[HEADS-UP] jemalloc-4.0.0 for rawhide, please test

I'm about to push jemalloc-4.0.0 for rawhide. Scratch builds for f23 and f24 are available here: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/jemalloc/4.0.0/ There are a few packages that requires jemalloc, and they should be recompiled and tested against the new package. $ repoquery --whatrequires jemalloc |\

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14:34AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > I don't know if this has changed in he new age of having crazy human > > coding machines, but the last time i looked it was extremely difficult > > to see someone's sponsor and to generate statistics on sponsorship > > activities.

Re: bodhi 2 now live

On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version. "This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes" "This update has reached 14 days in testing and

Re: bodhi 2 now live

On 08/19/2015 10:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so we can prioritize them and get them fixed up. https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues Beware: Editing an update with a newer build will wipe out the update. Filed: https://gi

Re: bodhi 2 now live

On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version. "This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes" "This update has reached 14 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wish

Re: Rawhide plans

On 08/20/2015 01:07 AM, Eric Griffith wrote: Personally, if it weren't for the confusion, I think Fedora Next would be the perfect name for this. May-be, you guys are too young to know, but to me Fedora Next, would be a Fedora distribution addressing Steve Job/Apple's NeXt and advertising for

Re: Rawhide plans

On 08/19/2015 06:59 PM, Zach Villers wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:18:04 -0400 *Kevin Fenzi * wrote Greetings. We had some nice discussions about rawhide in my friday workshop at flock. I thought I would post here to get input from folks not there, and also allow peop

bodhi 2 now live

Greetings. After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that bodhi2 is now live in production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates or https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ The web interface should be available and working for adding and managing updates and build root overri

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, 19 Aug, 2015 at 23:09:00 GMT, Ben Cotton wrote: > I thought the "Fedora Tophat" suggestion was pretty awesome. I also > think the bike shed should be light gray. While we're tossing paint around, what about "Fedora Crest" (as in a wave)? It certainly is waves of updates day-after-day. I al

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On 08/19/2015 02:05 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: 2015-08-15 9:13 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : Recently we had discussion here about the queue of package reviews with FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag. I suggested to write some script which would query db and reveal those sponsors who does not make his duty. He

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Recently we had discussion here about the queue of package reviews with > FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag. > I suggested to write some script which would query db and reveal those > sponsors who does not make his duty. > > Here comes this script: > https://github.com/xsuchy/guard-f

Re: Rawhide plans

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 07:59:45AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Yeah, I thought about "Fedora Next". Mostly along the lines of "Hmmm, > > we've been talking about Fedora.Next for so long as something else that > > it might be really confusing, which is a shame, because it'd be a great > > nam

Re: Rawhide plans

On 8/20/15, Matthew Miller wrote: > Yeah, I thought about "Fedora Next". Mostly along the lines of "Hmmm, > we've been talking about Fedora.Next for so long as something else that > it might be really confusing, which is a shame, because it'd be a great > name for this". :) That's the scheme from

Re: Rawhide plans

Google informs me that was for Debian, nevermind! >.> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: > Come to think of it, wasn't there an initiative a few years ago to make > Rawhide more stable called "Fedora CUT" ? Continuously Usable Testing or > something similar > > On Wed, Aug 19,

Re: Rawhide plans

Come to think of it, wasn't there an initiative a few years ago to make Rawhide more stable called "Fedora CUT" ? Continuously Usable Testing or something similar On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > I thought the "Fedora Tophat" suggestion was pretty awesome. I also > think the

Re: Rawhide plans

I thought the "Fedora Tophat" suggestion was pretty awesome. I also think the bike shed should be light gray. -- Ben Cotton -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Rawhide plans

Personally, if it weren't for the confusion, I think Fedora Next would be the perfect name for this. But the confusion exists so... we either don't use it, or we -do- use it and Marketing makes an announcement that as as part of the continuously-changing plans of what defines "Fedora Next" they are

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:18:42PM -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: > Something akin to openSUSE's "Tumbleweed" name. > Maybe reuse the "Fedora.Next" name? Something that implies its rolling > release / pre-release. Fedora Testing? For some reason "Fedora Tophat" just > popped into my head as a pun on h

rawhide report: 20150819 changes

Compose started at Wed Aug 19 15:32:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.i686 requires libmpi.so.1 [adobe-source-libraries] adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-24.fc22.i686 requires lib

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-15 9:13 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : > Recently we had discussion here about the queue of package reviews with > FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag. > I suggested to write some script which would query db and reveal those > sponsors who does not make his duty. > > Here comes this script: >https://github

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:18:04 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 2. Upgrading from a stable release is also often hard due to broken deps, resulting in having to remove packages just to get upgraded. dnf works much better than yum for this. You can use distro-sync with the --allowerasing option t

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-08-20 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-08-20 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-08-20 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2015-08-20 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2015-08-20 1

Re: Rawhide plans

Kevin Fenzi composed on 2015-08-19 09:18 (UTC-0600): > Finally there was mention of the baggage associated with the name > "rawhide". To this day I see people telling others that "rawhide will > eat your babies" or "rawhide is a methlab and will blow up in your face > every day". Boo, hiss on th

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-08-19)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-08-19) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-08-19/fesco.2015-0 8-19-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It > > sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, > > then and only then look at renaming. > > s/renaming/rebranding/ > > I pe

