License change in git-annex

git-annex-6.20180316 has changed license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+. Technically, this was true when I enabled the webapp option in Rawhide earlier, but I did not realize it. However, AGPL code has been merged into the main application so the entirety of the package is now AGPL regardless of that bu

[Bug 1564306] New: perl-App-Cme-1.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564306 Bug ID: 1564306 Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.027 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-Cme Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:53:03PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:06 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 18:28 Matthew Miller, wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:03:24PM +, James Hogarth wrote: > >> > > I'm imagining all those dependent

Re: libqalculate soname change

I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.3.0 instead of 2.2.1 as per my previous email). This involves a soname change. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will build qalculate and the affected packages in rawhide and Fe

Re: Fedora Notifications app is incomprehensible

On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 14:09 +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > On 04/03/2018 07:49 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora > > Notifications? > > It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party > > Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to he

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-04-06)

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:15:31PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time,

You can now run Fedora 27 on 64 bit RISC-V machines (or qemu)

I'm sure not many people have RISC-V machines cluttering their homes and offices, but in case you can now run Fedora 27 on 64 bit RISC-V (RV64GC). We have: - A choice of GCC 7.3.1 or GCC 8 - Perl, Python, Ruby, Erlang, OCaml, Lua, Tcl/Tk, ... - vi, emacs, git, rpm-build, etc. - PostgreSQL and

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:06 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 18:28 Matthew Miller, wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:03:24PM +, James Hogarth wrote: >> > > I'm imagining all those dependent packages _also_ moving to that >> > > module >> > Sorry Matthew but I can't

Fedora 28-20180405.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 217741 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/217741 ID: 217742 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21774

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 18:28 Matthew Miller, wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:03:24PM +, James Hogarth wrote: > > > I'm imagining all those dependent packages _also_ moving to that > > > module > > Sorry Matthew but I can't see that actually happening at all... > > > > If they are already

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180405.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180404.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180405.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 42 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:03:24PM +, James Hogarth wrote: > > I'm imagining all those dependent packages _also_ moving to that > > module > Sorry Matthew but I can't see that actually happening at all... > > If they are already leaping to drop python2-* way ahead of the proposed EOL > of

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180405.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 16:05 Matthew Miller, wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:11:47PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > But it's not python2 itself going that is really the painful part of > > this ... it's the various python2-* packages going bye-bye as > > maintainers (are already) dropping them.

Re: Friendly Reminder: Your Legal Responsibilities as a Fedora Community Member

On 04/02/2018 06:39 PM, Christopher wrote: > On 04/02/2018 11:15 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: >> Most of you are very good about this, and I appreciate it. However, >> lately, at least one package cleared review and landed in Fedora which >> was obviously infringing upon both copyrights and trademarks

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-04-06)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018

Re: release-monitoring is telling me it has noticed (new) ceph-13.0.x

Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > according to https://release-monitoring.org/project/267/ > > But the Homepage: in the above and the Source: in the .spec would seem > to be saying that http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ is where > the-new-hotness is looking. If you pull up the 'Edit' page you can check

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:11:47PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > But it's not python2 itself going that is really the painful part of > this ... it's the various python2-* packages going bye-bye as > maintainers (are already) dropping them... even when they still work. > > Having a module of pytho

Re: release-monitoring is telling me it has noticed (new) ceph-13.0.x

On 05/04/18 15:50, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: according to https://release-monitoring.org/project/267/ But the Homepage: in the above and the Source: in the .spec would seem to be saying that http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ is where the-new-hotness is looking. And there is no ceph-13.x.y tar

Re: release-monitoring is telling me it has noticed (new) ceph-13.0.x

On 04/05/2018 10:50 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > according to https://release-monitoring.org/project/267/ > > But the Homepage: in the above and the Source: in the .spec would seem > to be saying that http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ is where > the-new-hotness is looking. > > And there is

release-monitoring is telling me it has noticed (new) ceph-13.0.x

according to https://release-monitoring.org/project/267/ But the Homepage: in the above and the Source: in the .spec would seem to be saying that http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ is where the-new-hotness is looking. And there is no ceph-13.x.y tar at that location (yet). It's a maze of twisty

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 5 April 2018 at 13:23, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:58:57AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> And if you read the original mail to the end, you'll find that our >> position is not as black-and-white as it might look from the Subject >> line. >> As Python SIG we maintain old P

Re: Fedora Notifications app is incomprehensible

On 04/03/2018 07:49 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications? > It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party > Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand how > to use it. The UI is pretty difficult

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 04/05/2018 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/29/2018 10:59 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> I believe it's our cmocka tests that occur at rpm package time that >> brought this to our attention.  So it is easy to reproduce. > > Well, I tried, but the package no longer builds on rawhide, even o

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:58:57AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote: > And if you read the original mail to the end, you'll find that our > position is not as black-and-white as it might look from the Subject > line. > As Python SIG we maintain old Python versions like 2.6 or 3.3 > *today* – but just for

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686

On 03/29/2018 10:59 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I believe it's our cmocka tests that occur at rpm package time that brought this to our attention.  So it is easy to reproduce. Well, I tried, but the package no longer builds on rawhide, even on x86_64: libtool: error: cannot find the library 'li

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

Le mercredi 04 avril 2018 à 17:23 +0200, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > Akira TAGOH wrote: > > And I also don't think we really > need > all 3 of Sans, Serif and Mono. Technically, those are three separate font families that happen to be more or less coordinated, and culling along font family lines is

Re: Package Anki has a Non-responsive Maintainer, Christian Krause

I have openned a FESCo issue (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1874) offering to take over this package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Il 04/04/2018 22:49, James Hogarth ha scritto: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 20:26 Adam Williamson, > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 11:15 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 4 April 2018 at 11:01, David Sommerseth > wrote: > >