On 6 April 2018 at 22:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs.
BTW autofs: is it any particular reason why in Fedora kernels autofs
support is compiled into the kernel and is not provided as loadable
module?
$ cat /proc/filesystems | grep auto;
Hello guys,
with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs.
I had the following error “Too many levels of symbolic links”
I had to change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable ...
But I also discovered that by default mount.nfs and autofs are using NFSv4 and
cannot switch to NF
On 04/05/2018 03:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm sure not many people have RISC-V machines cluttering their homes
> and offices, but in case you can now run Fedora 27 on 64 bit RISC-V (RV64GC).
>
> We have:
>
> - A choice of GCC 7.3.1 or GCC 8
> - Perl, Python, Ruby, Erlang, OCaml, Lua,
Hi there,
I orphaned some packages because I don't use them (any more):
tempus-fugit
Java micro-library for time sensitive testing and concurrency.
log4shib
C++ logging library for Shibboleth (OpenSAML)
I've checked with dnf repoquery --whatrequires and none of them have (active)
parent depend
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:07 PM Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 02:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On F28
> > `dnf install php:8/server` (Assuming there's a profile called "server"
> > with the packages one would need to use PHP in a server context)
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-04-06)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-04-06/fesco
On 04/04/2018 02:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On F28
`dnf install php:8/server` (Assuming there's a profile called "server"
with the packages one would need to use PHP in a server context)
On F29, if you have the php:7 module enabled in F28, an upgrade will
not switch this on you. If it's
> "CS" == Charalampos Stratakis writes:
CS> On a relevant note, python packaging guidelines are soon subject for
CS> a change in regards to that [0]
CS> [0] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/753
Please note that the ticket there started off as a strong discouragement
of python2 pa
Hello,
I'm still looking for help to review these packages.
Please, if you're a packager and you nave spare time, do a quick fedora-
review.
I have a new one requested on the Fedora Reddit:
Review Request: cdargs - The shell cd with bookmarks and browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
- Original Message -
> From: "James Hogarth"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 12:09:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Intent to orphan Python 2
>
> On 6 April 2018 at 10:18, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 04/04/18 18:21, James Hogarth wrote:
> > [...]
On 6 April 2018 at 10:18, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 04/04/18 18:21, James Hogarth wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Can we please get some consistency here?
>>
>> I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall but of course
>> ansible isn't switching to py3 for the controller (and therefore local)
>
On 6 April 2018 at 01:10, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:53:03PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:06 PM, James Hogarth
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 18:28 Matthew Miller, wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:03:24PM +, James
On 04/04/18 18:21, James Hogarth wrote:
[...]
Can we please get some consistency here?
I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall but of course
ansible isn't switching to py3 for the controller (and therefore local)
until F29 and not all python modules are py3 compatible yet...
- Original Message -
> From: "Fabio Valentini"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 10:53:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Intent to orphan Python 2
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:06 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 18:28 Mat
14 matches
Mail list logo
