Re: systemd-243-rc1

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, at 4:13 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Please note that the cgroup hierarchy default remains as "hybrid". > Upstream has switched the default to "unified", but I reverted this > switch in Fedora. If there are no major issues reported with this > pre-release, the n

Fwd: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide

-- Forwarded message - From: Antonio Trande Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:27 AM Subject: Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide To: Adam Williamson I had rebuilt all them including the bootstrap step of Clp of course. 10 days have passed since then, i have erased those rebuilds. This

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

On 30. 07. 19 21:53, Dave Dykstra wrote: I don't see an answer to Jan's question about "javaewah" and think it might have gotten buried in the thread, so I'd like to say -- I have this question too. It seems something went wrong with the script that generated the list. Sorry, I've accidentally

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

I essentially want what Daniel suggested, as automatable infrastructure. (There is is larger idea of having images without systemd as well; most some-kind-of-server rpms that I consider applicable here would have to be changed a little, too, as they all pull in systemd: e.g. %systemd_ordering inst

Re: Please help with youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine.

I use youtube-dl regularly, so I'd be happy to assist in maintaining the package. FAS: suve ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs

Re: Please help with youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine.

On Tuesday, 30 July 2019 22:28:20 CEST Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > Please help with updating youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine > because I cannot do it and my comaintainers do not seem to be able to do it > as well. Add me to ydl FAS: eclipseo ___

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

- Original Message - > From: "Dave Dykstra" > To: "Alexander Scheel" > Cc: "Jan Pazdziora" , "Development discussions related > to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:45:06 PM > Subject: Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new > maintainers) > > Alex, >

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:47 PM Dave Dykstra wrote: > > Alex, > > Thanks for the quick response. I see that one of my packages > (singularity) has BuildRequires git. However, installing git on fc31 > does not install jgit. Maybe jgit is a BuildRequires of git, but it's > not clear to me that i

Re: Please help with youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine.

I'll update youtube-dl. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:28 PM, Till Maas wrote:

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

Alex, Thanks for the quick response. I see that one of my packages (singularity) has BuildRequires git. However, installing git on fc31 does not install jgit. Maybe jgit is a BuildRequires of git, but it's not clear to me that it makes sense to follow those through, since in order to build my p

Please help with youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine.

Hi, Please help with updating youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine because I cannot do it and my comaintainers do not seem to be able to do it as well. Thank you and kind regards Till ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

systemd-243-rc1

Hello everyone, a new pre-release of systemd was tagged today, and it's building in rawhide now. See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v243-rc1/NEWS for the list of changes. It's many small and medium-size bits, with improvements to random seed initialization, systemd-networkd capabilities,

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

- Original Message - > From: "Dave Dykstra" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Jan Pazdziora" > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:53:37 PM > Subject: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new > maintainers) > > I don't see an answer to Jan's que

"javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

I don't see an answer to Jan's question about "javaewah" and think it might have gotten buried in the thread, so I'd like to say -- I have this question too. It seems something went wrong with the script that generated the list. Dave On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:02:28PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

If you want small images, just use buildah. ctr=$(buildah from scratch) mnt=$(buildah mount $ctr) COPY/DnF/make install into $mnt buildah config ... $ctr buildah commit $ctr NEWIMAGE buildah push NEWIMAGE CONTAINERREGGISTY... If you want to build off of base images, you can probably create them w

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:58 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I'm starting a Minimization Objective [1] focusing on minimising the > installation size of some of the popular apps, runtimes, and other pieces of > software in Fedora. > > And there is a new Minimization Team [2] forming.

Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide

On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 20:15 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 30/07/19 19:35, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 11:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > > > MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide. > > > Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing: > > > https:/

Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide

On 30/07/19 19:35, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 11:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide. >> Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing: >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ > > Hi, there.

