[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 41 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5aca1d385d remctl-3.14-1.el6 38 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b python34-3.4.8-1.el6 13

[Bug 1568834] Missing BuildRequires: kde-filesystem in perl-Qt.spec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Qt-4.14.3-14.fc28

[Bug 1579524] perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-411.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1576612] perl-experimental-0.020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576612 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.020-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1576612] perl-experimental-0.020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576612 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.020-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1576612] perl-experimental-0.020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576612 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.020-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1579524] perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1580012] New: perl-YAML-1.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580012 Bug ID: 1580012 Summary: perl-YAML-1.26 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-YAML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 1580002] New: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580002 Bug ID: 1580002 Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-0.29 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Test-Announce] 2018-05-21 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2018-05-21 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We haven't met for a few weeks, so let's check in on how things are going with Fedora 29, Test Days

Re: macro(s) to use in RPM spec for /usr/lib/modules-load.d

> "ES" == Eric Smith writes: ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory ES> like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if libdir ES> is /usr/lib64? Is there something better than ES> %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d? It seems that

macro(s) to use in RPM spec for /usr/lib/modules-load.d

What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if libdir is /usr/lib64? Is there something better than %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d? ___ devel mailing list --

Re: libidn soname bump

On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 15:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 17:53 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > The libidn upstream has released 1.35, which increments the soname. > > I'm planning to update the package on the next Tuesday. > > > > The following packages will need to be

Re: libidn soname bump

On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 17:53 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > The libidn upstream has released 1.35, which increments the soname. > I'm planning to update the package on the next Tuesday. > > The following packages will need to be rebuilt. I don't see anything > critical that should break the

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

On 05/18/2018 04:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: It would be nice if both architectures could be made available in the epel wine package I'll say it one more (last) time: epel(*) cannot build i686 packages (*) In it's current setup. There's been previous talk about using centos7

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

Ken Taylor wrote: > It would be nice if both architectures could be made available in the > epel wine package I'll say it one more (last) time: epel(*) cannot build i686 packages (*) In it's current setup. There's been previous talk about using centos7 i686 for this purpose... but so far

Re: Need Sponsor: PrestoPalette

I will take care of this. *William Moreno Reyes* Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor ___ devel mailing list --

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

On 05/18/2018 02:14 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ricardo J. Barberis wrote: El Viernes 18/05/2018 a las 00:33, Rex Dieter escribió: Ken Taylor wrote: On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a newly installed

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

Ricardo J. Barberis wrote: > El Viernes 18/05/2018 a las 00:33, Rex Dieter escribió: >> Ken Taylor wrote: >> > On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> Ken Taylor wrote: >> >>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a >> >>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine.

Re: Release fedpkg-1.33

On 17 May 2018 at 06:51, Chenxiong Qi wrote: [..] > fedpkg has been compatible with Python 3, and defaults to Python 3 in > rawhide. Thanks Miro Hrončok for your patch to build Python 3 package. Despite what you just wrote still it is not possible to use it without python2

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

El Viernes 18/05/2018 a las 00:33, Rex Dieter escribió: > Ken Taylor wrote: > > On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Ken Taylor wrote: > >>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a > >>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine. >

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-05-18)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-05-18/fesco.2018-05-18-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-05-18/fesco.2018-05-18-15.00.txt Log:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On 05/17/2018 06:53 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I think with our horrible history of naming this project EPEC is what we go with. I just want the new logo not to look like a horse's butt with tail. Already taken.

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48184 clean up and delete connections at shutdown

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48184 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49701 A bit of history around that fix. An original fix was done for 48184 [1]. This fix introduced a regression [2] that we failed to fix fast enough and the fix was finally backout [3]. The current PR [4]

RFE: update xmlgraphics-commons up to ver. 2.2 in Fedora 28

Hello All! This package, xmlgraphics-commons, didn't receive much attention recently, so we missed an opportunity to update it in Fedora 28 without hurry. Unfortunatelyit seems that we have to. Recently updated pdfbox (which has a subpackage fontbox, a Fop dependency) makes fop-2.0 unable to

[Bug 1579524] perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-405.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bd2f57abfe -- You are receiving this mail

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Fri, 18 May 2018 at 11:29, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html > Thanks for bringing this up. > > This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN

[Bug 1579524] perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:27 AM Martin Jackson wrote: > I agree that it makes sense to associate EPIC releases with EL "point" > or "y" releases. > Some orgs (like us) download new content on timers, and while it's not > wrong to say that people should read release notes and

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

I agree that it makes sense to associate EPIC releases with EL "point" or "y" releases. Some orgs (like us) download new content on timers, and while it's not wrong to say that people should read release notes and updates, there is currently a *lot* of content in EPEL etc to keep track of,

[Bug 1579524] perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-411.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-efd392524a -- You are receiving this mail

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49576 - Adjust ds-replcheck tool for new conflict entries

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49576 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49700 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Help needed for Reviews

Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 21:56 +0200 schrieb Robert-André Mauchin: > On jeudi 10 mai 2018 14:28:09 CEST you wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a few Golang and Python packages that need review, any help > > appreciated. I can do any review in exchange. > > > > Rclone dependency: > > > > -

Re: May 2018 Elections: Nomination & Campaign period is open

This is just a reminder that on 2018-May-22 at 23:59:59 UTC we will close the Nomination window of May-2018 Elections. Please check the nomination pages [1][2][3] and apply, if you are interested to work in FESCo, Council or Mindshare teams. [1]

[Bug 1579524] perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html Thanks for bringing this up. > This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN modules will need to > change to MetaCPAN URLs. Well, that's sad news. Regarding

CPAN Search Going Away

See https://log.perl.org/2018/05/goodbye-search-dot-cpan-dot-org.html This means that the URLs included in RPMs of CPAN modules will need to change to MetaCPAN URLs. Please let me know if I can be any help making this happen. Dave... ___ perl-devel

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:23 AM Björn 'besser82' Esser < besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 17:51 + schrieb Fabio Valentini: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:45 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > m> > > wrote: > > > > > Sure, > > > I think we can take

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 17:51 + schrieb Fabio Valentini: > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:45 PM Frantisek Zatloukal m> > wrote: > > > Sure, > > I think we can take my spec from copr[0], which I've worked on with > > vondruch. Proper feature tests won't run until we get

[Bug 1576611] perl-Business-ISSN-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576611 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Fedora Rawhide-20180517.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180516.n.0): ID: 238718 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/238718 ID: 238743 Test: x86_64