OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 23:58 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 00:32 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils.
> > - fileutils
> > - sh-utils
> > - stat
> > - textutils
> > - mkt
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 00:32 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils.
> - fileutils
> - sh-utils
> - stat
> - textutils
> - mktemp
Script of startup of Azureus use mktemp
cat /usr/bin/azureus | grep mktemp
TMP_SCRIPT=$(mktemp)
mktem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils.
- - fileutils
- - sh-utils
- - stat
- - textutils
- - mktemp
First four never been separate packages (at least from what I can see
in dist-git), last one disappeared in fc10...
I've
Looks like success to me ...
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22980259
Is there something I'm missing?
Rich.
- Forwarded message from notificati...@fedoraproject.org -
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:05:58 + (UTC)
From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org
To: rjo...@redh
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped pac
On 11/07/2017 05:51 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
pam_mo
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> >
> >clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
> >libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
> >libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >pam_mount-0:2.15-3.fc24.x86_64
> >system
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> > On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> > >
> > >clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
> > >libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
> > >libluksmeta-0:
It's actually cryptsetup:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=996024
A completely new version (2.0.0) was just added to Rawhide ...
This has an SONAME bump (.4 -> .12).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programm
There are a bunch of problems which have just appeared
(literally in the last hour) in Rawhide:
DEBUG util.py:439: Error:
DEBUG util.py:439: Problem 1: package webkitgtk4-2.19.1-2.fc28.x86_64
requires libupower-glib.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
DEBUG util.py:439
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> >
> >clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
> >libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
> >libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
> >pam_mount-0:2.15-3.fc24.x86_64
> >system
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Another method might be to add an alternate strip binary/script which
> filters based on your preferred criteria.
>
> %global __strip %{_sourcedir}/my-strip.sh
Just marking the relevant files non-executable works in my case, but thanks
for the suggestion.
David
__
On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64
libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64
libluksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
luksmeta-0:8-1.fc28.x86_64
pam_mount-0:2.15-3.fc24.x86_64
systemd-0:235-2.fc28.x86_64
systemd-tests-0:235-2.fc28.x86_64
systemd-udev-0:235-2.fc28.x8
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:23:33AM +, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Is it possible to specify from a specfile an list of files and/or directories
> in the installation output that should be ignored for the purposes of
> debuginfo extraction? If not, can this be added?
>
> I maintain cr
On 11/07/2017 03:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> During a package review rpmlint noted that the package did not own
> /usr/share/metainfo.
>
> A cursory "rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/metainfo" returned no results.
>
> I know rpm can handle multiple packages owning a directory these days
> but I
During a package review rpmlint noted that the package did not own
/usr/share/metainfo.
A cursory "rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/metainfo" returned no results.
I know rpm can handle multiple packages owning a directory these days but I
don't think it is correct for a package only providing an
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.
On mardi 7 novembre 2017 13:11:36 CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> > │├── 1508060 Review Request: golang-github-kylelemons-godebug -
> > Debugging helper utilities for Go
││
> > https:/
Hi David,
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 11:23 +, David Howells wrote:
> Is it possible to specify from a specfile an list of files and/or
> directories
> in the installation output that should be ignored for the purposes of
> debuginfo extraction? If not, can this be added?
Debuginfo extraction is o
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> │├── 1508060 Review Request: golang-github-kylelemons-godebug -
> Debugging helper utilities for Go
> ││ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508060
> ││
> │└── 1508071
Hi Mark,
Is it possible to specify from a specfile an list of files and/or directories
in the installation output that should be ignored for the purposes of
debuginfo extraction? If not, can this be added?
I maintain cross-gcc and there are some files that get
installed that must not be stripped
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 8/135 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27 RC 1.3):
ID: 165598 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165598
ID: 166894 Test
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:31 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 06:40 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> > Hi, I started playing with the pass[1] unix password manager and finally
> > found workflow that makes my Kerberos workflow scriptable :)
>
> Or you can simply create a keytab (using ktutil)
On 2017-11-07 02:24, David Tardon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote:
>>> poppler-sharp
>>
>> Are you sure this is necessary? Only libpoppler-glib is mentioned in
>> the .dll.config, and libpoppler doesn't have a C
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote:
> > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
> > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>
> While ultimately it would be nice to have
On 11/02/2017 06:40 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> Hi, I started playing with the pass[1] unix password manager and finally
> found workflow that makes my Kerberos workflow scriptable :)
Or you can simply create a keytab (using ktutil) and run "kinit -k"
without typing password.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
antlr license was changed from "Public Domain" to "ANTLR-PD"
For justification, see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7JUCBVMP5VG5NEPX4NPQBIHBHH2WORE2/
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
__
28 matches
Mail list logo
