Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

Le 24/08/2017 à 02:32, Moez Roy a écrit : > The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so > I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9. Such a version bump in stable branch is not acceptable. ImageMagick 7 removed lot of functions (deprecated in v6) Especially as

Re: Self-introduction

Hi Zbyszek, On 13 August 2017 at 12:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11.8.2017 08:25, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > >Hello, > > > > > >My name is Elliott, but you may know me as QuLogic on > >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 899 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 661 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 243

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 777 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 771 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 661

Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

Hi all, An ImageMagick update (6.9 => 7.0) with an SONAME bump and other breakage has been pushed to F25 and higher. First, the update introduces regressions on s390x and ppc64 arches. - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484578 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484579

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On 08/23/2017 07:32 PM, Moez Roy wrote: The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9. I tagged this update now for Updates Testing for f25 & f26 as it is an urgent fix. It is also in build root override so affected packages can

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On 08/23/2017 07:32 PM, Moez Roy wrote: The soname bump requires packages that depend on it need to be rebuilt, so I updated ImageMagick to 7.0.6-9. I tagged this update now for Updates Testing for f25 & f26 as it is an urgent fix. It is also in build root override so affected packages

Re: COPR strategy

Hey, I am currently maintaining llvm trunk and mesa git snapshot repos for f25 and f26 at: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/che. One thing i would love to see is the ability to have a buildrepo and a release repo and beeing able to sync from build to release once a complete buildchain

[Bug 1469110] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1481915] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481915 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1481915] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481915 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

Peter Jones wrote: > It is still built as grub2-pc{,-modules}, just built a bit differently. It is not. There is no grub2-pc in dist-git, and grub2 has this ExcludeArch: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2/blob/master/f/grub2.spec#_57 It is not enough to build the 32-bit PC/BIOS grub2 on

Re: [modularity] Modularizing the world fast and iteratively

Adam Samalik wrote: > all their dependencies, we need to build them. But, for example, a pretty > commonly needed thing like autotools [3] has pretty crazy build > dependencies [4] including Java, gtk2, gtk3, erlang, X11, python2, > python3, etc. This is exactly why the separate Core and Extras

Re: Platform Python changes and python3dist tags

On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, I was just trying to build a new package in Rawhide that built fine a few days ago. The failure seems to be occurring because the python3 setuptools_scm module isn't being found. I'm using the new pythonXdist tags: BuildRequires: %{py2_dist

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to > build: > > autotrace-0.31.1-44.fc26.src.rpm > converseen-0.9.6.2-1.fc27.src.rpm > dmtx-utils-0.7.4-2.fc27.src.rpm >

[Bug 1484602] New: perl-Test-Trap-v0.3.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484602 Bug ID: 1484602 Summary: perl-Test-Trap-v0.3.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Trap Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Self Introduction: Charlie Sale

Hello Fedora Community! My name is Charlie Sale and I am an amateur C and C++ developer. I've been programming for about 4 years now and have produced a variety of projects. I am now releasing my first large-scale distributed project on the Fedora project. I have submitted my package review at

Fedora Rawhide-20170823.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 32/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170822.n.0): ID: 133549 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL:

Re: introducing fed-install: easy way to install packages from koji and other releases

On 08/23/2017 01:17 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi > wrote: > > > First, one thing that would be very handy (but could perhaps just be a > dnf plugin) is to install from koji, but use signed

Self Introduction: Richard Kellner

Hello everyone, my name is Richard Kellner and I am a Python developer. In my free time, I am also a PyCon SK volunteer. Recently I have got this crazy idea to submit some of my packages to Fedora, so here I am. I have just submitted my first package for review:

Re: [modularity] Modules and AppStream

On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 17:25 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 23 August 2017 at 13:57, Marius Vollmer wrote: > > In a modular repository, I think the same thing should happen so that > > GNOME Software can present interesting modules to the user in a nice > > way. > >

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-Install (master). "Upgrade to Fedora Rawhide"

