> Is there any alternative dnf command to list these "hidden" groups?
"dnf grouplist hidden" works as in yum. But it seems undocumented. /Lef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 01:30 +, Vinu Moses wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using F24_RC-1.2. After a fresh install of the server variant
> (Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-24-1.2.iso), when I try to list all
> available groups with "dnf grouplist", I do not get all available
> groups. For example, groups like
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-06-21 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
Hello,
I'm using F24_RC-1.2. After a fresh install of the server variant
(Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-24-1.2.iso), when I try to list all available groups
with "dnf grouplist", I do not get all available groups. For example, groups
like gnome and virtualization are not listed. However, when I do a
So, I'm trying to follow the retire instructions to retire nc6 and update
comps, and I noticed a discrepancy between the instructions for updating
the comps, and the actual state of the comps files.
Running the xsltproc command at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_pa
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:02 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way
> > through it for nc6.
> >
> > Background:
> >
> > * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it
> hasn't
> > been removed from comps entirely)
**
*Uhh that was weird. *
*
Modularity WG Meeting
===
Reminder! Meeting[1] tomorrow (Jun 21) 15h UTC in #fedora-meeting-3.
Agenda[2]. Please add any ideas/questions you may have.
[1]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/modularity/
[2]: http://piratepa
Modularity WG Meeting
===
Reminder! Meeting[1] tomorrow (Jun 21) 15h UTC in #fedora-meeting-3. Agenda[2]. Please add any ideas/questions you may have.
[1]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/modularity/
[2]:
> I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way
> through it for nc6.
>
> Background:
>
> * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it hasn't
> been removed from comps entirely)
> * nc6 should also be obsoleted by nmap-ncat with nc, but it never wa
Hi all,
I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way
through it for nc6.
Background:
* nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it hasn't
been removed from comps entirely)
* nc6 should also be obsoleted by nmap-ncat with nc, but it never was.
In
Dne 20.6.2016 v 15:14 Karsten Hopp napsal(a):
>
> Copy doesn't allow multiple builds with the same N-V-R either according to
> this:
> https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#WhathappenswhenItrytobuildapackagewiththesameversionnumber
Yes. But you can have the same NEVRA in different project
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
5 packages were orphaned
libntlm [epel7] was orphaned by till
NTLMv1 authentication library
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/libntlm
rhncfg [f23, f22, m
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:18:59PM +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> The current idea is to use the dist tag for this and let privileged users or
> koji itself (based on some rules) overwrite the %dist tag for builds of
> module components. This lets us automate those builds fairly easily.
Obviously +1
Am 20.06.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Miroslav Suchý:
Dne 20.6.2016 v 14:18 Karsten Hopp napsal(a):
Does anyone have any other ideas for this problem ?
Rebuild it in Copr?
>
Copy doesn't allow multiple builds with the same N-V-R either according
to this:
https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDo
Dne 20.6.2016 v 14:18 Karsten Hopp napsal(a):
> Does anyone have any other ideas for this problem ?
Rebuild it in Copr?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 10/83 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
ID: 23396 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23396
ID: 23400 Test: x
Hi all,
One month ago Petr Šabata posted a module build proposal here on this
list. [1]
I'd like to gather some ideas about the very first of his key points as
it poses some problems with our current buildsystem:
> - building a module means building the components it contains and
> composing
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160619.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160620.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 17
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Hi
weld-core package changes from ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and (CDDL or GPLv2
with exceptions) to
ASL 2.0 and (CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions) and LGPLv2+ and MIT and OFL
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedorapr
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:18:06PM +, Christopher wrote:
> The last information I found about nc on this mailing list is that nc was
> obsoleted by nmap-ncat. Can anybody tell me if this is accurate? Am I just
> giving myself a headache for no reason? Should nc and nc6 simply be dropped
> entir
20 matches
Mail list logo
