https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/03/22/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.1-20190322git0a4ee32.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 2/18/19 12:56 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c53f1a6c8
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a2e72916a
> >
> > Would someone please give them a kick?
>
> For some reason
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691568
Bug ID: 1691568
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:05:55PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Just FTR:
>
> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -w "popd|pushd" * -l| wc -l
> 2843
>
> Looks like many Fedora packagers forgot that ..
>
> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ rpm -E %_buildshell
> /bin/sh
So what? On Fedora
Just FTR:
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -w "popd|pushd" * -l| wc -l
2843
Looks like many Fedora packagers forgot that ..
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ rpm -E %_buildshell
/bin/sh
I'm not sure is it would be good to post full list of all spec files here ..
kloczek
--
Tomasz Kłoczko |
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
96 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
219 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
90 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b43fdd19c3
vcftools-0.1.16-1.el7
26
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.0 (libqalculate.so.21).
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. I did not
build v2.9.x despite my earlier email.
Are there objections if I do this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190320-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in updates-20190320.0):
ID: 369602 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/369602
Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
Installed system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190320-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685532
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Tests-1.20-1.fc29 |perl-Pod-Tests-1.20-1.fc29
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386)
ID: 369386 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/369386
ID: 369407 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688874
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690939
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-LWP-MediaTypes-6.04-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690193
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-2.26-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ack-2.26-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689665
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
Thanks for the clarification for my first question.
Michael Zhang
Software Developer Test (WAS Install Team)
Phone: 1-9054133415
E-mail: michael.zh...@ibm.com
- Original message -From: Peter Robinson To: Development discussions related to Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689355
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689608
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-SSH2-0.70-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, 18:50 Adam Williamson,
wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 17:25 +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > From the previous email, it was stated that it's mandatory to include
> > the building of the Open Liberty binaries into the rpmbuild. We are
> > planning on doing that and
OLD: Fedora-30-20190316.n.1
NEW: Fedora-30-20190321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 18
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.00 MiB
Size
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 17:25 +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> Hi
>
> From the previous email, it was stated that it's mandatory to include
> the building of the Open Liberty binaries into the rpmbuild. We are
> planning on doing that and making it publicly available through
> Github. So does that
In the Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting we decided to delay the
decision by 1 day. This will allow the creation of a new compose (in
progress) that fixes the one outstanding blocker bug. We determined
that the nature of this fix would not require the full test suite and
that delaying the decision
In the Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting we decided to delay the
decision by 1 day. This will allow the creation of a new compose (in
progress) that fixes the one outstanding blocker bug. We determined
that the nature of this fix would not require the full test suite and
that delaying the decision
HiFrom the previous email, it was stated that it's mandatory to include the building of the Open Liberty binaries into the rpmbuild. We are planning on doing that and making it publicly available through Github. So does that mean that you guys at Fedora are going to rebuild from source to publish,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 113
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Thanks a lot for starting this proposal.
I'm interested in joining this SIG!
Cheers,
Fale
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/142 (x86_64), 3/24
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 12:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[..]
> Like what exactly? E.g. all the -Wformat-security warnings are about cases
> where the format strings are constructed shortly before they are passed to
> the format attribute functions, either unmodified or through gettext.
KISS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687197
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.72-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685531
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Type-Tie-0.014-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685532
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Tests-1.20-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
On 3/21/19 9:40 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the initial version of Packit.
>
> Packit makes it easy to bring and integrate your upstream projects
> into Fedora, right now we are focused to bring upstream
> releases into Fedora rawhide. You can use packit now as a
We are pleased to announce the initial version of Packit.
Packit makes it easy to bring and integrate your upstream projects
into Fedora, right now we are focused to bring upstream
releases into Fedora rawhide. You can use packit now as a command-line
tool, soon Packit will run as a hosted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190320-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-068891af0d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190320-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e93a36abe0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190320-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4b0f61dd78
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691349
Bug ID: 1691349
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190320 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688874
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-IniFiles-3.02-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c2fcb0a01
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688874
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691325
Bug ID: 1691325
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.12
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Assignee: wjhns...@hardakers.net
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:43:49AM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
> > > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> > >
> > > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > > $1}'|sort | uniq
On 21/03/2019 09:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
"-fstack-protector-strong" is the only one that has a clearly
beneficial effect.
But then there's the overall counterargument from Jakub that we start
deviating from upstream defaults and some users will need to add counter-options
to go
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 07:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> When people see lists like this they are going to assume it is order
> of importance because if X is used N many more times, it must be much
> more important than Y. Most packagers are not because most packages
wow.. I need a
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 07:46, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
> > > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> > >
> > > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > > $1}'|sort | uniq -c | sort
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[..]
> > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> >
> > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > $1}'|sort | uniq -c | sort -nr| head -n 20
> > 485 -Wmissing-profile
> > 106
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 07:23, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 09:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> [..]
> > The effect of "-Wformat -Wformat-security" without -Werror is only more
> > warnings.
> > Unfortunately -Wformat will generate spurious warnings if the code is
>
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 09:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
[..]
> The effect of "-Wformat -Wformat-security" without -Werror is only more
> warnings.
> Unfortunately -Wformat will generate spurious warnings if the code is
> not careful to give additional information to the compiler with
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:52:02AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> On 3/15/19 9:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:15:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:56:14PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>>
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 01:36 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
>
59 matches
Mail list logo
