Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

OK, builds done and the 3.30.0 megaupdate is in Bodhi now and queued for updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85d637c544 -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora 29 Beta blocker status mail #1

Hi folks! As we've only got a week to go for Beta, here's an update on blocker bug status. tl;dr action summary Accepted blockers - 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582524 ACTION: QA / reporter to verify whether fixed in 3.2.0-2.fc29 2.

Python 2 Package Removal and when to use fedora-obsolete-packages

I'm thinking about removing some of my Python 2 subpackages (that are no longer used). However, I'm wondering about the case where the removed packages should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages. I don't _think_ the removal of my packages would cause any problems upon upgrade. Can someone

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-09-08 - 90% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/08/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180907git8ff8cb8.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

License change for rust-ryu

rust-ryu-0.2.6-1.fc30 has broadened its license from just "ASL 2.0" to "ASL 2.0 or Boost". The upstream change [1] follows the change in the C original [2]. [1] https://github.com/dtolnay/ryu/commit/a8d82216155b547c95d05b7689a6f70d535f2df3 [2]

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

> "RG" == Raphael Groner writes: RG> Does this deprecation of python2 mean requests for package review RG> with python2 only are now invalid? Well they certainly shouldn't be approved; the idea of deprecating packages in this manner is to prevent the set of things which depend on them from

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: CM> As I think about it, new-kernel-pkg is part of grubby. Yes, I assume it will go away and we'll be left with only the install-kernel infrastructure. Which would strip at least three layers from this onion. It also conveniently forces the issue, since it's

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: > > CM> But also the first new-kernel-pkg with --install calls grubby with > CM> makedefault, which is what I think is setting grubenv with the new > CM> kernel variable before the initramfs and final

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: CM> But also the first new-kernel-pkg with --install calls grubby with CM> makedefault, which is what I think is setting grubenv with the new CM> kernel variable before the initramfs and final grub.cfg modification CM> are done. Right, which is why I wonder if

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: > > CM> Well, I can't really parse this very well, but the default kernel > CM> looks like it is changed by grubby, but I can't figure out the > CM> ordering. It's seems plausible, perhaps likely,

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

I mailed the co-maintainers for python-jmespath last week, heard from one that he didn't want to be point of contact on it, didn't hear from the others, so I went ahead and took it over. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 19:22 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Friday, 7 September 2018 18.01.17 WEST Adam Williamson wrote: > > > python-multiprocessing orphan 3 weeks ago > > > > This is a pretty significant and commonly-used lib... > > Although you are right

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:01 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 10:29 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > > fbset orphan 56 weeks ago > > I feel like there's still some code somewhere in system install / early > init that calls fbset for

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: CM> Well, I can't really parse this very well, but the default kernel CM> looks like it is changed by grubby, but I can't figure out the CM> ordering. It's seems plausible, perhaps likely, that it starts off CM> dracut and the grub2-editenv at the same time,

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > I guess if the end goal is to remove grubby from the process entirely > then it's not worth digging too deeply why it's doing this. But maybe a > quick fix would be obvious to someone who knows how that works. > Well, I can't

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: CM> Why is /var/tmp running out of space? Is that really important? In this case it was due to things simply being too small (they are minimal VMs, after all) and dnf caching packages there. The fact that dnf downloads a significant but quite variable amount

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-09-10)

The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-09-10 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues

FESCo Resgination

Hello all I informed FESCo last week that I resigned from FESCo. They have since asked that I do it publicly. It has again been an honor to serve the Fedora community, however I resign effective immediately. This in no way reflects anything other than my inability to fill the role in the

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

On Friday, 7 September 2018 18.01.17 WEST Adam Williamson wrote: > > python-multiprocessing orphan 3 weeks ago > > This is a pretty significant and commonly-used lib... Although you are right about the significance of the package IIRC this module belongs to

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: > > CM> A few releases ago, Anaconda now defaults to a 1GiB boot partition > CM> which should prevent the problem you're describing for anyone using > CM> the default 3 retained kernels, as well as

Re: Browsing Orphaned Packages (WAS: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07))

Try to ask pagure (response takes a long time): https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan Though pagure can't resolve the b0rken dependencies. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Mass Python 2 Package Removal

On 08/20/2018 04:41 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > Python 2 will be deprecated in Fedora. Packagers can mark any other > Python 2 packages as deprecated as well. I didn't know there was a way to do this, but the change page does link to a policy for it:

Fedora Rawhide-20180907.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 78/132 (x86_64), 22/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180906.n.0): ID: 275942 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275942 ID: 275945 Test: x86_64

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

Does this deprecation of python2 mean requests for package review with python2 only are now invalid? For instance, I've asked upstream of pyVirtualize [+] for support of python3 [++]. Any patch to get pyvirtualize [+++] as a package to build with python3 is very welcome, though it's not the

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

I can take thermald and lightdm-gtk. Thanks! David On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Friday, 07 September 2018 at 11:46, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I've recently completed two nonresponsive maintainers policies. > > > >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 10:29 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > fbset orphan 56 weeks ago I feel like there's still some code somewhere in system install / early init that calls fbset for some reason...anyone know what I'm talking about? > lzma

Re: Brainstorming about kernel updates with low disk space

> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes: CM> A few releases ago, Anaconda now defaults to a 1GiB boot partition CM> which should prevent the problem you're describing for anyone using CM> the default 3 retained kernels, as well as the extra kdump initramfs CM> if you're using kdump (not enabled by

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

Hi Bastien, Here are some of the benefits I see of this effort as compared to simply telling users to consume Flatpaks from Flathub or independent repositories: * Benefit to Flaptak users on all distributions: more applications are available more quickly. Some applications will be much easier to

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-11.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-11.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

