Hi folks! (Yep, I'm back from vacation). I'm proposing we cancel the QA
meeting tomorrow. Thanks to everyone for the great job in getting
Fedora 29 released last week! As that's done, and there's no other
pressing business I'm aware of, I figured we all deserve a break :)
There are currently
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
ID: 305032 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305032
ID: 305033 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
148 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
38 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6bc3a525a2
libmad-0.15.1b-26.el6
4
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in updates-20181104.1):
ID: 305030 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305030
ID: 305031 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
On 11/4/18 11:47 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Quoting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1538352#c1
| Yes, recordmydesktop was intentionally retired due to the project being
| abandoned (no new release in 10 years), it contained many crash bugs,
| and was not at all working on Wayland.
I don't know
I'd like to update python3-setuptools from 19.6.2 to something newer (at
least 20.8.1 but hopefully much later) without breaking the world.
However, I don't have much experience with possible setuptools breakage.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of
I'd like to update python3-setuptools from 19.6.2 to something newer (at
least 20.8.1 but hopefully much later) without breaking the world.
However, I don't have much experience with possible setuptools breakage.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:07 AM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
> On 11/3/18 5:11 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I've been working on getting a good build of FreeCAD 0.17 in Fedora
> > (long story) and I was finally able to get a good scratch build on
> > Rawhide so I decided to do a local mock build for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636864
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.28-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643851
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.20-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I've a very simple, straight
forward package that needs review:
libb64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
It's a very simple library that's needed for us to package biosig[1].
[1]
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 8:59 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, 03 November 2018 at 21:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
Doing a 'dnf autoremove' after upgrading to
Upstream LuxRender changed its name to LuxCoreRender. The source package
is submitted for re-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645913 .
Massive cleanup from the old LuxRender.spec is done. It does not
include the new macros found on the development release yet but it is
easy
On 2018-11-04 11:21 a.m., Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le dimanche 04 novembre 2018 à 11:01 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
>> On 2018-11-04 4:43 a.m., Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>> So, basically you should just need a do2unix and the following lines
>>> in
>>> rawhide:
>> I have Fedora 29 installed
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 12:17:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> recordmydesktop was retired in F27:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4RCB6MBC4JVGG4SYLIKUDOOT2REGA6N4/
>
> It's claimed that it doesn't work and is full of crash bugs, but I was
Le dimanche 04 novembre 2018 à 11:01 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
> On 2018-11-04 4:43 a.m., Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > So, basically you should just need a do2unix and the following lines
> > in
> > rawhide:
>
> I have Fedora 29 installed and the above line still led to error.
Which
On 2018-11-04 4:43 a.m., Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> So, basically you should just need a do2unix and the following lines in
> rawhide:
I have Fedora 29 installed and the above line still led to error. Maybe
porting redhat-rpm-macro to the current release will alleviate the issue.
> Name:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 8:59 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 03 November 2018 at 21:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> > >
> > > Doing a 'dnf autoremove' after upgrading to F29, yum is one of the
> > > packages it wants to
Bonvenon!
On 10/30/2018 02:03 PM, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
Hi all,
The contribution guide thingamajig told me to post a short message
here. So as follows: I am Carmen from Friesland, The Netherlands. I am
currently working on GNOME to make the GNOME desktop available in
Esperanto. At the
On Saturday, 03 November 2018 at 21:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> >
> > Doing a 'dnf autoremove' after upgrading to F29, yum is one of the
> > packages it wants to remove. Is it safe to remove yum these days?
> >
>
> Yes. Things pretty much don't
So, basically you should just need a do2unix and the following lines in
rawhide:
Name: luxcorerender
Version:2.1
%global prerelease beta1
%global forgeurl0 https://github.com/%{name}/LuxCore
%global tag0luxcorerender_v%{version}%{?prerelease}
%global
Le samedi 03 novembre 2018 à 15:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
Hi,
>Source0:
>
> https://github.com/%{name}/LuxCore/archive/luxcorerender_v%{version}.tar.gz
> Source1:
> https://github.com/%{name}/BlendLuxCore/archive/blendluxcore_v%{version}.tar.gz
> Patch0:
recordmydesktop was retired in F27:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4RCB6MBC4JVGG4SYLIKUDOOT2REGA6N4/
It's claimed that it doesn't work and is full of crash bugs, but I was
able to compile it on F29 and it works fine for me, and it's a very
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 04:10:49AM -, Daniel Newkirk wrote:
> Hi!
> My name is Daniel, and I'd love to help out the Fedora project in some
> manner. Been a Fedora user on and off since Fedora 1 (used RH 9 back in the
> day), and I've been coding with Python for about a decade
On 11/3/18 5:11 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I've been working on getting a good build of FreeCAD 0.17 in Fedora
(long story) and I was finally able to get a good scratch build on
Rawhide so I decided to do a local mock build for Fedora 28 so I could
actually test the package...
As expected it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645430
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644247
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Thank you very much for your replies.
No 'rhgb' is the workaround in my case. I added my comment to the bug
report you mentioned Fabio.
Any idea who is handling this, current status and how/when/why this will be
solved ?
BR, Alain
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:05 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
ID: 304931 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/304931
ID: 304932 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636864
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
31 matches
Mail list logo
