[Bug 1513449] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513449 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.08-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1512523] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512523 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.12-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1513439] perl-Filter-1.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513439 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Filter-1.58-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1513448] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513448 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.12-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1512284] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512284 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.08-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171115.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:

[Bug 1514629] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514629 Bug ID: 1514629 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.55 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

2017-11-20 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

# Fedora QA Devel Meeting # Date: 2017-11-20 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Qadevel-20171120 If you have any additional topics, please reply to this thread or add them

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:50:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > (I don't understand why we package Firefox addons at all, it seems like > a silly idea. But oh well.) It is useful to get the same addons in all profiles/users on a system and avoids the necessity to update them everywhere

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 05:01:32PM -0500, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > > Alternatively, rather than block the updates, at least leave the last > > working version in the repository so that users can downgrade to > >

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > > Again, why allow addons to be packaged at all if we are not prepared to > block browser updates that break addons? > I don't believe we should be in the business of determining which applications are worthy of

Re: [Forged Sender] Re: No vtkGUISupportQtOpenGL in fedora?

On 11/03/2017 03:45 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi, Mario. > > On Thursday, 02 November 2017 at 18:21, Mario Ceresa wrote: >> I was wondering if anyone knows why vtkGUISupportQtOpenGL is not included >> in packaged vtk. Other classes with opengl(2) are available. > > It would be

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 05:01:32PM -0500, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > Alternatively, rather than block the updates, at least leave the last > working version in the repository so that users can downgrade to > something more recent. Right now it looks like F26 users can either > accept Firefox 57 and

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 11:11 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > If someone wants to package an addon, no problem - but they should > keep it > up-to-date. > > One issue that I think is problematic is test cases for addons within > bodhi > for firefox itself. > You should not hold the release of the

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > And there is no warning if you click in firefox-57.0-2.fc27.x86_64 on any > add-on that it is installing a non-Fedora-signed add-on. > > (Then there is also "Update Add-ons Automatically" turned on by default

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:53:43 +0100, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 11/16/2017 11:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > (I don't understand why we package Firefox addons at all, it seems like > > a silly idea. But oh well.) > > I personally like the idea of packaging addons, for the same reasons I > like

Re: flit

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 17 November 2017 at 11:55, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> > So the two possible approaches are: >> > >> > * traditional

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On 11/17/2017 02:11 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > You are correct that not all the addons have free licenses... Lastpass > quickly comes to mind. > Regarding known sources, mozilla does vet all the addons - so if you are > getting > them from mozilla.org they are from a known

[Bug 1427019] The new value for smtpserver is invalid: Cannot connect to

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427019 Hugh changed: What|Removed |Added Version|25 |26 -- You are

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-17)

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 11/17/2017 01:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> I really miss the meeting minutes that dumped the .txt version of the >> summary in the body of the email itself. That used to be SOP for >> FESCo meetings, and it

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 11/16/2017 11:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > (I don't understand why we package Firefox addons at all, it seems like > > a silly idea. But oh well.) > > I personally like the idea of packaging addons,

Fedora Rawhide-20171117.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 25/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171114.n.0): ID: 171169 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL:

[Bug 1513439] perl-Filter-1.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513439 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Filter-1.58-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1513448] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513448 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1512523] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512523 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1513449] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513449 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.08-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1512284] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512284 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.08-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1513793] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On 11/16/2017 11:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > (I don't understand why we package Firefox addons at all, it seems like > a silly idea. But oh well.) I personally like the idea of packaging addons, for the same reasons I like getting Firefox from Fedora rather than directly from Mozilla. Some

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-17)

On 11/17/2017 01:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > I really miss the meeting minutes that dumped the .txt version of the > summary in the body of the email itself. That used to be SOP for > FESCo meetings, and it facilitated actual discussion on specific > topics. Can we go back to that? Sure! Took me

Re: Proposal to increase the beta freeze to 3 weeks

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings fellow Fedorans! > > During today's FESCo meeting[0], there was discussion around a proposal > to increase the freeze period from 2 weeks to 3 weeks[1]. Several > members of FESCo thought this proposal

