[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2018-12-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 175 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 126 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2018-12-01 Thread Frank Crawford
On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 10:12 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 6:59 AM Frank Crawford > wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 11:38 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

2018-12-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:24 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 08:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > Folks, hi. > > > > Planning for a specific delay for a specific reason is one thing. But > > the same design philosophy reasons that apply to Fedora 31 have > > applied

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2018-12-01 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 14:15, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

[EPEL-devel] Re: New developer toolkit beta

2018-12-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 14:44, Tom Callaway wrote: > > Just checking in on this again, still need this update to build Chromium > for EPEL7. > Sorry for the delay.. I spent some time looking for a new repository tree and it turns out they put it in the regular ones. So everyone needing newer

[Bug 1652477] Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.128

2018-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652477 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Improving the compose: leave the current compose in place

2018-12-01 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:59 AM Owen Taylor wrote: > > A lot of discussion about improving the compose process seem to end up > with a "reality check" - that ideas have already been tried but don't > work because of requirements a) b) c) d). You can't have the pony, but > maybe if a lot of effort

Re: [HEADS UP] tinyxml2 SONAME bump (7.x)

2018-12-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 11/29/18 10:08 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: And it's in rawhide. FYI: Kodi links against 'tinyxml' and not 'tinyxml2'. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Fedora Rawhide-20181201.n.0 compose check report

2018-12-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/142 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181130.n.0): ID: 314638 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/314638 ID: 314641 Test: x86_64

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

2018-12-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 08:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > Folks, hi. > > Planning for a specific delay for a specific reason is one thing. But > the same design philosophy reasons that apply to Fedora 31 have > applied to almost every other Fedora releases, and changing to an > annual cycle is

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2018-12-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 6:59 AM Frank Crawford wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 11:38 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Anyone know why this was orphaned?

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

2018-12-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Folks, hi. Planning for a specific delay for a specific reason is one thing. But the same design philosophy reasons that apply to Fedora 31 have applied to almost every other Fedora releases, and changing to an annual cycle is going to drive people *nuts* when updates for their particular

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181201.n.0 changes

2018-12-01 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181130.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181201.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 64 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.46 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2018-12-01 Thread Frank Crawford
On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 11:38 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any > message about it. > > s3cmd

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2018-12-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any > message about it. > > > s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago > > If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2018-12-01 Thread Frank Crawford
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Anyone know why this was orphaned? There doesn't seem to be any message about it. > s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on. Regards Frank ___ devel mailing