Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-03-26)

2017-03-25 Thread till
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Review swaps

2017-03-25 Thread Jerry James
The latest version of the python-ZODB package has a couple of new build dependencies that aren't yet in Fedora. Both of these are very small, very simple packages. I'm happy to swap reviews for these two: python-j1m.sphinxautointerface: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435920 python-

Fedora 26-20170325.n.0 compose check report

2017-03-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 18/108 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170323.n.0): ID: 70573 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

Modularity and lifecycle [was Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?]

2017-03-25 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > As I already mentioned in person when this came up in a DevConf talk, I > think that this is a plan that will likely break a lot of things, especially > the expectations all our users rely on (that everything in Everything has a > c

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

2017-03-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Fenzi: > So, we have been talking about how to distribute things more, and we > could also consider just moving it to a more central location. It would be nice to have a URL with truly static content, to mostly rule out application server load issues. For a worst-case connection without

Fedora Rawhide-20170325.n.0 compose check report

2017-03-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/107 (x86_64), 6/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170324.n.0): ID: 70476 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/70476 ID: 70508 Test: x86_64 univ

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

2017-03-25 Thread Björn Persson
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 23.03.2017 um 12:26 schrieb Athos Ribeiro: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:14:58AM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > >> I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with > >> performance of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. > >> Github, but it'

Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?

2017-03-25 Thread Björn Persson
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 03/23/2017 08:28 AM, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017, at 11:14 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > >> I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with > >> performance of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. > >> Github, but it's bearable. How

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

2017-03-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 03/25/2017 05:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: ...snip... >> I know we all are humans which are not perfect but this is a a no-go >> that should never happen! > > Sure but software is complex, and human's can also be nice! Quite right. Als

nonresponsive package maintainer

2017-03-25 Thread Artem Kononov
scim-tables package administrator dchen seems nonresponsive. Doesn't seem to be on vacation. Link to the open bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419389 Though sure enough this particular feature request is far from being critical ___ dev

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

2017-03-25 Thread Utkarsh Anand
>tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the users! So much dissatisfaction for something you're not even paying for! 😦 On Mar 25, 2017 16:32, "Heiko Adams" wrote: > tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the > users! > > Hi there, > I'm a little bit

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

2017-03-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the > users! There is absolutely no need to use language like that or refer to people's work as such. > Hi there, > I'm a little bit angry about the latest NM update. But from the

Wifi was broken after latest NM update

2017-03-25 Thread Heiko Adams
tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the users! Hi there, I'm a little bit angry about the latest NM update. But from the beginning: My system has been fresh installed from a Fedora 26 Workstation Live-CD two weeks ago and ran without any big issue so far. Today I applie

Re: How risky is lm_sensors's sensors-detect nowadays?

2017-03-25 Thread Andrew Toskin
Friday, 24 March 9:27 a.m. -, Jeff Bastian wrote: > Can Freon check if sensors-detect has been run before, and if not, pop > up a dialog box asking to run it and warn about the risks? Yes, if you haven't run `sensors-detect` yet, Freon says that you need to do so instead of showing the hardwa