Re: Plans for Matplotlib 3.0+

On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 18:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17.8.2018 21:51, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 17.8.2018 20:20, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > On Friday, 17 August 2018

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:49 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> >> So this is the email announcing orphaning js-jquery1: >> >> >>

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Excerpts from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek's message of 2018-08-28 08:38 +00:00: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote: > > What does it mean for a package to be owned by orphan while it still > > has other admins who are real people? > > > > Is this some kind of edge

Re: Rawhide python3-devel conflict issue

On mardi 28 août 2018 22:24:09 CEST BJH2017 wrote: > Hi, > > I build Vim (bleeding-edge package, updated within a day of the latest > upstream release) for Fedora Rawhide, among many other platforms, > using the openSUSE Build Service and the delightful issue I've found > is that python3-devel

[EPEL-devel] 2018-08-29 EPEL Steering Committee Meeting Agenda

#startmeeting EPEL (2018-08-29) #meetingname epel #topic Chair and Introductions #chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge #topic Emergency Business #info This is where items needing to be discussed right away go #topic EL-6 end of life #info EL-6 will be reaching its end of life in late 2020.

Re: Heads-up: ImageMagick SONAME bump

On 08/28/2018 01:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: ImageMagick 6.9.9 => 6.9.10 introduces a SONAME bump from .so.5 to .so.6. I'll rebuild what I can, but please help out if you have some spare cycles. Owners have been BCC'd. Rebuilds are complete. A handful of FTBFS bugs have been filed.

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-7 x86_64 repoclosure failure

Slight correction: both python2-crypto and python2-libcomps exist in upstream as python2-*. I got confused while generating the list because they both have previous versions in upstream as python-*, but those have been obsoleted by newer packages with name python2-*. As a result, removing them

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-7 x86_64 repoclosure failure

Breaking it down a bit more, the following EPEL7 packages are in the CentOS 7.5 base and/or updates repositories: cloud-utils-growpart finch finch-devel fio gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-dock golang-github-godbus-dbus-devel hsakmt hsakmt-devel ima-evm-utils ima-evm-utils-devel libappindicator

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 Laura Pardo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1623271 -- You are receiving this

Re: Rawhide python3-devel conflict issue

On mardi 28 août 2018 22:24:09 CEST BJH2017 wrote: > Hi, > > I build Vim (bleeding-edge package, updated within a day of the latest > upstream release) for Fedora Rawhide, among many other platforms, > using the openSUSE Build Service and the delightful issue I've found > is that python3-devel

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 Laura Pardo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1623265 (CVE-2011-2767) Referenced

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 Laura Pardo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1623268, 1623267, 1623269 --- Comment

[Bug 1623268] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [epel-7]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623268 Laura Pardo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1623265 (CVE-2011-2767) Referenced

[Bug 1623268] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [epel-7]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623268 --- Comment #1 from Laura Pardo --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1623268] New: CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [epel-7]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623268 Bug ID: 1623268 Summary: CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [epel-7] Product: Fedora EPEL

[Bug 1623267] New: CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 Bug ID: 1623267 Summary: CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all] Product: Fedora

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #1 from Laura Pardo --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1623265] New: CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 Bug ID: 1623265 Summary: CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess Product: Security Response

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-7 x86_64 repoclosure failure

I did a bit more digging and found that the following packages in EPEL7 also exist in upstream CentOS 7.5. Note that many of the python2-* packages are in upstream as python-*. I have marked these with a * at the end. These are particularly troublesome because, while fully-overlapping names is

Re: Rawhide python3-devel conflict issue

On 28.8.2018 22:24, BJH2017 wrote: Hi, I build Vim (bleeding-edge package, updated within a day of the latest upstream release) for Fedora Rawhide, among many other platforms, using the openSUSE Build Service and the delightful issue I've found is that python3-devel cannot be installed by the

Rawhide python3-devel conflict issue

Hi, I build Vim (bleeding-edge package, updated within a day of the latest upstream release) for Fedora Rawhide, among many other platforms, using the openSUSE Build Service and the delightful issue I've found is that python3-devel cannot be installed by the OBS due to a conflict between

Re: Idea: let's use Pagure to track Changes

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:52:57PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 23.8.2018 22:43, Ben Cotton wrote: > > >Hi community, > > > > > >We've traditionally used the wiki for Change proposals because it's > >

