> Hi,
>
> my ThinkPad X220 runs Fedora 23 with automatic updates, Chromium and
> Spotify Copr. Up until Friday night, it worked just fine.
>
> Friday afternoon the new Kernel 4.4.5 was installed. It was only loaded
> on Saturday when I started the machine in the afternoon. I suspended the
> lapto
This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in
f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by some
other gnome packages.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016, 12:55 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:23:09PM +0300, Pete Walter wrote:
> >
On 17.3.2016 16:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi Fedorains,
I was thinking about creating a 3D printing SIG in Fedora. Would anyone
be interested in that?
Miro
We now have a mailing list [1].
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/3dprinting.lists.fedoraproject.org/
--
Miro Hrončok
--
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:29:06 +0100, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> https://github.com/pavlix/network-testing
->
#dnf copr enable pavlix/network-testing
#dnf install network-testing-deps
Error: nothing provides dhcpcd needed by
network-testing-deps-0.0.1-0.17.20160307git.fc23.x86_64
(try to add '--
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:25:43AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> It might be nice to provide some RPM macros to make that easier for
> packagers.
It is a simple one-liner if you use gpgv2:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/youtube-dl.git/tree/youtube-dl.spec#n35
Thank you for raising aw
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Images in this compose but not 24-20160320.n.0:
Xfce live x86_64
Lxde live x86_64
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Xfce live i386
Jam_kde live x86_64
Jam_kde live i386
Scientific_kde live i386
Lxde live i386
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 24
Alpha. The meeting is going to be held on Wednesday, March 23rd, 2016
17:00 UTC. Please check the [Fedocal] link for your time zone.
This meeting is a second attempt
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
2 packages were orphaned
perl-Devel-BeginLift [f23, master] was orphaned by ppisar
Make selected sub calls evaluate at compile time
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/p
OLD: Fedora-24-20160320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B
Size of downgraded
Hi,
we are pleased to announce an alpha version of our network application
testsuite and we invite you to participate. We are especially interested in
tests for specific packages that contain client and/or server software that are
not included yet.
We are currently testing a small set of packa
On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 10:25 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Michael, you make a very good point at
> https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/03/13/do-you-trust-this-packa
> ge/
>
> Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream
> publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of sour
Missing expected images:
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160320.n.0:
Kde live i386
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Design_suite live i386
Cloud_base vagrant-libvirt i386
Docker_base docker x86_64
Design_suite live x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Jam_kde live x86_64
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:23:09PM +0300, Pete Walter wrote:
>20.03.2016, 10:49, "Igor Gnatenko" :
>
> I'm updating libgit2 stack to 0.24.0 in rawhide.
>
>*
>Can you do it in F24 as well, please?
Based on how much libgit2/pygit2 break their API, I very much doubt this is a
good
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.10 GiB
Size of
20.03.2016, 10:49, "Igor Gnatenko" :I'm updating libgit2 stack to 0.24.0 in rawhide. Can you do it in F24 as well, please? Thanks--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Michael, you make a very good point at
https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/03/13/do-you-trust-this-package/
Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream
publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the
package *must* verify those signatures as part of
From 93e7e86d91e756126eada2d5b38bf78275f92a54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Fateyev
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:13:02 +0600
Subject: perl-File-Edit-Portable: 1.24 release
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Edit-Portable.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
17 matches
Mail list logo
