Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: why the Group tag is obsolete ?]

On Sex, 2016-10-28 at 00:23 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Many thanks by your reply, yes or creterepo could use appdata > > directly, > > makes sense improve createrepo with appdata, btw I noticie, apper > > (kde > > software manager) on Fedora 24 fails on search groups

Self Introduction: Brad Hubbard

Hello all, Some of you may have seen me around before under my preferred nick of badone as I've lurked in open source and software circles in general for countless eons. I started doing software support and development during the late Permian period working on a couple of DG systems and then HP

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > I kinda hate kicking off discussions like this without having a solid > solution to propose or being able to promise to work on one, but this > really seems important. Unfortunately I can't claim

DNF and PackageKit background data usage

Hi folks! I kinda hate kicking off discussions like this without having a solid solution to propose or being able to promise to work on one, but this really seems important. Unfortunately I can't claim I'm gonna have time to do any concrete work on it, though I'd really *like* to. But I thought

Re: ppc64 and ppc64le builds coming to rawhide

On Friday, October 28, 2016 2:54:19 PM CDT Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > over the weekend we will be importing and enabling ppc64 and ppc64le builds > in koji.fedoraproject.org as part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ > Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures The import and

Re: ppc64 and ppc64le builds coming to rawhide

On Friday, October 28, 2016 2:54:19 PM CDT Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > over the weekend we will be importing and enabling ppc64 and ppc64le builds > in koji.fedoraproject.org as part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ > Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures The import and

Re: Slow configure scripts

On Thursday, October 27, 2016 3:23:25 PM CDT Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 24/10/16 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote: > > I recall some reports that configure scripts are really slow in recent > > Fedora versions due to pervasive use of BIND_NOW. > > > > Has anyone investigated this further? Is there a

Re: Self Introduction: Evan Klitzke

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Evan Klitzke wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Evan Klitzke and I've been a Fedora user for more than ten years > now. I'm interested in taking the next steps and contributing to the Fedora > project more meaningfully by becoming a package maintainer. Welcome!

Self Introduction: Evan Klitzke

Hi, My name is Evan Klitzke and I've been a Fedora user for more than ten years now. I'm interested in taking the next steps and contributing to the Fedora project more meaningfully by becoming a package maintainer. My interests include software development of all kinds, particularly in C++,

Re: Slow configure scripts

On 27/10/16 20:19, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 27/10/16 17:09, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 3:23:25 PM CEST Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 24/10/16 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote: I recall some reports that configure scripts are really slow in recent Fedora versions due

Fedora Rawhide-20161029.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161028.n.0): ID: 44830 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/44830 ID: 44896 Test: x86_64

[EPEL-devel] Re: Desktop application major update (darktable)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507#c9 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161029.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161029.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 49 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 306.44 KiB Size of dropped packages

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

Fedora 25-20161029.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Server boot x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Server dvd x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161026.n.0): ID:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Branched 20161029.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 25 Branched 20161029.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: %{python3_pkgversion} tag

Il 27/10/2016 02:51, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: > On 10/26/2016 05:16 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: >> A proven packager edited one of the python libraries I maintain, to add >> some useful stuff. Among all the edits he made, there is one in >> particular that made me write this message. >>