Re: Heads-up: ImageMagick SONAME bump

On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 13:34 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > ImageMagick 6.9.9 => 6.9.10 introduces a SONAME bump from .so.5 to .so.6. > I'll > rebuild what I can, but please help out if you have some spare cycles. Owners > have > been BCC'd. This is STILL not how you are supposed to do

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 blocker review for this week

Hi folks! So, sorry I did not schedule or cancel a blocker review meeting for this week - I kinda overlooked it, and also thought there were fewer blockers to discuss than there actually are. Problem is, I can't really run a blocker meeting any other day this week either, as I'll be at Open

Heads-up: ImageMagick SONAME bump

ImageMagick 6.9.9 => 6.9.10 introduces a SONAME bump from .so.5 to .so.6. I'll rebuild what I can, but please help out if you have some spare cycles. Owners have been BCC'd. dnf repoquery --whatrequires libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.5\(\)\(64bit\) --releasever=30: WINGs-libs-0:0.95.8-10.fc29.x86_64

Re: Maintenance of arbitrary branches of orphaned package

On 08/27/2018 04:24 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Suppose I am main admin of a package which I would like to orphan in > release branches, but keep maintaining the package in arbitrary [1] > branches, which are used for building modules. Would this considered > as a valid approach? I would think

Re: Buildroot-only modules

On 08/27/2018 04:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users. > Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other > modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is implemented, > such modules could also be used

Re: [modularity] Managing module lifecycles — let's talk!

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 7:26 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > == Approaches > > Option 1: The current, yet unfinished approach > > We specify an EOL (end of life) date for each stream branch of individual > packages. This is done when requesting a new stream branch for a package [2] > by passing "--sl

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 08/28/2018 02:56 PM, Zamir SUN wrote: > Seems zopfli is used for fedora-logos[1], and this causes a lot of > package to be listed here. I've just adopted rpms/zopfli. > > I am just curious if there are any plan for fedora-logos to switch to > new optimizing tools, or the better choice can be

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

Le 2018-08-28 16:58, Vít Ondruch a écrit : Just FTR, the logic is more or less there. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bootstrapping https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/789 together with: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/7 I hadn't

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 08/28/2018 06:04 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > ZJ> Unfortunately there is no "button" in pagure, and the process to > ZJ> take a package is a manual releng ticket. > > If you're an admin then you can click the "Give the XXX project"

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: ZJ> Unfortunately there is no "button" in pagure, and the process to ZJ> take a package is a manual releng ticket. If you're an admin then you can click the "Give the XXX project" button at the bottom. That will change the "main admin", and I'm

Re: Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

On 28.8.2018 17:25, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 29

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 00:03 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > waffle orphan 24 weeks ago Dependency for piglit, taken. - ajax ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

Le 2018-08-28 13:49, Jakub Cajka a écrit : Hi Jakub I could spend some time on most of those (though I'd rather pass on B, already done my part, and D/E would be the most fun and probably the most useful for the rest of the SIG). For B I would much appreciate if you would mark which parts of

f29-backgrounds theme ready for testing

Hello team, f29-backgrounds is ready for testing towards Fedora 29 Beta release. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/desktop-backgrounds-29.0.0-1.fc29%20f29-backgrounds-29.0.0-2.fc29 Please rate it to push to the stable repository. Thank you. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer

Re: Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule[1], with several > significant cut-offs. First of all today is > the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 29 > packages must be submitted to >

[Bug 1619655] Upgrade perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence to 0.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619655 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius --- Jitka, who do you think you are? With all due respect, I consider what you did here to be disrespectful and rude and a provocation. I neither welcome you spamming BZ with your "upgrade notices" nor do

[Bug 1622999] perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/ connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-14.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3c95db499a -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1622999] perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/ connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Version|rawhide

Re: python-pycrypto package?

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 10:55:28 -0400 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 00:49, Joseph D. Wagner > wrote: > > > > Is python-pycrypto a package? If not, I'm starting to think it > > should be. I'm seeing it show up as requirements for some python > > projects I'd like to work

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

Dne 28.8.2018 v 13:47 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : >> Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it >> might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just >> need the library itself. If the drivers themselves

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Dne 28.8.2018 v 16:15 Till Maas napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> I'd like to keep the packages above. >> >> And I'll be very happy if the packages listed bellow are retired. Most >> of them are orphaned without comaintainers, that is fine. However

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:49 AM Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > > So this is the email announcing orphaning js-jquery1: > > >

[Bug 1622483] perl-MCE-1.837 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622483 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MCE-1.837-1.fc29 perl-MCE-Shared-1.839-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fadf157880 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1622484] Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.839

