[Bug 1575164] New: perl-Carton-v1.0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575164 Bug ID: 1575164 Summary: perl-Carton-v1.0.33 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Carton Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Wednesday, 2018-05-02 15:23:10 +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote: > Does anyone see a reason not to prioritize ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin? Many have argued one way or another. Here is what I do, sourcing in a .zshrc (or whatever-shell-rc), which gives me selective control to override certain

Fedora Rawhide-20180504.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 42/137 (x86_64), 14/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 233888 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/233888 ID: 233895 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL:

Which sqlite?

Currently the package 'sqlite2' provides the binary /usr/bin/sqlite, while the package 'sqlite' provides the binary /usr/bin/sqlite3. This results in a confusing interaction, because with sqlite package installed, running sqlite results in a 'command not found' message and a suggestion to

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2018-05-04 12:25, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 05/04/2018 09:42 AM, John Florian wrote: On 2018-05-04 09:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I would do so for the following reasons: 1. Even though the security arguments are weak, they are going to be checkmarks on audits which can't be changed

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-05-04)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-05-04) === Meeting started by bowlofeggs at 15:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-05-04/fesco.2018-05-04-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 05/04/2018 09:42 AM, John Florian wrote: On 2018-05-04 09:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I would do so for the following reasons: 1. Even though the security arguments are weak, they are going to be checkmarks on audits which can't be changed for years. 2. When someone gets a "remove this

Re: ABI break in libidn-1.34

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 01:44:01PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > There was an unexpected change in the ABI of libidn-1.34, which broke > stringprep (bugs #1566414 #1573961). > > I've built libidn packages for F27 and F28 which revert the change > that broke the compatibility. In F28 there

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180504.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:13 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 131 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 14.20 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: GCC 8.1.1 broken in rawhide due to annobin

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 15:46 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:42:11PM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > It seems broken in f28 too. > > There is a temporary override so that new annobin can be built, it will be > reverted afterwards. > > These shenanigans are

Re: GCC 8.1.1 broken in rawhide due to annobin

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:42:11PM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > It seems broken in f28 too. There is a temporary override so that new annobin can be built, it will be reverted afterwards. Jakub ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2018-05-04 09:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I would do so for the following reasons: 1. Even though the security arguments are weak, they are going to be checkmarks on audits which can't be changed for years. 2. When someone gets a "remove this and find out why the OS did this" it helps if

Re: GCC 8.1.1 broken in rawhide due to annobin

It seems broken in f28 too. Ciao Guido ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 4 May 2018 at 05:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 4.5.2018 10:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> I don't think I like the idea of putting it early in the PATH by >> default, but I don't have a solid argument for why I don't like it. > > > Thanks. Honestly, that's the feeling I

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ebc610619f -- You are

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-45c57fee9b -- You are

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-76a8268331 -- You are

[Bug 1574983] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In

[rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure" (f26)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure on branch f26, which you are following: 776779abd6f552e1ea676d5d26f651143fea87cfPetr Písař0.011 bump a56cbeb5f8d90c9f7ec9a150100cc977b09a2062Petr Písařperl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

[rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure" (f27)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure on branch f27, which you are following: bd274ced02df3d030b82411e2ffa853cf6657873Petr Písař0.011 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure" (f28)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure on branch f28, which you are following: f8a148d6eb8826891e55f6378f89703107e63c1bPetr Písař0.011 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Session-Storage-Secure on branch master, which you are following: f8a148d6eb8826891e55f6378f89703107e63c1bPetr Písař0.011 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1574983] New: perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574983 Bug ID: 1574983 Summary: perl-Session-Storage-Secure-0.011 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Session-Storage-Secure Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1574885] Fedora 28 upgrade causes perl downgrade

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574885 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1574885] Fedora 28 upgrade causes perl downgrade

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574885 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added CC||al...@redhat.com,

ABI break in libidn-1.34

There was an unexpected change in the ABI of libidn-1.34, which broke stringprep (bugs #1566414 #1573961). I've built libidn packages for F27 and F28 which revert the change that broke the compatibility. In F28 there seems to be only one package (mcabber) which was built with libidn-1.34-1. It

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 04/05/18 09:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 03/05/18 12:23 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: By convention additions to the path come LAST in priority, because of well known privilege escalation attack approaches (the incautious admin sits down at a 'trapped' nominally sick workstation, and fails to

[Bug 1574910] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.111-8.fc29 FTBFS: Statgrab.so: undefined symbol: sg_get_disk_io_stats_r

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574910 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 125204 -- You

[Bug 1574910] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.111-8.fc29 FTBFS: Statgrab.so: undefined symbol: sg_get_disk_io_stats_r

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574910 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This is triggered by upgrading perl-Config-AutoConf from 0.315-2.fc28 to 0.316-1.fc29. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1574910] New: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.111-8.fc29 FTBFS: Statgrab.so: undefined symbol: sg_get_disk_io_stats_r

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574910 Bug ID: 1574910 Summary: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.111-8.fc29 FTBFS: Statgrab.so: undefined symbol: sg_get_disk_io_stats_r Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 4.5.2018 10:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: I don't think I like the idea of putting it early in the PATH by default, but I don't have a solid argument for why I don't like it. Thanks. Honestly, that's the feeling I get form this discussion. People don't like it, so they try to explain the

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 03/05/18 12:23 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: By convention additions to the path come LAST in priority, because of well known privilege escalation attack approaches (the incautious admin sits down at a 'trapped' nominally sick workstation, and fails to use a fully qualified path to 'su' or 'sudo'

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 4.5.2018 10:38, Petr Pisar wrote:> How does prioritized ~/.local match removing #!/usr/bin/env from Fedora packages? It smells pretty inconsistently. When running RPM installed tools we want them to run on RPM installed interpreters. When you run stuff from /usr/bin that was installed by

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2018-05-03, Tomas Orsava wrote: > On 05/02/2018 05:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:10:05AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: >>> >>> - Original Message - From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" To: "Development

Re: GCC 8.1.1 broken in rawhide due to annobin

On 03/05/18 22:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: I think we also need some automated test that validates "can create executables with standard RPM build flags" that is a blocking test before gcc RPMs get pushed into repos since this

[Bug 1570874] Installing perl-PAR-Packer causes perl DOWNGRADE

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570874 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PAR-Packer-1.041-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1570373] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.034 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570373 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.034-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug

[Bug 1574110] perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile-0.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574110 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[rpms/perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile] New Commits To "rpms/perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile on branch master, which you are following: ed80930c102661811602f2b208a668f71ec018bcJitka Plesnikova0.009 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1574061] perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir-0.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574061 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[rpms/perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir] New Commits To "rpms/perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir on branch master, which you are following: 42e90dad15c41a2a355c1e2044141b6a58c63cddJitka Plesnikova0.007 bump To view more about the commits, visit: