 days will move to stage4, in
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