Proposal to increase the beta freeze to 3 weeks

Greetings fellow Fedorans! During today's FESCo meeting[0], there was discussion around a proposal to increase the freeze period from 2 weeks to 3 weeks[1]. Several members of FESCo thought this proposal might be unpopular with Fedora developers, so a compromise proposal was made: increase the

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-17)

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > You can view the minutes from today's FESCo meeting at meetbot: > > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-11-17/fesco.2017-11-17-16.03.html > >

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes

___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-17)

You can view the minutes from today's FESCo meeting at meetbot: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-11-17/fesco.2017-11-17-16.03.html https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-11-17/fesco.2017-11-17-16.03.log.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > OK, but why are we packaging these addons at all if that is the answer? > The situation right now is that we have packages that are broken by an > update and a confusing situation for users who try to install

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171117.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171117.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On 11/17/2017 1628Z, Kevin Fenzi wrote: The bottleneck is the part where it's finished all the builds and needs to check the noarch packages built on each arch to make sure they are the same. Patrick now has some ideas for a real fix in koji, so hopefully we will be past this issue soon.

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On 11/17/2017 03:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:03:58AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 11/16/2017 03:58 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> We're now 48 hours into the build and it hasn't completed, probably >>> indicating that something is going on. >>> >>> And

Re: Is it a bug in DNF or a fault by maintainer?

Christopher Meng wrote on 11/17/2017 10:59 PM: Hi all, As mostly described in the bug[1], I encountered upgrade path issue from 26 to rawhide, which has been here for a long time preventing a complete update without manual exclusion. DNF in my computer says: # dnf update catfish* 1>/dev/null

Re: Is it a bug in DNF or a fault by maintainer?

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 09:59:17PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > As mostly described in the bug[1], I encountered upgrade path issue > from 26 to rawhide, which has been here for a long time preventing a > complete update without manual exclusion. > DNF in my computer says: > # dnf update

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171115.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:

Is it a bug in DNF or a fault by maintainer?

Hi all, As mostly described in the bug[1], I encountered upgrade path issue from 26 to rawhide, which has been here for a long time preventing a complete update without manual exclusion. DNF in my computer says: # dnf update catfish* 1>/dev/null Problem: cannot install both

Re: Call for testing - Firefox 57

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 21:55 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Adam Williamson ect.org > > wrote: > > > > (I don't understand why we package Firefox addons at all, it seems > > like > > a silly idea. But oh well.) > > > > > > +1 - Yeah,

[Bug 1514432] New: perl-CGI-Fast-2.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514432 Bug ID: 1514432 Summary: perl-CGI-Fast-2.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CGI-Fast Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: firefox with

this is awesome, this should be default. does it look cool in KDE/xfce ..etc ? On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Christian Stadelmann < genodeft...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > After setting "widget.allow-client-side-decoration" to true and > restarting firefox, I can see those CSDs even with

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:03:58AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/16/2017 03:58 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > We're now 48 hours into the build and it hasn't completed, probably > > indicating that something is going on. > > > > And -- although this is *not* in any way the fault of

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

2017-11-16 16:49 GMT-05:00 Tom Callaway : > On 11/16/2017 11:03 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I'm not sure what more we can do... > > While not solving this immediate problem, I am working on redoing the > texlive package to make it less evil, in my spare cycles. Maybe now

List name (was: Re: Moving away from Thrift)

Christopher wrote: > Crap, sorry, this was sent to the wrong list. Sorry. Why does every > community have mailing list called "dev" or "devel"? So confusing. Sorry > again. This list actually used to be called fedora-devel-list, but when it moved to @lists.fedoraproject.org, somebody figured

[389-devel] Please Review: Issue 49455 - Add tests to monitor test suit

Hello, Please review my patch for - Add tests to monitor test suit https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49455 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/848db9c6c4e65b15c5a0833aa327cb88b5729afabedfac346cfd0587a7c9c864-0001-Ticket-49455-Add-tests-to-monitor-test-suit.patch Thanks & Regards,