# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-02-29
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have a few proposed blockers to review, so let's take a
look at them. There is 1 proposed Alpha blocker, 2 proposed Beta
blockers, and 3 proposed Final blockers.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-02-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow! There have been big changes to
composes lately, so it's probably
On 02/18/2016 01:39 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
Non-Red Hat customers running CentOS usually have a much easier task
of enabling EPEL, although there can still be some issues.
Yes it is a bit odd to me that the free CentOS is in many respects
easier to use than the paid RHEL.
Would be nice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312614
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-cpm-0.115-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d824a96838
--
You are receiving this mail
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 02:20:20PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the process of adopting the PyOpenGL package, I've updated it to
> comply with modern python packaging practices and renamed the package
> to python-PyOpenGL. That of course triggers a package review, so if
> anyone
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size
Hi folks!
So, I spent most of this week rewriting my 'fedfind' tool for the new
world of Pungi 4 composes. The work is currently on the 'pungi4'
branch:
https://www.happyassassin.net/cgit/fedfind/log/?h=pungi4
I'm more or less happy with what I've got now, but it makes some rather
large API
From 73b7c1ce26c9b66ccd8183268a130e67b3048119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 02:15:42 +0100
Subject: 0.115 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
From 73b7c1ce26c9b66ccd8183268a130e67b3048119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 02:15:42 +0100
Subject: 0.115 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
From 73b7c1ce26c9b66ccd8183268a130e67b3048119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 02:15:42 +0100
Subject: 0.115 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
3e9d5198f7bcd593556226c69d058866 App-cpm-0.115.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-App-cpm/App-cpm-0.115.tar.gz/md5/3e9d5198f7bcd593556226c69d058866/App-cpm-0.115.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312620
Bug ID: 1312620
Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0124 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312618
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13154894
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312618
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1131178
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1131178=edit
[patch] Update to 20160301 (#1312618)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312618
Bug ID: 1312618
Summary: perltidy-20160301 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perltidy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312614
Bug ID: 1312614
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.115 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/26/2016 05:01 AM, john tatt wrote:
> Hi
>
> Do you think you will build it also for i386 arch ?
>
> Thx
>
>
I don't think COPR supports 32-bit for EPEL-7 ... So, no plans at the
moment.
- --
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/27/2016 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:17:39 + (UTC) john tatt
> wrote:
>
>> Hi I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the
>> dependencies ?
>
> Thats not going to work. Xfce has
From d45b1272a635aeb34065aac6d0b8c003589aa861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 00:27:58 +0100
Subject: Modernize spec file
---
perl-XML-Tiny.spec | 35 ++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
From ed112965d6c06e9f60fb226861b17d210759b744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 00:14:55 +0100
Subject: Modernize spec file
---
perl-XML-Bare.spec | 38 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:18:35PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 27-02-16 23:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:03:57PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
> >>error:
> >>
> >>ldd -r
Hi,
On 27-02-16 23:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:03:57PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
error:
ldd -r /usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so
undefined symbol: __cpu_model (/usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so)
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:03:57PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
> error:
>
> ldd -r /usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so
>
>
>
> undefined symbol: __cpu_model (/usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so)
How do you link the shared
Hi All,
I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
error:
ldd -r /usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so
undefined symbol: __cpu_model (/usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so)
I've found this out by build failures like this one:
/usr/bin/ld: conftest: hidden symbol
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 20:57 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
> to install glibc-langpack-en.
Different case. The issue of how to handle upgrade of existing installs
is already being discussed upthread. I was pointing out a
And also I was not able to start gnome-terminal and some other apps. I had
to install glibc-langpack-en.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016, 9:44 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now
From 1bf997b60569612acf0a7ad57f19f0d248880101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:20:47 +
Subject: Update to 3.0212
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 3.0212
-
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS.git/commit/?h=perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0212-1.fc25=1bf997b60569612acf0a7ad57f19f0d248880101
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 04:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size
From 1bf997b60569612acf0a7ad57f19f0d248880101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:20:47 +
Subject: Update to 3.0212
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 3.0212
-
From 1bf997b60569612acf0a7ad57f19f0d248880101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:20:47 +
Subject: Update to 3.0212
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 3.0212
-
75982c59e74b9322420c9f63ab43 Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0212.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS/Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0212.tar.gz/md5/75982c59e74b9322420c9f63ab43/Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0212.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Hi
I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the dependencies ?
J
De : Kevin Fenzi
À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc : john tatt
Envoyé le : Samedi 27 février 2016 21h02
Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion
i just stumbled over the following error while using bodhi on f22:
bodhi --buildroot-override=openvas-libraries-8.0.7-2.f22 --duration=2
--notes='new libraries needed for new manager'
No handlers could be found for logger "fedora.client.bodhi"
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:50:42 -0600
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I'm actually just going to submit a review for a python2-setuptools
> dummy package to take care of the most annoying case. If someone
> really dislikes this idea enough to block that, then I guess I'll
> find
Q:
Do you understand the purpose of RHSCL PR EPEL? ;)
You want RHEL, but neither RHSCL nor EPEL is it, nor designed to be it.
That's why I said ...
EPEL's ideal aimpoint, when feasible, should be like RHSCL. ;)
-- bjs
DISCLAIMER: Sent from phone, please excuse any typos
--
Bryan J Smith -
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 27/02/16 04:51, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>
>> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/devtoolset2/epel-6-x86_64/00163443-devtoolset-2-valgrind/build.log.gz
>> It looks like the valgrind build process is
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Felix Schwarz
wrote:
> Also as a sysadmin I dislike that stuff in EPEL can change at any time
> (whenever the maintainer can not support the old version anymore). If EPEL had
> some kind of "release" (e.g. tied to RHEL point releases)
Hi,
I'll orphan rabbitvcs, yes again.
Since we removed the former maintainer cause of a nonresponsive issue (FPC
ticket available), I took over and tried to fix the rabbitvcs package and think
it's now in a reasonable state to rudimentally work again. Unfortunately,
upstream is dormant and
Hi,
does anyone know how to reach the maintainers of i7z and 7kaa packages?
If not, then I want to open individual nonresponsive maintainer tickets.
~R.
i7z
---
FTBFS in rawhide
1 open abrt bugs
available patch requested
[19:19:37] User: fantom, Name: Matthieu Saulnier, email:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312568
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Diff-1.44-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-be582ec14d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312568
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Diff-1.44-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-be582ec14d
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update
From e3edd2356a134aa81a673681dfb202f0dcd88afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:05:56 +0100
Subject: 1.44 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Text-Diff.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
From 9a4a8c6f77a79a709d844642ea655967ddf3cd86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:16:23 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Text-Diff.spec | 5 -
1 file changed,
From 9a4a8c6f77a79a709d844642ea655967ddf3cd86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:16:23 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Text-Diff.spec | 5 -
1 file changed,
From e3edd2356a134aa81a673681dfb202f0dcd88afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:05:56 +0100
Subject: 1.44 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Text-Diff.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
From e3edd2356a134aa81a673681dfb202f0dcd88afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:05:56 +0100
Subject: 1.44 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Text-Diff.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
From e3edd2356a134aa81a673681dfb202f0dcd88afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:05:56 +0100
Subject: 1.44 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Text-Diff.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
1f0bcd24b64b50a29ad1cf997c2247e9 Text-Diff-1.44.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Text-Diff/Text-Diff-1.44.tar.gz/md5/1f0bcd24b64b50a29ad1cf997c2247e9/Text-Diff-1.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
psabata set the monitor flag of perl-Text-Diff to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
>
Hi,
In the process of adopting the PyOpenGL package, I've updated it to
comply with modern python packaging practices and renamed the package
to python-PyOpenGL. That of course triggers a package review, so if
anyone would like to help me out with that, it's here:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 21:01, Dave Johansen
> wrote:
> > It looks like EPEL 5/6 have old versions of scl-utils. Those are probably
> > added back at a point when the base OS didn't have
On 02/26/2016 10:38 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:06 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> Correct, 'glibc-all-langpacks' will solve the problem immediately.
>
> OK, I've added this to comps, to take care of new installs. If anyone
> implements support for language pack
On 02/26/2016 10:39 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
No languages are available by default, we did this because
From 68be258587f18e0044288cd9c551d59725efac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:21:37 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.20 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 5 -
sources
From 68be258587f18e0044288cd9c551d59725efac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:21:37 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.20 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 5 -
sources
From 68be258587f18e0044288cd9c551d59725efac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:21:37 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.20 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 5 -
sources
From 68be258587f18e0044288cd9c551d59725efac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:21:37 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.20 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 5 -
sources
From 68be258587f18e0044288cd9c551d59725efac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:21:37 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.20 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 5 -
sources
I took zsh-lovers.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 68be258587f18e0044288cd9c551d59725efac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:21:37 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.20 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 5 -
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312568
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13149286
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312568
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1131083
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1131083=edit
[patch] Update to 1.44 (#1312568)
--
You are
abd551b08701ce7020d5ed63a5ba33e3 File-Edit-Portable-1.20.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-Edit-Portable/File-Edit-Portable-1.20.tar.gz/md5/abd551b08701ce7020d5ed63a5ba33e3/File-Edit-Portable-1.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312568
Bug ID: 1312568
Summary: perl-Text-Diff-1.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-Diff
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310327
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi All,
I'm unretiring gkrellm-sun, the main reason for this is that
the 2 open gkrellm bugs we've:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231394
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246086
Both are actually in gkrellm-sun, and are a simple case
of a double free.
Since these 2
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:10:07 -0700
schrieb Kevin Fenzi :
> I have orphaned all these packages now.
>
> Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on.
>
I took this one:
> rpms/dvdbackup -- Command line tool for ripping video DVDs ( master
> f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6
Hi
it seems to come without windows manager. Had to uninstall.
De : Mukundan Ragavan
À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 février 2016 0h15
Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7
-BEGIN PGP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285421
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed:
What|Removed |Added
What crap is irccloud? Well, for 4€ /month you can run your own Fedora server
completely free of commercial services, and you won't get logged out after just
2 hours of inactivity. Please care about software licenses before you spam this
devel list for things that are not relevant for Fedora.
72 matches
Mail list logo