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: Build failure with -Wl,--as-needed

On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Marek Kasik wrote: I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this build failure while working on a pull request.  It seems to be fallout from the -Wl,--as-needed change.  Any idea why this is happening? it could be a consequence of the bug

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] lazy loading of filelists.xml to speed up dnf

Dne 28.8.2018 v 13:56 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > Le 2018-08-08 22:48, Jeff Johnson a écrit : >> My issue is the misdirection discussing lazy filelist downloading as a >> "solution" to the "problem" of huge amounts of data that is forced to >> be downloaded and loaded. >> >> The issue has been

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 28.8.2018 16:04, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.8.2018 v 00:03 Till Maas napsal(a): The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I'd like to keep the packages above. > > And I'll be very happy if the packages listed bellow are retired. Most > of them are orphaned without comaintainers, that is fine. However some > appears to have co-maintainers, which is not

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

Le 2018-08-28 15:27, Adam Jackson a écrit : On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 13:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : > Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it > might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just > need

[Bug 1622481] Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622481 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (f29). "Update to 1.839 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2018-08-28 14:08:24 UTC From b3435a0b63ff82fa87e424ba95d6abd39b1ca05e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 28 2018 14:01:49 + Subject: Update to 1.839 - New upstream release 1.839 - Seeds the Math::Random::MT::Auto generator automatically when

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:49 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > So this is the email announcing orphaning js-jquery1: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MI7W7TT3MUGMQTLYZYE5FKXUJCKFUXU7/ > > But apparently it is used by more packages then just a few.

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Dne 28.8.2018 v 00:03 Till Maas napsal(a): > The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package > and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that > the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (master). "Update to 1.839 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2018-08-28 14:02:22 UTC From b3435a0b63ff82fa87e424ba95d6abd39b1ca05e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 28 2018 14:01:49 + Subject: Update to 1.839 - New upstream release 1.839 - Seeds the Math::Random::MT::Auto generator automatically when

[389-devel] Logout not supported by the browser

When I click on the logout popup button for the "tpsadmin" user, a dialog pops up with the error message: "Logout not supported by the browser. Please clear Active Logins or close the browser." As far as I can tell, the logout doesn't actually do anything. Is this a bug, or unimplemented

Re: Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

On 28.8.2018 02:06, Mohan Boddu wrote: Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 29 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] lazy loading of filelists.xml to speed up dnf

Le 2018-08-28 15:00, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : And no, I'm afraid it does *not* scale since the exclusions from another repository may not be appropriate to the repository one is currently building, and automatically including that whitelist is automatically mismatching the content database

[Bug 1622483] perl-MCE-1.837 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622483 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 13:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : > > Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it > > might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just > > need the library itself. If the drivers

Re: Build failure with -Wl,--as-needed

Hi, On 08/28/2018 04:32 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi, I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this build failure while working on a pull request.  It seems to be fallout from the -Wl,--as-needed change.  Any idea why this is happening? it could be a consequence of

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 08/28/2018 06:03 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Depending on: zopfli (22), status change: 2017-11-05 (42 weeks ago) > fedora-logos (maintained by: alexl, caillon, caolanm, johnp, mbarnes, > rhughes, rstrode, spot, ssp) > fedora-logos-28.0.3-2.fc29.src requires zopfli =

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] lazy loading of filelists.xml to speed up dnf

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:57 AM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le 2018-08-08 22:48, Jeff Johnson a écrit : > > My issue is the misdirection discussing lazy filelist downloading as a > > "solution" to the "problem" of huge amounts of data that is forced to > > be downloaded and loaded. > > > > The

Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 29 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be

Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 29 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be

[Bug 1622999] perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/ connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 126976 -- You are receiving this

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Dne 28.8.2018 v 00:03 Till Maas napsal(a): > > Package(co)maintainers Status Change > === > js-jquery1 ctubbsii, jamielinux, 5 weeks ago >

Re: fedora-tagger sunset - week post F29 beta freeze

Mattia Verga wrote: > The Group tag would not fix exactly what I mean. I wouldn't want to create > groups of packages, but apply descriptive tags of the abilities of the > package. > For example, in some of the packages I maintain: > ccdciel: astronomy, astrophotography, imaging, telescope >

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] lazy loading of filelists.xml to speed up dnf

Le 2018-08-08 22:48, Jeff Johnson a écrit : My issue is the misdirection discussing lazy filelist downloading as a "solution" to the "problem" of huge amounts of data that is forced to be downloaded and loaded. The issue has been discussed repeatedly without a solution. Adding -- and