Rescheduled: Planned Outage: fedorahosted lists migration - Now at: 2015-08-21 08:00 UTC

We ran into some issues importing archives, and so are going to fix those and retry the migration on friday (2015-08-21) at the same time. Sorry for any inconvenience. kevin -- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:39:53 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Planned Outage: fedorahosted lists migration - 2015-08-19 08

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It > > > sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, > > > then and only t

Re: Rawhide plans

Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It > > sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, > > then and only then look at renaming. > > s/renaming/rebranding/ > > I personally

Re: Rawhide plans

Rawhide rebrand: Something akin to openSUSE's "Tumbleweed" name. Maybe reuse the "Fedora.Next" name? Something that implies its rolling release / pre-release. Fedora Testing? For some reason "Fedora Tophat" just popped into my head as a pun on hats and being "ontop" of updates. On Aug 19, 2015 1:

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:18:04 -0400 Kevin Fenzi wrote Greetings. We had some nice discussions about rawhide in my friday workshop at flock. I thought I would post here to get input from folks not there, and also allow people who were there to comment more now tha

Re: Rawhide plans

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:51:26 -0700 Josh Stone wrote: > On 08/19/2015 08:18 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * Setup some gating. I think it should work like this: > > > > today you build a rawhide build and it tags into f24 tag, which is > > used by the daily compose. > > > > I'd like to change tha

Re: Rawhide plans

On 08/19/2015 08:18 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Setup some gating. I think it should work like this: > > today you build a rawhide build and it tags into f24 tag, which is used > by the daily compose. > > I'd like to change that to build into a f24-candidate tag. At that > point taskotron or oth

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:11:04AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/19/2015 06:36 AM, Dave Love wrote: > > Should MPI packages be OK to push in f23 currently? I've just had > > failures from auto-qa like this, though the build actually ran an MPI > > test successfully: > > > > not ok - dep

Re: Rawhide plans

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It > sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, > then and only then look at renaming. s/renaming/rebranding/ I personally would prefer the name be preserved if at all possible, but

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides

On 08/19/2015 06:36 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Should MPI packages be OK to push in f23 currently? I've just had > failures from auto-qa like this, though the build actually ran an MPI > test successfully: > > not ok - depcheck for Koji build scalasca-2.2.2-2.fc23 # FAIL > --- > arch:

Re: openmpi/python-related problems in epel7 ppc buildroot

On 08/19/2015 06:20 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Orion Poplawski writes: > >> On 08/18/2015 09:21 AM, Dave Love wrote: >>> I'm trying to build a new package. It's failing on epel-7-ppc64le >>> (only) with two sorts of errors in %check which appear to be problems >>> with the build root, e.g. >>>

F24 System Wide Change: Server Drop i686

= Proposed System Wide Change: Server Drop i686 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Server_Drop_i686 Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher Drop i686 install media for Fedora Server Edition == Detailed Description == The Fedora Server SIG has determined that we no longer feel that i686 insta

Rawhide plans

Greetings. We had some nice discussions about rawhide in my friday workshop at flock. I thought I would post here to get input from folks not there, and also allow people who were there to comment more now that it's not after 5pm on a friday of the 3rd day of flock. ;) * The problems/issues:

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-08-19)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-08-19 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides

Sandro Mani writes: >> Where are we with this? I see some F23 builds but no updates yet. >> >> >> Formally, this Change has been removed from the scope of F23 as it >> was not ready for Alpha, which is a requirement to have a Change in >> a release. >> However Zbyszek told me yesterday that

Re: openmpi/python-related problems in epel7 ppc buildroot

Orion Poplawski writes: > On 08/18/2015 09:21 AM, Dave Love wrote: >> I'm trying to build a new package. It's failing on epel-7-ppc64le >> (only) with two sorts of errors in %check which appear to be problems >> with the build root, e.g. >>

F-23 Branched report: 20150819 changes

Compose started at Wed Aug 19 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [QuantLib] QuantLib-test-1.6.1-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.58.0 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 18.8.2015 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi all, > > Today, I noticed that mock build root prepared by DNF is significantly > larger then prepared by YUM (see attached logs). Owners of packages > installed into minimal buildroot probably wants to review their > dependency chain. > > I also re

Re: ncurses update to 6.0

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:38:08PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > guestfish uses APIs from readline and libtinfo directly. It does not > use ncurses APIs directly. > So it is overlinked, but IIRC that's because you had to use > `-lreadline -lncurses' to make readline work properly on some old

Re: DNF - Update packages from specific repository with dependencies

If I use dnf repository-packages, update works, but it takes about 5 minutes to complete. Its not network issue or latency, because command yum-deprecated repository-packages works OK (update takes about 30secs to complete on fedora 22). Same thing on Fedora 20 with yum repository-packages (update

Re: DNF - Update packages from specific repository with dependencies

On 19. 8. 2015 at 09:05:47, Zelja Tux wrote: > I tried the deprecated command yum and it works: > yum-deprecated -y repository-packages MYREPO update > yum-deprecated -y repo-pkgs MYREPO update > > Also this command is right solution, if all packages have same prefix (but > my packages doesnt have

Re: DNF - Update packages from specific repository with dependencies

I tried the deprecated command yum and it works: yum-deprecated -y repository-packages MYREPO update yum-deprecated -y repo-pkgs MYREPO update Also this command is right solution, if all packages have same prefix (but my packages doesnt have same prefix, and I don't want to hardcode all package na