- Original Message -
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:05:24 PM
Subject: RPM Weak Dependencies and the install media compose process
(Please keep the conversation on the
Hi
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed
that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora
packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel
(some even use reverse patches).
%autosetup was created to handle that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On 11/07/15 17:24, Haïkel wrote:
I fixed python-autopep8 as provenpackager.
Thank you! I had it on my plate and wanted to look at it today,
observing it was fixed already :D
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
From 1757cd211c53cad5ab5c21762672004e91b090ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:23:00 +0200
Subject: 1.14 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1c22400..93b56c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242141
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Unicode-Collate-1.14-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668414
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242138
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Coro-6.47-1.fc23
From 8250efacc4fe6ffdb2139332f641c825a523b6c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:15:35 +0200
Subject: 0.032 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 50311b1..e3fa011 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@
64c0e42f3a959c12b54c3874cb3ee80c Coro-6.47.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Coro/Coro-6.47.tar.gz/md5/64c0e42f3a959c12b54c3874cb3ee80c/Coro-6.47.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 96007cc6ddcaef2bc99908d92d0e313219ceaf55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:38:10 +0200
Subject: 1.08 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ccc8fa4..238f280 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242138
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
That's instance of bug #750805. Since perl-4:5.22.0-347, we propagate
distribution's CFLAGS from perl's build-time configuration to perl-Coro CFLAGS.
So hack for bug #750805 stopped working
3b04ec2a0353c5064fc01c1fe73d8225 Unicode-Normalize-1.19.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Unicode-Normalize/Unicode-Normalize-1.19.tar.gz/md5/3b04ec2a0353c5064fc01c1fe73d8225/Unicode-Normalize-1.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 6af815d10985791419f8e250aab7ba997fdd56c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:58:20 +0200
Subject: 1.19 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6a93700..e091fe6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239613
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1239338 (F23FTBFS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242141
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
9ba30f1bcf34a54be4567b8e121ef3da File-ShareDir-ProjectDistDir-1.08.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-ShareDir-ProjectDistDir/File-ShareDir-ProjectDistDir-1.08.tar.gz/md5/9ba30f1bcf34a54be4567b8e121ef3da/File-ShareDir-ProjectDistDir-1.08.tar.gz
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242138
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Coro-6.47-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668402
--
You are receiving this mail because:
460ba130102857d2524017e6d5d4ca17 Test-Moose-More-0.032.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Moose-More/Test-Moose-More-0.032.tar.gz/md5/460ba130102857d2524017e6d5d4ca17/Test-Moose-More-0.032.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
f9fd50a2dda54299160fc9e22748e996 Gtk3-0.022.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Gtk3/Gtk3-0.022.tar.gz/md5/f9fd50a2dda54299160fc9e22748e996/Gtk3-0.022.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 262d6599e1319b48fdd837819fff26f9a9fa2337 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:43:02 +0200
Subject: 6.47 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0e93ccd..d9d9a2d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -23,3
c486b31f87bfa3875883f3c9fad9fd99 Unicode-Collate-1.14.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Unicode-Collate/Unicode-Collate-1.14.tar.gz/md5/c486b31f87bfa3875883f3c9fad9fd99/Unicode-Collate-1.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Gtk3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk2-SourceView has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk2-SourceView-1.000-14.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(Gnome2::Print)
perl-Gtk2-SourceView-1.000-14.fc23.x86_64 requires
libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242138
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
It turned out that -Wp,-DFORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 produce a
warning about redefinition and resulting macro remains FORTIFY_SOURCE 2. If
macro is defined with -Wp, one has to
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
I think it's because no one told that it exists ;)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that
there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242224
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242138
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242138
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242142
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.19-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668447
--
You are receiving this
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 22:53 -0500, Jon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
...
From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to
go:
1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends:
packages
are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242229
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178388
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
From 844e0056ee6c54553aa3b4eac20fbc96150e09c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:49:38 +0200
Subject: Redefine FORTIFY_SOURCE properly
Since perl-4:5.22.0-347, we propagate distribution's CFLAGS from
perl's build-time
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch
perl-App-Asciio has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-App-Asciio-1.51.3-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl(App::Asciio::GTK::Asciio::stripes::wirl_arrow)
perl-App-Asciio-1.51.3-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl(App::Asciio::GTK::Asciio::stripes::editable_box2)
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242142
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Gtk3-0.022 fixed the real error caused by the gdk-pixbuf2 change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 105835
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242229
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Test-Moose-More-0.032-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668451
--
You are receiving this
This is going to be pretty common for anything that uses the bootstrap CSS
framework, since glyphicons is bundled as part of it. I do not see much benefit
from packaging this separately, especially as the license for the glyphicons
halflings font included with bootstrap is MIT, but CC-BY from
Hello Dave,
You will get the option which platform you want to have the rebuild
for, when you click resubmit.
IIRC even the platforms where the last build was successful will not
be selected by default.
