Hi,
We have a test day event for Internationalization on f22 as usual to make sure
if f22 has any issues around i18n.
Please join Freenode #fedora-test-day and try if your primary language works on
f22 when you have a bit of time.
Test cases and details are:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_
VTK 6.2.0 is currently building in rawhide. I'll be rebuilding deps
tomorrow.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
Hi,
I'm a Senior DevOps Engineer (or SysAdmin for the less buzzword
inclined) who has been active on the CentOS mailing lists, IRC and
lurking around the Fedora mailing lists for some time - with the
occasional input.
I was keeping an eye out on a particular package that I wanted to use
on some s
On 03/18/2015 02:54 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Any advise from the change owners? How should applications that use
> modules with undefined systems should handle that?
What semantics do you expect from the undefined symbol?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
--
devel mailin
On 03/18/2015 03:21 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> I was doing some research last night but not tested it yet:
>
> "nonow"
That's not a thing. The opposite of “-z now” is “-z lazy”:
else if (strcmp (optarg, "now") == 0)
{
link_info.flags |= (bfd_vma) DF_BIND_NOW;
link_
17.03.2015 02:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300
> Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>
>> The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have
>> worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass
>> rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-03-19 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-03-19 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-03-19 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-03-19 1
Hello.
18.03.2015 14:08, David Woodhouse wrote:
> After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
> concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
> reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta.
>
> The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawhide and f2
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-03-18)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-03-18/fesco.2015-03-18-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Am 18.03.2015 um 19:37 schrieb Moez Roy:
I was not successful with -Wl,-z -Wl,nonow
FULL RELO: -Wl,-z,now
YOU: -Wl,-z -Wl,nonow
TRY: -Wl,-z,nonow
what you did was change semantics for unknown reasons
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
d
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 10:57 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>>
>>> > Am 16.03.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
>>> > > What was the rationale of adding -z no
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 13:56:07 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've got the misfortune of maintaining a small number of systems that use
> > the cx18 driver for their HVR-1600 cards; I'm just in the process of
> > bringing th
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got the misfortune of maintaining a small number of systems that use
> the cx18 driver for their HVR-1600 cards; I'm just in the process of
> bringing these systems up to Fedora 21, and have discovered that
> cx18-firmw
On 03/18/2015 05:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
What I don't understand is the wisdom of an official Fedora
"product" endorsing a copr when either the software or packaging (or
both) is not of sufficient quality to make it i
Hello all,
I've got the misfortune of maintaining a small number of systems that use
the cx18 driver for their HVR-1600 cards; I'm just in the process of
bringing these systems up to Fedora 21, and have discovered that
cx18-firmware was retired.
As I'm going to have to maintain the package for wo
Hi
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> What I don't understand is the wisdom of an official Fedora "product"
> endorsing a copr when either the software or packaging (or both) is not of
> sufficient quality to make it into the official Fedora repo.
I don't think of it a
On 18 Mar 2015, at 08:40, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 03/16/2015 06:48 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
If the working group deems the software to be that useful,
wouldn't it be better to bring its packaging up to the
quality of the "official" Fedora repo, and make it more easily
discoverable by all
Hi,
Today we have moved copr builders to Fedora 21,
rawhide builds should be fine again.
If you encounter some new problem, please inform us at copr-devel@ ML
or at irc: #fedora-buildsys
--
Best regards,
Gologuzov Valentin.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 10:57 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
>> > Am 16.03.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
>> > > What was the rationale of adding -z now to the hardening flags? Looking
>> > > its description d
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 10:57 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > Am 16.03.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
> > > What was the rationale of adding -z now to the hardening flags? Looking
> > > its description doesn't reveal any "hardening" features, and the gnutls
> > > guile modu
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:13:06 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse
> wrote:
> > After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
> > concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
> > reverted to a slightly earlier snapsh
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:05:35 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> Ah, from yesterday. I hadn't seen that yet. I hope it does, because
> I have things to build in Rawhide COPRs :).
>
> Still, I would suggest waiting at least a few days to see if there is
> any other fallout before we consider it for f22.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 18/03/15 11:55, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
>>> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
On 03/18/2015 12:55 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> How are "disabled repositories" going to be approved for inclusion?
While you likely meant political meaning of "how", I would like share how it
will be done technically.
Approximately 6 months ago Env&Stack wanted to have "Playground repository",
On 03/16/2015 06:48 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
> If the working group deems the software to be that useful, wouldn't it be
> better to bring its packaging up to the
> quality of the "official" Fedora repo, and make it more easily discoverable
> by all Fedora users, regardless of whether
> they cho
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:53:50AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > In the cloud and docker images, we've been carrying horribly hacks
> > (really, horrible) to strip this out ofter the fact. The new fix would
> > let us get the same effect the right way. I'm told that this is a
> > low-risk change
- Original Message -
> On Mar 17, 2015 5:18 AM, "Jan Zelený" wrote:
> >
> > On 16. 3. 2015 at 15:52:10, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport
> > >
> > > Change owner(s
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 11:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > 2015-03-16 15:52 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
> >
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport
> >
> >
> > "Disabled Repositories Support" sounds be
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 12:52 +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday and today this mirror caused yum to hang for
> indefinite periods of time (waited over two minutes),
> only c-c helps.
>
> Richard
Hi Richard,
I've forwarded your report to the fedora-infrastructure mailing list.
--
Thank
On 18/03/15 11:55, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
"instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
cours
Hi!
This is a reminder, that Fedora 22 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code
Complete Deadline is coming in two weeks. It's important milestone
as for this release, we'd like to strictly adhere to schedule and
contingency plan may be put into effect for Changes that miss
this deadline. As always, the list
> 2015-03-16 15:52 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
>
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport
>
>
> "Disabled Repositories Support" sounds better than "Help People Install
> Non-Free Software in Fedora", but the res
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
> minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
> course we want Fedora to be internati
My 2cts as Cloud SIG member is that we shouldn't wait for F23 as long as
it's ready for beta or even shortly before.
This is not just an annoyance, this is an huge impediment toward successful
cloud product.
I kindly ask fesco to take this into consideration
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
de
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
> minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
> course we want Fedora to be internat
Hi,
yesterday and today this mirror caused yum to hang for
indefinite periods of time (waited over two minutes),
only c-c helps.
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
"instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
course we want Fedora to be international, but there are many cases
like Docker containers where no h
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
> concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
> reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta.
>
> The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawh
After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta.
The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawhide and f22
updates-testing. Am I right in thinking that we *don't*
In version 1.7-12 (-11 really but I did not package that) the license of R-zoo
changed from
GPL2
to
GPL2 or GPL3
so that there no changes from our point of view.
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
40 matches
Mail list logo
