On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On 10/14/2017 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Since branched releases have the updates-testing repository enabled by
>>> default, won't the effect you desire happen anyway?
>> No, because the updates-testing repo is enabled by default for
Hello,
Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in
bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and FESCo tickets, there is a
number of users who
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 04:23 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 13.10.2017 um 18:58 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 09:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Adam not replying just to you but the general thread.
> > What is the point of bringing up all these plugins breakage ? If
> > Mo
On 10/13/2017 07:11 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Which all means our release planning is too focused on Gnome and not enough
thought is put into the roadmap of major non-Gnome desktop apps such as Firefox
or Libreoffice. I'd argue that this kind of Firefox change is way more
impacti
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
> getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:35:56 +0200, you wrote:
>IMHO, it would be reasonable and common sense to either postpone F27
>until FF57 has become stable or to revert the firefox change.
Except FF57 is stable (at least no one so far is complaining about it
being otherwise).
For those who use its plugi
Hi all,
if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the
update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch?
background:
I updated librealsense to librealsense2 and afterwards realized that the
new library is a major rewrite that does not support older camera
models. After consultin
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Gerald Henriksen
wrote:
> Except FF57 is stable (at least no one so far is complaining about it
> being otherwise).
>
> For those who use its plugins then there may be an issue (depending on
> how many do a last minute update vs. can't/won't be udated) but that
>
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Till Hofmann
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the
> update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch?
>
> background:
> I updated librealsense to librealsense2 and afterwards realized that the
> new library is a maj
For those of you who were concerned about LastPass:
https://www.engadget.com/2017/10/13/lastpass-beta-firefox-57-webextension/
The beta version is available now - The final version will be ready when
the browser arrives on November 14th.
As I mentioned earlier, for those who want to use a GPLv3
I filed an issue to request this change:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/1895
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
On 10/15/2017 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I would suggest that you submit librealsense1 as a separate package,
> instead. The applications that use the older versions should probably
> be linked to the older one, but things should progressively migrate to
> the newer one.
This sounds like a reas
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 85/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171014.n.0):
ID: 157939 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 25/137 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171014.n.0):
ID: 158211 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/158211
ID: 158216
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped
Hi,
I stumbled upon EDB [1] the other day and it looks fairly close to what
I've been looking for for a while now. It seems the Fedora package is
about 5 years out of date so I submitted a PR [2] for it. There's also a
COPR build of that branch [3] in case anyone wants to try it. Finally,
there's
--
Enviado desde mi móvil, disculpe la brevedad
William
El 15/10/2017 10:36 a. m., "Neal Gompa" escribió:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Till Hofmann
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the
> update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch?
>
>
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:52 PM, William Moreno
wrote:
>
>
> El 15/10/2017 10:36 a. m., "Neal Gompa" escribió:
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Till Hofmann
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the
>> update to rawhide), do I need to add
> Hello,
>
> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
> getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in
> bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and FESCo tickets, there is a
> number
20 matches
Mail list logo
