Include qt5pas subpackage to lazarus package

2018-08-02 Thread Vascom
Hi. Can anyone contact with maintainers of lazarus https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lazarus ? Because they unresponsive to my requests few month. I just want add qt5pas subpachage by this pull-request https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lazarus/pull-request/3 -- Best regards, Vaasiliy Glazov ___

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

2018-08-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:12 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 08/02/2018 05:04 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > This might surprise you, but I actually prefer the current way. It > > makes activating Rawhide an explicit action that can stay carried > > forward. > > The same for the proposed change, once you

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Dominique Martinet
Rex Dieter wrote on Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:14:13AM -0500: > Dominique Martinet wrote: > > In practice, `pkg-config --cflags foo` will only fetch cflags for > > dependencies listed in Requires, not Requires.private > > pkg-config --cflags foo > fetches cflags of Requires.private items in foo.pc fo

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

2018-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 08/02/2018 05:04 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > This might surprise you, but I actually prefer the current way. It > makes activating Rawhide an explicit action that can stay carried > forward. The same for the proposed change, once you install fedora-release from rawhide you are on rawhide until an

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 08/01/2018 01:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > The list of ImageMagick CVEs is horrific - 59 open CVEs - for something > that is often going to be used in a scenario where it is fed untrustworthy > images. exiv2 is pretty concerning too with 19 open CVEs, again for > something often used wit

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

2018-08-02 Thread Athos Ribeiro
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:45:54PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote: > >There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need > > more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and > > tooling. I think that sho

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

2018-08-02 Thread Derek Parker
On 08/02/2018 12:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote: >>    There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that >> need more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging >> guidelines and tooling. I think that should be one of the first

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

2018-08-02 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote: There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and tooling. I think that should be one of the first tasks for the SIG. I'm not looking to join the SIG, but

Fedora Rawhide-20180802.n.0 compose check report

2018-08-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 49/138 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180801.n.0): ID: 262899 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262899 ID: 262901 Test: x86_6

Fedora testing-20180802.0 compose check report

2018-08-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora updates-20180802.0 compose check report

2018-08-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.28 to 0.44 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262638#downloads Current test data: https://openq

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180802.n.0 changes

2018-08-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180801.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180802.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 115 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 321.33 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
The real problem here is when you have complex frameworks like gtk. pkg-config basically will link you against gdk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk and a lot of other stuff. But in practice, not every application need to link against all of them. On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 6:11 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > Dominique Mar

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Rex Dieter
Dominique Martinet wrote: > In practice, `pkg-config --cflags foo` will only fetch cflags for > dependencies listed in Requires, not Requires.private pkg-config --cflags foo fetches cflags of Requires.private items in foo.pc for me. I've patched many packages to use that feature, and haven't not

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Dominique Martinet
Rex Dieter wrote on Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:37:34AM -0500: > > Wearing a lib developer hat, I don't see how you can make a .pc that > > doesn't overlink if you provide something a bit entangled with other > > libs. > > The problem is that if your headers use any sub-lib type you need to add > > tha

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Rex Dieter
Dominique Martinet wrote: > Karel Zak wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 01:17:29PM +0200: >> Well, --as-needed is workaround and nothing else. The real problem is >> mess in makefiles and .pc (pkg-config) files. >> >> It would be better to use --as-needed for testing purpose only, and >> ask maintain

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 10:49 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > > Thank you Huzaifa for bringing that up. I have a talk on fedora > > > and > > > crypto in flock, and my recommendation will be towards having > > > some > > > process to remove old packages from fedora. CVEs were not the > >

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

2018-08-02 Thread Michal Novotny
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > Hello devel list, > > > > this is a request for comments for a recent proposal I filed at releng > tracker: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7445 > > > > In short, package managers on

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

2018-08-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hello devel list, > > this is a request for comments for a recent proposal I filed at releng > tracker: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7445 > > In short, package managers on Rawhide would no longer replace $releasever > variable with a num

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

2018-08-02 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 31.7.2018 v 15:04 Kamil Paral napsal(a): > In short, package managers on Rawhide would no longer replace $releasever > variable with a numerical value (like '29' at > this moment, soon '30'), but with 'rawhide' string instead. I hope this > change will make life a bit easier for > third-party

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:54:21PM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > On 08/01/2018 02:16 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:40:20AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > >> On 07/31/2018 08:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >>> Then, from that list of packages, do we have

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:45:00AM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Wearing a lib developer hat, I don't see how you can make a .pc that > doesn't overlink if you provide something a bit entangled with other > libs. > The problem is that if your headers use any sub-lib type you need to add > that

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:49:13PM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > On 08/01/2018 01:19 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:09 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I was asked to bring this issue[1] to the developer community before > >> FESCO make

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

2018-08-02 Thread Dominique Martinet
Karel Zak wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 01:17:29PM +0200: > Well, --as-needed is workaround and nothing else. The real problem is > mess in makefiles and .pc (pkg-config) files. > > It would be better to use --as-needed for testing purpose only, and > ask maintainers why the result with --as-nee

Java auto-requires generator change

2018-08-02 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
FPC decided [1] that Java packages must require javapckages-filesystem instead of javapackages-tools. I've just updated [2] upstream code generator code to comply with updated packaging guidelines and backported [3] the patch to rawhide. [1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/781 [2] http

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Björn Persson
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > and even further than that, if > there is no update (upstream release) for 5 years, the > package+dependencies is marked for removal as well. Cancelling that > process would have to go through a fedora committee. It may be rare but there is such a thing as stable

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
On 08/01/2018 02:16 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:40:20AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: >> On 07/31/2018 08:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> >>> >>> Do we have any analysis showing what would be the fallout if we applied >>> these purge rules today ? ie what pack

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
On 08/01/2018 01:19 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:09 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I was asked to bring this issue[1] to the developer community before >> FESCO makes a decision. >> >> In several instances[2] there exists packages in Fedora, in w

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

2018-08-02 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
On 08/01/2018 01:41 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:33:11AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: >> On 07/31/2018 08:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> 1. If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is open against a package in Fedora-X and by the time X is EOL and the issu