Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You're just 8 years late for noticing that:
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/tree/plugins/xsettings/gsd-xsettings-manager.c#n79
> and the explanation has been here for 4 years.
That is not the place I was talking about. That is the gnome-settings-daemon
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-08-03
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hey, look at me sending out an announcement this time! Next week we only
have a couple proposed blockers to go through: 1/2/1 (Alpha/Beta/Final).
Also, we have 5 proposed FEs to
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:47:41 +0100
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I noticed a lot of mirrors were giving me this error on a dnf
> update:
>
> [MIRROR] kernel-debug-modules-4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm: Downloading
> successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
> ff4ac555966b587f0
On 07/31/2015 11:07 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> Cannot log into KDE with kdbus, I get:
>>
>> $ cat .xsession-errors
>> startkde: Starting up...
>> startkde: Could not sync environment to dbus.
>
> This is UpdateActivationEnviro
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 14:26 -0700, derek wrote:
> from https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/thread
> .html#463627
Hi Derek!
It's a really interesting use case you have. It's just not one the
Fedora live stuff was ever designed for. The live stuff was built for a
different tim
On 31 July 2015 at 17:27, Radek Holy wrote:
> One can say that the mirrors should keep the older versions
I would completely agree. As we can't rely that packages referenced in
metadata just one day old still being on the mirrors means that
PackageKit has to download hundreds of megabytes month
On Thu, 30.07.15 19:57, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
> with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
> Rawhid
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:16AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 31.07.2015 um 05:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>Radek Holy wrote:
> >>>Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
> >>>f
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:26:24PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> In subsurface we will disable git integration because "it's not ready yeat
> in any way". What happens with gitg?
There was a bunch of commits yesterday fixing some api incompatibilities.
Another batch or two of like that and it shoul
Hi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Heya!
>>
>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
>> with built-in support, too now
On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
> with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
> Rawhide system adding "kdbus=1
On 07/30/2015 05:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>>> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our system
On 07/30/2015 09:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 04:54:18PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>>> added it to the Rawhide kernel
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 2:56:48 AM
> Subject: Re: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited
>
> Radek Holy wrote:
> > Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should
In subsurface we will disable git integration because "it's not ready yeat
in any way". What happens with gitg?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:21 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:31:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:31:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:06AM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I've sent patch to fedora's pygit2. Subsurface in upstream supports 0.23.0,
> > I will need some time to check what patches we need. Other packages as yo
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:16:57PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 13:31, Remi Collet wrote:
> > Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
> > > On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for catching that!
> > >
> > >> Do you want
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:43:42 +0100,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
I rebuilt all packages, except:
- js-of-ocaml - waiting on package review of a new dependency
- ocaml-camlimages
- FTBFS http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10514721
but may be a result of the re
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:49:26PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Any ideas on that one? This blocks qemu and all the rest of the virt
> stack.
Don't worry - I found the upstream bug with a fix:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4616
I'll try that.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
Ceph failed to build with some impenetrable C++ error:
In file included from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:28:0,
from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:19,
from ./include/encoding.h:289,
from ./include/uuid.h:8,
Note the the issue was a silent abi change in the libraries around dnf. Had we
not hit the atomic issue we would have pushed out the changed abi and likely
broken updates on end users systems. It is a good thing that we hit it when and
how we did.
Dennis
On July 31, 2015 3:54:18 AM CDT, Reindl
Hello everyone,
I'm a computer science enginner from France.
I'm in fond of computer science since my childhood.
I discover Linux and Opensource in 2008 when I join the University Institute of
Technology of Lille.
Since this day, I try a large number of Linux distributions and I very like the
op
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:06AM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I've sent patch to fedora's pygit2. Subsurface in upstream supports 0.23.0,
> I will need some time to check what patches we need. Other packages as you
> said compiles with new libgit2. Only one package dependes on python-pygit2,
> I
> * Firefox is still Gtk2 (and there is only one Martin Stránský
> working on the transition, and although he is an übermensch,
> the transition is still far from complete
It's been running on GTK3 in Fedora since F-22.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 13:31, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit :
> > On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for catching that!
> >
> >> Do you want me to file a bug ?
> >
> > Yes, please!
>
> FYI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Compose started at Fri Jul 31 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
- Original Message -
> Matěj Cepl wrote:
> > I take Gnumeric and Emacs, but all other ones are in-Gnome
> > projects, aren't they (at least having repository in
> > git.gnome.org)?
>
> Gnumeric is part of GNOME Office, so it is also under the GNOME umbrella
> these days.
>
> The thing i
On Thu, 30.07.15 14:20, Josh Boyer (jwbo...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> > For folks not keen to jump headfirst into Rawhide, is it expected that
> > this should work on Fedora 23 or Fedora 22 if one installs only the
> > kernel and systemd packages from Rawhide? That might make people more
> > com
Hi,
Today I noticed a lot of mirrors were giving me this error on a dnf update:
[MIRROR] kernel-debug-modules-4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm: Downloading
successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
ff4ac555966b587f06338475c8fcc0f41402b4c8e970e730f6f83b62be8b5c0d(sha256)
Expected:
995c85b3e6b
I've sent patch to fedora's pygit2. Subsurface in upstream supports 0.23.0,
I will need some time to check what patches we need. Other packages as you
said compiles with new libgit2. Only one package dependes on python-pygit2,
I adressed a bug.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:46 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote
I rebuilt all packages, except:
- js-of-ocaml - waiting on package review of a new dependency
- ocaml-camlimages
- FTBFS http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10514721
but may be a result of the recent RPM changes
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Re
Dne 31.7.2015 v 02:34 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> * the default DPI is now (at least in master) hardcoded to 96 instead
> of defaulting to the value actually reported by the hardware.
AdamW wrote lengthy post about DPI:
https://www.happyassassin.net/2015/07/09/of-dpis-desktops-and-toolkits/
Vít
-
On Thu, 30.07.15 16:59, Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 04:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> Heya!
> >>
> >> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> >> added it to the Rawhide kernel p
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:58:09PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora 23
>> and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions removed,
Am 31.07.2015 um 03:15 schrieb Johnny Robeson:
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing
atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still
some
sort of issue preventing it from com
Am 31.07.2015 um 10:46 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 31.07.2015 um 05:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Radek Holy wrote:
Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
fixed in dnf-1.0.2.
I still don't
Am 31.07.2015 um 05:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Radek Holy wrote:
Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
fixed in dnf-1.0.2.
I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache b
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 21:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> User over on users@ list reports booting Fedora 22 Workstation (live
>> media), and doing:
>>
>> # dnf install "Developer Tools"
>>
>> Implodes.
>>
>> I've reproduced the problem, an
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:42:29 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
>> Broken deps for x86_64
>
> Surprisingly, the report is incomplete and doesn't find some unresolvable
> dependencies. DNF doesn't either.
>
> An undefined %{epoch} in a d
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:42:29 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Broken deps for x86_64
Surprisingly, the report is incomplete and doesn't find some unresolvable
dependencies. DNF doesn't either.
An undefined %{epoch} in a dependency is not found. This has been reported
to blktap: https://bugz
40 matches
Mail list logo