In line with the "Mass Python 2 Package Removal" Fedora 30 Change [0], we've just marked python2 and all it's subpackages as deprecated in rawhide [1]. No new packages can depend on python2 except renames and FESCo/FPC exceptions. See more info in the Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 89 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 57 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d2e0971e9b uwsgi-2.0.17.1-1.el7 40

Browsing Orphaned Packages (WAS: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07))

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:30 AM Till Maas wrote: > The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package > > [SNIP] There's got to be some better way to present this information than in an email... some UI on a web page which can be sorted or filtered by maintainer, package name,

[Bug 1623265] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623265 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-9.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1623267] CVE-2011-2767 mod_perl: arbitrary Perl code execution in the context of the user account via a user-owned .htaccess [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623267 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- mod_perl-2.0.10-9.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

Re: Buildroot-only modules

On 2018-09-07, Petr Šabata wrote: > I suppose there could be other tools that > would allow you to download such modules so you could play with > them without polluting the "applications" repo. > Yes, there are , especially bin/moduleprovides for

[Bug 1622479] perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.015-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180907.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180906.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180907.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 88 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 19.93 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

Hey Owen, - Original Message - > I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of > graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final > pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but it's > definitely close enough to get

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07)

Hi, On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:07:02AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > When is this going to happen? Because I'm still concerned with the > js-jquery1 and I still hope somebody else will pick it up. But if not, > I'd rather pick it up prior its retirement. I guess we will discuss this in the next

Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

In line with the "Mass Python 2 Package Removal" Fedora 30 Change [0], we've just marked python2 and all it's subpackages as deprecated in rawhide [1]. No new packages can depend on python2 except renames and FESCo/FPC exceptions. See more info in the Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

On Friday, 07 September 2018 at 11:46, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I've recently completed two nonresponsive maintainers policies. > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971 > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1977 > > Here are some packages that still need maintainers: > > From

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

> On 7.9.2018 14:48, Leigh Scott wrote: > > They are not retired. They are now, I thought besser82 had done it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

On 7.9.2018 14:48, Leigh Scott wrote: mint-themes-gtk3 mint-y-theme are dead packages, they are now sub-packages of mint-themes. They are not retired. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1626461] perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-2.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626461 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com --- Comment

[Bug 1624937] Upgrade perl-AnyEvent-HTTP to 2.24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624937 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

mint-themes-gtk3 mint-y-theme are dead packages, they are now sub-packages of mint-themes. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1626461] New: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-2.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626461 Bug ID: 1626461 Summary: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-2.24 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Buildroot-only modules

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:24:06AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users. > > Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other > > modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 05:06 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > [...] > That's *very* nice & something I have been calling for basically from day > one with flatpacks. > > Not everyone wants to become a release engineer & build all the >

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 3:36 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 7.9.2018 v 03:45 Owen Taylor napsal(a): > > [...] > > If you maintain a graphical application, please try creating a Flatpak of > it. Your experience will vary - some applications are quite easy, but if > your application, for example: > >

Packages that need new maintainers

I've recently completed two nonresponsive maintainers policies. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1977 Here are some packages that still need maintainers: From https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1971: 2048-cli ColPack GarminPlugin NLopt RxCpp appmenu-qt5 arprec

afflib & lzma (was: Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-09-07))

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:29:21AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Depending on: lzma (23), status change: 2017-10-10 (47 weeks ago) > afflib (maintained by: kwizart, rebus) > afflib-3.7.16-7.fc29.src requires lzma-devel = 4.32.7-21.fc29 I had a look into this since it blocks

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Michal Konečný wrote: > I thought there will be some automatic building script for flatpaks, so > the maintainers doesn't need to do it by themselves. > Is this automatization now dropped? > One level of automation is 'fedmod rpm2flatpak' which automatically

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:15 PM Owen Taylor wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Robin Lee wrote: >> >> What does it mean for 'Fedora' Flatpaks? >> - Flatpaks that run on a Fedora runtime? Then, what's the benifit to >> use Fedora runtime instead of freedesktop ones? >> - Flatpaks that

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 05:06 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Robin Lee wrote: > > What does it mean for 'Fedora' Flatpaks? > > > > - Flatpaks that run on a Fedora runtime? Then, what's the benifit to > > > > use Fedora runtime instead of freedesktop ones? > > > > -

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Robin Lee wrote: > What does it mean for 'Fedora' Flatpaks? > - Flatpaks that run on a Fedora runtime? Then, what's the benifit to > use Fedora runtime instead of freedesktop ones? > - Flatpaks that maintained by Fedora community? Then, why not > encourage people

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

Dne 7.9.2018 v 10:23 Martin Stransky napsal(a): > On 9/7/18 9:36 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> >> Dne 7.9.2018 v 03:45 Owen Taylor napsal(a): >>> I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of >>> graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the >>> final

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On 9/7/18 9:36 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 7.9.2018 v 03:45 Owen Taylor napsal(a): I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Friday, 07 September 2018 at 03:45, Owen Taylor wrote: > I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of > graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final > pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but it's > definitely close

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

I thought there will be some automatic building script for flatpaks, so the maintainers doesn't need to do it by themselves. Is this automatization now dropped? mkonecny On 7.9.2018 03:45, Owen Taylor wrote: I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of graphical

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

Dne 7.9.2018 v 03:45 Owen Taylor napsal(a): > I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of > graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the > final pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but > it's definitely close enough to get

Re: Call for participation: Fedora Flatpaks

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Owen Taylor wrote: > > I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of > graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final > pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but it's > definitely close

Re: Self introduction: Alain Vigne

Hello ? No one interested ? How do I move forward ? On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM Alain Vigne wrote: > Hi everyone, > I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source > tools, for a long time now. > > I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream >