On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:34:33 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just letting you all know that as part of the redefinition of
> Alternative Architectures[1] we have just enabled the building of
> s390x in primary koji. this is the last new architecture we are
> planning to enable at this
I think that developers should be asked this question.
As DNF is a software originally made by Fedora people
I think it's correct to crosspost to devel@fpo hoping to
get an answer from the DNF authors or at least from
somebody who can explain what they meant.
Just to summarize the story: somebody
Hello.
gnustep-base must be updated to the release 1.25.0.
I created a buildroot-override
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/gnustep-base-1.25.0-2.fc26)
for rebuilding its dependencies so, please, rebuild and commit a new
release of following packages in f26:
unar (successfully rebuilt)
o
Am 29.04.2017 um 16:01 schrieb Antonio Trande:
Hello.
gnustep-base must be updated to the release 1.25.0.
I created a buildroot-override
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/gnustep-base-1.25.0-2.fc26)
for rebuilding its dependencies so, please, rebuild and commit a new
release of followin
On 28 April 2017 at 21:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
> You do keep saying that it's easy. What I'm saying is that it's easy to
> say things are easy, but... from experience, usually they are not. If
> it *is* that easy, why not make a proof of concept? In any case, taking
> them to the RPM project ups
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On 28 April 2017 at 21:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> You do keep saying that it's easy. What I'm saying is that it's easy to
>> say things are easy, but... from experience, usually they are not. If
>> it *is* that easy, why not make a proof
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 17/116 (x86_64), 7/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 88783 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88783
ID: 88797 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_up
Hi!
I'm trying it under F25. First, thanks for working on it! It'd be a
great feature. However:
1. I run it, and it was running for too long (probably 10 minutes!) with
absolutely no log. I found that it is working on a 200M
filelists.xml.gz.part file in DNF cache (which is apparently an
un
On 29 April 2017 at 18:29, Neal Gompa wrote:
> There's plenty of stuff going on in rpm.org upstream. You can look for
> yourself: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm
Seems none is going to provide %doc and %lang() generalisation to
allow mark more than current 5 classes of the files wi
On 29 April 2017 at 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
> but you are coming in several threads and tell everybody that Fedora has to
> be built completly different while the logical answer would be: well, if
> everything in Fedora is not the way you like it then Fedora probably just
> isn't for you?
Is
On 29 April 2017 at 22:30, Reindl Harald wrote:
> given that i run Fedora fpr a decade on everyting from production servers to
> routers and desktops and reading all of your posts of the last week - well,
> i have no idea what your problem is
Looks like we have completely different jobs .. just a
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
Hi,
I was trying to push an update to stable and received a mail with this
notification [1], anyone experienced a similar response recently,
seems the version comparison fails. Also wonder why fc24 update is
being tried to push to fc25.
[1]
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/3e2df
On Sun, 2017-04-30 at 09:24 +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to push an update to stable and received a mail with this
> notification [1], anyone experienced a similar response recently,
> seems the version comparison fails. Also wonder why fc24 update is
> being tried to pu
15 matches
Mail list logo