From 3aacaa49758092830f30e5b27c0917e30357b5bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 23 2017 15:37:07 + Subject: Upgrade to Fedora Rawhide --- diff --git a/perl-Module-Install.yaml b/perl-Module-Install.yaml index de87cff..29c381b 100644 ---

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MailTools (f27). "Update to 2.19, drop EL-5 support (..more)"

From 80b56f0826fa49a1094ce1d1eea8aae408275bfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 23 2017 15:16:11 + Subject: Update to 2.19, drop EL-5 support - New upstream release 2.19 - Block namespace MailTools (CPAN RT#120905) - Add "ancient" to %summary and

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MailTools (master). "Update to 2.19, drop EL-5 support (..more)"

From 80b56f0826fa49a1094ce1d1eea8aae408275bfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 23 2017 15:16:11 + Subject: Update to 2.19, drop EL-5 support - New upstream release 2.19 - Block namespace MailTools (CPAN RT#120905) - Add "ancient" to %summary and

pghmcfc uploaded MailTools-2.19.tar.gz for perl-MailTools

a4ecba2acba56f2d41294e1b299c08b138d5e4796880635afcea7628adf60e11d5b138fc56001c331f765048bd91fa94da27bd7fdeedc51ff91e4ef5770a068e MailTools-2.19.tar.gz

jplesnik pushed to perl-Config-Model-Tester (f27). "3.002 bump"

From 8a9e1cffd086f99a49cd5015cd240749af4515d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 23 2017 07:03:40 + Subject: 3.002 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 64b50b8..bf1e8e4 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@

jplesnik pushed to perl-Config-Model-Tester (master). "3.002 bump"

From 8a9e1cffd086f99a49cd5015cd240749af4515d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 23 2017 07:03:40 + Subject: 3.002 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 64b50b8..bf1e8e4 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@

jplesnik uploaded Config-Model-Tester-3.002.tar.gz for perl-Config-Model-Tester

93ad17c795bff38bf55ac19c79d2e8eab49e64f6e6e71354f01cdf666fb3b4b4ea33bdca522116163ce1f4e9cd81c85f22ef1a6953fa33a6f46a134accf629e4 Config-Model-Tester-3.002.tar.gz

[Bug 1482536] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9746 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482536 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Review swap

Hi Volerk, Hello Andrea! > > Please add it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS > Added!! Bye, Andrea ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

Am 2017-08-23 um 12:16 schrieb Andrea Musuruane: Hi! I'm looking for a reviewer for osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777 Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested? I'm happy to exchange reviews. Thanks in advance. Bye,

Re: autoconf-archive suddenly gone in EPEL 7

> On 23. Aug 2017, at 14:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > This is one of those unfortunate things that happens when using CentOS; major > releases trail RHEL and sometimes when things make the shift from EPEL to > RHEL proper, CentOS users end up without some packages

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:02 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > The problem is that CentOS 7.4 still doesn't exist yet, so if Node.js > > requires OpenSSL 1.0.2 functionality, it's still broken for CentOS users. > > Yep, but then also is a bunch of other stuff due to the fact

Re: [modularity] Modules and AppStream

On 23 August 2017 at 13:57, Marius Vollmer wrote: > In a modular repository, I think the same thing should happen so that > GNOME Software can present interesting modules to the user in a nice > way. What kind of modules would be shown in gnome-software? Are

Re: modularity: (my) expectations vs. reality

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:51:57 +0200 Michal Novotny wrote: > I guess I am missing something but I don't see how modularity adds > flexibility. rpm, yum repos, ansible, dnf seem to be quite flexible > even now and having that + something else on top seems to be less > flexible. I

Re: removable setup rpm?!

Dne 18.8.2017 v 13:43 Petr Stodulka napsal(a): which leads to unusable system, because of missing important files, like /etc/shadow, Lets just focus on this one package. The question is why the removal of the package is removing /etc/shadow /etc/passwd ? When I remove it it will:

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:02 AM Peter Robinson > wrote: >> >> > It turns out there's an additional issue; it appears that Node.js 6.11.2 >> > with the bundled http-parser doesn't work

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 August 2017 at 10:01, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM Richard Grainger wrote: > >>> I'm trying to figure out what to do here. We can't just

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:02 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > It turns out there's an additional issue; it appears that Node.js 6.11.2 > > with the bundled http-parser doesn't work properly with OpenSSL 1.0.1 on > > EPEL 7. This would also be fixed by requiring RHEL/CentOS 7.4

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

On 23 August 2017 at 10:01, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM Richard Grainger wrote: >> I'm trying to figure out what to do here. We can't just put back the >> http-parser in EPEL unfortunately because the RHEL folks

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL-7.4 is released (build roots updating)

Is there a list of the packages that will be removed from EPEL because they are in RHEL 7.4? (And when that will happen?) Many of our users are on Scientific Linux and SL 7.4 is not out yet. Thanks, -Mat On 08/01/17 16:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: RHEL-7.4 was released today and so the

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Currently grub2 isn't being built for i686 since somewhere between 2.02-8 > and 2.02-10. > I looked through the change log (but not the git log yet) and didn't see > anything mentioning this, which I would have expected if it was

alglib soname bump

Hi I'm updating to alglib-3.12.0 in rawhide and F27, I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: gmsh-3.0.4-1.fc27.src.rpm qmapshack-1.9.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 22.8.2017 v 14:53 Michal Novotny napsal(a): >> >> Eventually, a new version should pop up here: >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mock >> >> You can give it Karma when it appears so that it reaches

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM Richard Grainger wrote: >> >> OK, thanks, >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote: >>> >>> Anssi Johansson kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 13.31: Richard Grainger kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 11.55: >

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:42:29AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > It's both: http://suse.github.io/kiwi/development/kiwi_from_python.html > It's explicitly designed to be used as a Python module as well as a > command line tool. Ok then. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:40:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> So I submitted a review request on Sunday for python-kiwi[1], which is >> the KIWI appliance image builder tool from SUSE[2] and is registered >> in

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM Richard Grainger wrote: > OK, thanks, > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote: > >> Anssi Johansson kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 13.31: >> >>> Richard Grainger kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 11.55: >>> yum install

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:40:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > So I submitted a review request on Sunday for python-kiwi[1], which is > the KIWI appliance image builder tool from SUSE[2] and is registered > in PyPI as kiwi[3]. Shouldn't this new package just be named "kiwi"? From the docs, it's a

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Haïkel wrote: > 2017-08-23 14:44 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : >> Dne 23.8.2017 v 11:40 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >>> >>> However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in >>> Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk

Re: [modularity] Modularizing the world fast and iteratively

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:54:25AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > So instead of trying to make everything perfect from the begining, we could > build everything we need against the Bootstrap module - a module that is > used as a buildroot for Host and Platform and contains mostly everything we >

Re: CI projects in Copr

Hi, We are making daily builds of Anaconda in Copr for Rawhide[1] and actual Fedora[2]. These daily builds are used for our other test suites. [1]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/rhinstaller/Anaconda/ [2]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/rhinstaller/Anaconda-dev el/ On

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:57:30 -0400, > Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> >> I think I read here (or in other mailing list) about an interest in >> dropping 32bit altogether. But this might be just my

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:57:30 -0400, Mauricio Tavares wrote: I think I read here (or in other mailing list) about an interest in dropping 32bit altogether. But this might be just my imagination. Certainly there was a discussion, but I hadn't heard this was definitive,

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

On 23/08/17 13:57, Vascom wrote: This commit remove add i686 to ExcludeArch https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2/c/ecef1ed7b50ed05b65574c8b8815d7ae66e5a0a9 ExcludeArch: s390 s390x %{arm} %{?ix86} Without of course the required comment pointing at the required bug which blocks the

[ANNOUNCE] D-Bus Broker Project

This is the first public release of dbus-broker. Git Tag: v3 Archive: https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/archive/v3/dbus-broker-v3.tar.gz The dbus-broker project is an implementation of a message bus as defined by the D-Bus specification. Its aim is to provide high performance and

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 14:44 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : > Dne 23.8.2017 v 11:40 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >> >> However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in >> Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk framework[5]. >> >> I'm not sure what to do in this scenario. I've requested

[modularity] Modules and AppStream

Hi, what happens when the packages in a module contain AppStream metainfo files? In a non-modular repository, all these metainfo files get collected into a big AppStream collection file which is then used by GNOME Software (for example) to present interesting packages to the user in a nice way.

