On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:09:11 -0700
> Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> > I'm renaming breathe [1] to python-breathe [2]. I just tried to retire
> > breathe in f22 using the instructions on the wiki [3] and got the
> > following error:
> > Could not reti
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.2
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 257.14 MiB
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Images in this compose but not 24-20160408.n.0:
Kde live i386
Xfce live x86_64
Mate live i386
Mate live x86_64
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Jam_kde live x86_64
Cinnamon live i386
Games
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160408.n.0
Images in Rawhide-20160408.n.0 but not this
OLD: Fedora-24-20160408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160408.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 74
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 484.57 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 686.37 MiB
Size of
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-04-11
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We have a few follow ups from last
week and an upcoming Test Day,
# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-04-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have a few proposed blockers to review, so let's take a
look at them. There is 1 proposed Beta blocker and there are 2 proposed
Final blockers...so it might be a sh
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.13 GiB
Size of
Planned Outage: buildsystem and related - 2016-04-12 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-04-12 21:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-04-
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:08:21AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-08/fesco.2016-04-08-17.00.log.html
[...]
18:01:51 No one reads the FESCo minutes...
^ FALSE!
:)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel maili
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-08)
===
Meeting started by paragan at 17:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-08/fesco.2016-04-08-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:36:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 10:28 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > With what we now know about malicious actors targeting the system boot
> > chain (even down to the firmware), this kind of TPM-based work is a
> > vital part of helping keep our us
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:23:07AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I'm curious how you would predict hash of initramfs because it is
> generated on the host and depends on dracut configuration and presence
> of various optionally installed packages.
initrd is certainly a more difficult one. One thing
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:09:23AM +, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The TPM style of remote attest is quite unfriendly to free software.
> It puts basically the entire operating system in the trusted domain,
> and you cannot change even a bit of it without "breaking the seal".
> So if you want any
On Friday, April 8, 2016 1:02:40 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This applies just for Rawhide, right?
>
> Vít
Nope, we have no way to set it for just one target. everything using dnf has
it set.
Dennis
> Dne 7.4.2016 v 18:40 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Following the decision of
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not 24-20160407.n.2
No images in 24-20160407.n.2 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 3/53 (x86_6
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016, at 05:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Remote attestation only works with a trusted counterpart who rejects
> access once a breach is detected. Who do you expect to be the
> counterpart for Fedora users? Is there anyone who offers such a service
> without also requiring to u
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160407.n.5
No images in Rawhide-20160407.n.5 but not this.
Fail
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016, at 05:23 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I'm curious how you would predict hash of initramfs because it is
> generated on the host and depends on dracut configuration and presence
> of various optionally installed packages.
That's true for a system managed by yum/dnf, but rpm-ostre
On 04/08/2016 12:30 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>Please note that I feel only one ticket is there in this week that
> need discussion. If any other existing open ticket need to be
> discussed then we can discuss that in the meeting but I am adding only
> one new ticket on the Agenda of this m
OLD: Fedora-24-20160407.n.2
NEW: Fedora-24-20160408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B
Size of downgraded
I not sure what's going on here. I keep getting these emails but it's
showing fc24 but I've built a rawhide package since then (showing fc25 dist
tag):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750028
trustedqsl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
tqsllib-
> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:54:36 -0400
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes:
> > >>
> > >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This applies just for Rawhide, right?
Vít
Dne 7.4.2016 v 18:40 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> Hi All,
>
> Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed
into the
> buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160407.n.5
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 19
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 340.24 KiB
Size of dropped packages:762.26 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 324.88
On 04/08/2016 10:28 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> With what we now know about malicious actors targeting the system boot
> chain (even down to the firmware), this kind of TPM-based work is a
> vital part of helping keep our users secure.
On the other hand, it can easily be abused to restrict user
On 2016-04-08, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Doing this well involves knowing what the expected values are to begin
> with. Some of these values come from the firmware, and so we can't do
> much about them without the assistance of the system vendors. But these
> values don't tend to change over the
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
[snip]
> Remote attestation is a mechanism by which a remote machine can request
> (but not compel) another machine to provide evidence of the PCR state.
> The TPM provides a signed bundle of information including the PCR values
> and the even
Some people who installed the Fedora 24 Alpha from scratch on bare-metal
BIOS-based systems may have found that their system didn't boot. Sorry
about that - it's my fault, and it's fixed now. But it happened as a
result of some new code in grub that gives us some really exciting
functionality.
Dne 8.4.2016 v 04:03 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> Has this change and the mapping which buildroot uses dnf rsp. yum been
> reflected to the mock packages [1]?
Yes. Mock used DNF for rawhide for ages to test this setup before it landed in
Koji and we have been waiting for
necessary code change in
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160331.n.0:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Soas raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz ar
31 matches
Mail list logo