Timotheus
On 14 July 2015 at 07:05, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
During the review of cppformat, it was pointed out that it contained a font
that should be removed because it's packaged with Fedora (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279#c3 ). While working on
resolving this, I was looking into what package provided this font so I
could add the
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/daveisfera/odb_2.4/build/102224/
What's the correct way to handle a single failed build on COPR? In the
above, it failed on F22 ppc64le. Will clicking resubmit rebuild on all of
the platforms? Or just the one that failed?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
it's quite new feature in rpmbuild:
http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup
I.e. since rpm-4.11.
Cheers,
Jindrich
On Jul 13, 2015 1:40 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that
there is no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178388
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Gtk3-0.022-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668466
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48119
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48119/0001-Ticket-48119-setup-needs-to-setup-suitespot-user-ID.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed
that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to
Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random
patchlevel (some even use reverse patches).
%autosetup was
From 2be4d28740697296cb30eaf107a6bb5a2c6b153a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:54:57 +0200
Subject: 0.022 bump
The xorg-x11-xinit does not seem to be needed anymore.
diff --git a/Gtk3-0.019-position.patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178388
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231897
Bug 1231897 depends on bug 1199972, which changed state.
Bug 1199972 Summary: perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc23 FTBFS: Can't use string (320) as
an ARRAY ref while strict refs in use at t/overrides.t line 235.
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 14:39 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because
implementation has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I
exclude laziness of package maintainers)?
rpm macros only get used if they work on the oldest OS
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
0 packages were orphaned
0 packages were retired
0 packages unorphaned
-
0 packages were unretired
0
W dniu 13.07.2015 o 15:22, Adam Jackson pisze:
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 14:39 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Is it because no one told that it exists? Or maybe because
implementation has some issues which no one wants to fix? Or other (I
exclude laziness of package maintainers)?
rpm macros
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Hi
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I
noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it
comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files
of random patchlevel (some
On 13.07.2015 16:40, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Agenda:
- define the minimal install
- define the docker base image
- minimal disk image for importing into libvirt
- generic installer?
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
s/June/July/g of course :-)
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178388
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|1199972 |perl-Gtk3-0.022-1.fc23
=
#fedora-meeting-1 Meeting
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-07-13/fedoraqa-devel.2015-07-13-14.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233444
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Compose started at Mon Jul 13 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
So, I'll reply here, but I'm replying in general to the thread not the
last post in particular. ;)
This topic seems to come up from time to time and we never really
solve it, but a mix of old and new ideas here I think has some
promise:
* There's movement to make an app for new package reviews
On 13/07/15 15:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Hi
When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I
noticed that there is no such thing as patch management when it
comes to Fedora packages. Everyone is using %patch
Agenda:
- define the minimal install
- define the docker base image
- minimal disk image for importing into libvirt
- generic installer?
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233444
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1239545
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|1199972 |perl-Gtk3-0.022-1.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231897
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
2015-07-13 16:20 GMT+02:00 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com:
maybe pull `rdopkg update-patches` into `fedpkg` ?
That's more or less, what I'll be suggesting in my patch management session
at Flock ;)
btw, rdopkg now handles properly %autosetup \o/
H.
cheers,
Pádraig.
--
devel mailing
No it didn't work ...
http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png
Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: pe...@thecodergeek.com
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:51:10 -0700
On 07/12/2015 10:38 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
Git hangs and didnt complete ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241727
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
New Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242625
From: moc...@hotmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: RE: Hangs with pkgs GIT
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:28:13 +0200
No it didn't work ...
http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png
Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT
To:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235489
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Socket-2.020-1.fc22
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1177
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
242
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1
93
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235491
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Tangerine-0.18-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235489
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235491
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Tangerine-0.18-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
BEDToolsverdurin 60 weeks ago
This has an annoying 'shrank by one' debuginfo problem and further
problems on 32-bit with recent GCC, but it is building on x86_64 now.
A bug has been filed regarding the problems and I'm pursuing them
upstream.
Adam
--
Is yum-utils going away, with dnf taking over?
--
Erik Johnson | Senior Engineer
3400 North Ashton Blvd, Suite 110 | Lehi, UT 84043
e...@saltstack.com | http://saltstack.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 13.07.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Erik Johnson:
Is yum-utils going away, with dnf taking over?
looks so - it makes me so terrible angry that we have to face eacg year
half done replacements of perfectly fine things
[root@rawhide ~]# package-cleanup --leaves
Yum-utils package has been
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48119
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48119/0001-Ticket-48119-Silent-install-needs-to-properly-exit-w.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:24:02 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Hosting git repos in phabricator
Phabricator has been capable of hosting git repos for a while now,
the holdup has been me getting everything ready to migrate on to a
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 15:21 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2015 09:13:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is anyone maintaining fedpkg now?
fedpkg has active maintainership and development. does not mean
that every corner case is know about of gets attention.
fedpkg might
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