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

I think I read here (or in other mailing list) about an interest in dropping 32bit altogether. But this might be just my imagination. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Currently grub2 isn't being built for i686 since somewhere between 2.02-8 > and 2.02-10.

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

This commit remove add i686 to ExcludeArch https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2/c/ecef1ed7b50ed05b65574c8b8815d7ae66e5a0a9 ExcludeArch: s390 s390x %{arm} %{?ix86} ср, 23 авг. 2017 г. в 15:35, Bruno Wolff III : > Currently grub2 isn't being built for i686 since somewhere

[Bug 1484400] New: perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484400 Bug ID: 1484400 Summary: perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.28 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Shell-Config-Generate Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Removal of code signing trust bits from ca-certificates

There hasn't been any negative feedback, neither in Rawhide, nor from updates testing. I've just pushed the update to stable F25 and F26. Kai On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 22:11 +0200, Kai Engert wrote: > Until recently, Mozilla maintained three individual trust bits for each root > CA > certificate:

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

Dne 23.8.2017 v 11:40 Neal Gompa napsal(a): However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk framework[5]. I'm not sure what to do in this scenario. I've requested from upstream to rename the module[6], but I don't think they'll go for that,

No i686 build of grub2?

Currently grub2 isn't being built for i686 since somewhere between 2.02-8 and 2.02-10. I looked through the change log (but not the git log yet) and didn't see anything mentioning this, which I would have expected if it was an intentional change. So is this a new permanent feature going

Re: autoconf-archive suddenly gone in EPEL 7

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM Benjamin Kircher wrote: > > > On 22. Aug 2017, at 12:53, Vascom wrote: > > > > As you can see here > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/autoconf-archive/commits/epel7 > > autoconf-archive removed from EPEL7 because

Re: CI projects in Copr

Hi, As the maintainer of the Pantheon DE components and elementary apps, I have a setup that runs "nightly" builds of 59 of those packages in the "decathorpe/elementary-nightly" COPR repository for all supported fedora releases. This "CI-like" setup helps me catch upstream changes (that warrant

Re: CI projects in Copr

Hi, I'm using Copr for build on commit for dnssec-trigger project: https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnssec-trigger-fedora It's using tito. But I'm looking for a different way of doing this. Especially when I work on some upstream project and I don't want to force them to include tito.

Re: f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

Dne 22.8.2017 v 14:53 Michal Novotny napsal(a): Eventually, a new version should pop up here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mock You can give it Karma when it appears so that it reaches Fedora repos a bit faster. It is there waiting for your karma. Mirek

Re: Deprecating rpmgrill-fetch-build and rpmgrill-analyze-local

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Róman Joost wrote: > Hi, > > The rpmgrill tool ships with two commands which I think can be > deprecated: > > rpmgrill-fetch-build in favour of `koji download-task` > rpmgrill-analyze-local in favour of rpmgrill-unpack; rpmgrill

Re: Review swap

Hi, On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Andrea, > > I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment, > they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour. > > I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I

Re: retired packages in rawhide/f27

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 08/22/2017 02:30 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI wrote: > >> hi, > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41 > >> libibcm, libibumad, libibverbs, librdmacm and ibacm had

CI projects in Copr

Hi, I am gathering informations about various use of CI with Copr. Do you use Copr for building packages for nightlies? For building packages before pull request is merged? Do you have your set up described somewhere? What is the name of your project? Please let me know. Either here or via

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 47840-Add docstrings to setup and use generate_ds_params

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/47840 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/eaa6e56273ea3713584e252043017927240179e518d23f86000d79378e32-0001-Issue-47840-Add-docstrings-to-setup.patch Thanks, Amita ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

OK, thanks, On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Anssi Johansson wrote: > Anssi Johansson kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 13.31: > >> Richard Grainger kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 11.55: >> >>> yum install nodejs >>> >> >> Try with this: >> >> yum install nodejs --enablerepo=epel-testing >> >>

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

Anssi Johansson kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 13.31: Richard Grainger kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 11.55: yum install nodejs Try with this: yum install nodejs --enablerepo=epel-testing This will install nodejs with http-parser bundled in. http-parser was removed from EPEL because it is now in RHEL

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

Richard Grainger kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 11.55: yum install nodejs Try with this: yum install nodejs --enablerepo=epel-testing This will install nodejs with http-parser bundled in. http-parser was removed from EPEL because it is now in RHEL 7.4, and EPEL does not ship packages that are

Re: Review swap

Hello Andrea, I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment, they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour. I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I think I might have one by next week. ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1477136] perl-No-Worries-1.5 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-No-Worries-1.5-1.fc26

[Bug 1477136] perl-No-Worries-1.5 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-No-Worries-1.5-1.fc26

Review swap

Hi! I'm looking for a reviewer for osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777 Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested? I'm happy to exchange reviews. Thanks in advance. Bye, Andrea

Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

Hey all, So I submitted a review request on Sunday for python-kiwi[1], which is the KIWI appliance image builder tool from SUSE[2] and is registered in PyPI as kiwi[3]. However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk framework[5]. I'm not sure

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

On 08/23/2017 02:00 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Also, I'd like to very much thank you for doing this work. :) > It's great to get done, it's great to do it quickly and I know it's a > lot of hard work to script and build things. Yes, thank you for doing this, Zbyszek! -- Kalev

[Bug 1483773] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483773 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] nodejs broken

Hi Dependencies for nodejs seem to be broken currently on CentOS 7. Are EPEL builds for 7.4 still ongoing?: [root@b4982b06b5fd /]# yum install nodejs Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, ovl Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.as29550.net * epel: mirrors.coreix.net * extras:

[Bug 1483773] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483773 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: src.fedoraproject.org, forking projects, PRs

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:44:56AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:34:22 - > "Wolfgang Stoeggl" wrote: > > > Hello, > > is forking projects, PRs etc. already supposed to work at > > src.fedoraproject.org? So far, I am getting the following: > > > > # Source

Re: introducing fed-install: easy way to install packages from koji and other releases

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > First, one thing that would be very handy (but could perhaps just be a > dnf plugin) is to install from koji, but use signed packages (if > available). I'm not sure how hard it would be to implement in your tool, > but you

[modularity] Modularizing the world fast and iteratively

Starting with a summary: ​Let's 1) use something like dependency-report scripts [1] to get coordinated, and 2) make the initial builds against bootstrap so we get a working thing fast and can iterate. I've realized that developing the initial set of modules for F27 could be a bit tricky in the

Re: src.fedoraproject.org, forking projects, PRs

Thanks for the hint! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: src.fedoraproject.org, forking projects, PRs

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:34:22 - "Wolfgang Stoeggl" wrote: > Hello, > is forking projects, PRs etc. already supposed to work at > src.fedoraproject.org? So far, I am getting the following: > > # Source GIT URL: SSH > git clone

src.fedoraproject.org, forking projects, PRs

Hello, is forking projects, PRs etc. already supposed to work at src.fedoraproject.org? So far, I am getting the following: # Source GIT URL: SSH git clone ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/forks/c72578/rpms/cacti.git Permission denied (publickey). # Remark: the ~/.ssh/id_rsa key is present here and

[Bug 1484170] perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484170 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 776 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 770 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 660

[Bug 1479680] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479680 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.006-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fusioninventory-agent-2.3.2