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 10:37:06 AM > Subject: Re: Golang SIG primary goals? > > Hi, > > Just to get people thinking before the meet… > > IMHO, the core

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just need the library itself. If the drivers themselves have non-trivial dependencies, the buildroot is more likely to

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > However, my initial objectives were to produce clean prometheus and > grafana Fedora packages, I finished the Go part a few months ago, but > they both include a javascript layer, so I'll probably have to spend > part of my packaging

[Bug 1622999] New: perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/ connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622999 Bug ID: 1622999 Summary: perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-13.fc30 FTBFS: t/connect_hook_nodata.t fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

[Bug 1622996] perl-Git-Repository-1.322-3.fc30 FTBFS: t/ 24-errors.t fails with git 2.19.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622996 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Git-Repository-1.322-3 |perl-Git-Repository-1.322-3

[Bug 1622996] New: perl-Git-Repository-1.322-3.fc30 FTBFS:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622996 Bug ID: 1622996 Summary: perl-Git-Repository-1.322-3.fc30 FTBFS: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Git-Repository Assignee: jpazdzi...@redhat.com Reporter:

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

Hi, Just to get people thinking before the meet… IMHO, the core objective of the SIG should be to maintain a consistent self-hosting up-to-date baseline of Go software in rpm form, that can then be used to build other forms of Fedora deliverables (flatpacks, coreos images, etc) That

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Hello everyone. > sagitter: lzma Although LZMA Utils are no longer developed and replaced by XZ, they're still required by other packages on Fedora. lzma package is still correctly compiled on fedora 28+, it can endure for a little while yet as long as all dependent software migrate to XZ.

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:03:26AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > dpkg 0 weeks ago So this one has caused us trouble. virt-dib depends on debootstrap (a Debian tool for installing chroots), and debootstrap obviously depends quite

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

I think that this list way longer. It is other quite easy method to filter all those packages which are now under thread to be removed, Below oneliner has been executed in directory with yesterday synced rawhide src.rpm mirror: [tkloczko@domek fedora]$ for i in {20..30}; do echo "fc$i $( ls -1

Re: Automating Package Review

Le 2018-08-16 22:09, Stephen Gallagher a écrit : I'd *really* like to see us get to a point where package review is fully-automated. Basically we could just have a web-service that you pass a URL to an SRPM plus authenticate with your FAS account and it will perform all of the validity checks

[Bug 1619655] Upgrade perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence to 0.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619655 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:04 AM Till Maas wrote: > VLGothic-fonts orphan 55 weeks ago This has been renamed to vlgothic-fonts quite while ago so we could safely remove it. > The following packages require above mentioned packages: > Depending on: Canna

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

- Original Message - > So audiofile has eight current maintainers (plus all of gnome-sig) but > somehow none of those maintainers has admin privileges on the > repository. Would any of the maintainers like be made an admin so that > SDL and everything that depends on it can drop out of

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:00:54AM +0200, Bob Mauchin wrote: > > Can someone reassign dnscrypt-proxy to me, eclipseo, I have updated the > project recently and I follow upstream closely. What's the procedure to > adopt it? I assigned it to you. The usual process is to file a releng ticket

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote: > Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00: > > python-configobj fale, lmacken, orphan, 45 weeks ago > >terjeros >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 28.8.2018 11:00, Bob Mauchin wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, 00:04 Till Maas, > wrote: The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, 00:04 Till Maas, wrote: > The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package > and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure that > the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Fwd: fedora-tagger sunset - week post F29 beta freeze

On 2018-08-28, Mattia Verga wrote: >> On 2018-08-26, Mattia Verga > :( >> >> -- Petr > The Group tag would not fix exactly what I mean. I wouldn't want to > create groups of packages, but apply descriptive tags of the abilities > of the

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote: > Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00: > What does it mean for a package to be owned by orphan while it still has > other admins who are real people? > > Is this some kind of edge case where the package was

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e35dce1f57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2f51eeccf0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6f39f62cb5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fwd: fedora-tagger sunset - week post F29 beta freeze

> On 2018-08-26, Mattia Verga :( > > -- Petr The Group tag would not fix exactly what I mean. I wouldn't want to create groups of packages, but apply descriptive tags of the abilities of the package. For example, in some of the packages

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00: > python-configobj fale, lmacken, orphan, 45 weeks ago >terjeros [...] I will take python-configobj if nobody else will... BUT I don't quite