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On 7/30/19 10:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 18:00 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:15:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > What does it me

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

Yep. This is due to signing backlog, as the entire mass rebuild was taged into f31-ppending and has to be checked by robosignatory. ;( It seems to be moving a bit faster now... Sorry for this hassle. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: robosigning slow again (was: Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating)

On 7/30/19 9:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:49:05AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 7/27/19 8:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:08:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Yes and no, robosignatory is swamped signing the builds from the

Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide

On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 11:40 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:35 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Hi, there. It's better if you give more than one day of notice, and > > notify the maintainers of consuming packages directly. This broke coin- > > or-Clp, which in turn breaks ope

Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:35 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, there. It's better if you give more than one day of notice, and > notify the maintainers of consuming packages directly. This broke coin- > or-Clp, which in turn breaks opencv, which breaks quite a lot of other > stuff. I'm currently tr

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 12:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On 7/27/19 8:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:08:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Yes and no, robosignatory is swamped signing the builds from the > > > > mass-rebuild, whi

Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide

On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 11:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide. > Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ Hi, there. It's better if you give more than one day of notice,

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/27/19 8:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:08:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> Yes and no, robosignatory is swamped signing the builds from the >>> mass-rebuild, which means they aren't landing in the buildroot :( >> >> This is still

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:10 PM Alexander Scheel wrote: [snip] > The Java SIG is here: > > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java Is there anything special one must do to "Join" the Java SIG? I would like to join. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@li

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:07 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [SNIP] > The issue is that no one has time to take ownership of these packages. The > whole premise around Fedora's package model for the last 15 years is that the > number of packagers and the number of packages linearly grew. You mig

Re: Discussion around app retirements and categorizations by the CPE team

Hello, I'm a little late to this conversation, but is fpaste in Category 4 due to the high legal costs, or because of a lack of a maintainer? It would be sad to see fpaste go away because of legal reasons. Is there a better way to handle this? - Tim Zabel On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:12 PM Adam Wi

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

> Where this fails is where there's duplication of efforts. Take slf4j as an > example. mizdebsk maintains it in one of his various modules (it looks like > the javapackages module). We maintain it in the SIG as an ursine package so > things like Dogtag and a lot of other things don't break. When y

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 18:00 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:15:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > > > > > What does it mean for us as packagers? > > > > --

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:15:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > > > What does it mean for us as packagers? > > > -- > > > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on R

robosigning slow again (was: Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating)

On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:49:05AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/27/19 8:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:08:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Yes and no, robosignatory is swamped signing the builds from the > >> mass-rebuild, which means they aren't landi

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy" > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 12:05:59 PM > Subject: Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers > > On Tue, 30 Jul 201

release criterion change proposal related to system logging on LiveOS

Hi, Summary: On Fedora LiveOS, e.g. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190728.n.1.iso, the journal is missing the first 20-30s of all boot/startup related messages. The reason is a bit complicated, systemd-journald appears to have a bug wanting keep_free space too high, and Fedora's lives ha

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 10:55, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:48 PM Alexander Scheel > wrote: > >> >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Christopher" >> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> >> > Cc: "Fabio Vale

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

I would be especially interested in minimizing container images. I'd like to e.g. see purpose-built containers without an actual package manager inside. You just have the container, mount the config, and go. We're also trying to minimize Fedora CoreOS[1], so this is definitely a topic of overall in

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I'm starting a Minimization Objective [1] focusing on minimising the > installation size of some of the popular apps, runtimes, and other pieces of > software in Fedora. > > And there is a new Minimization Team [2] forming

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

> "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes: PM> So a big +1 for sysusers in sub-packages + file trigger to handle PM> running systemd-sysusers. It solves more problems than the current PM> sysusers-proposal and in a far more elegant way at that. It's great that you agree. That leaves all of the detai

Re: Mock - signal reaction

On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:59:13 PM CEST Jan Buchmaier wrote: > Do we want to catch/process SIGABRT as well? I see no obvious use case for catching SIGABRT by mock. Why are you asking about SIGABRT specifically? Kamil ___ devel mailing list -- devel@

Re: Mock - signal reaction

Do we want to catch/process SIGABRT as well? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

Join the new Minimization Team

Hi everyone! I'm starting a Minimization Objective [1] focusing on minimising the installation size of some of the popular apps, runtimes, and other pieces of software in Fedora. And there is a new Minimization Team [2] forming. Members of the team will consult and work with Fedora maintainers, d

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:48 PM Alexander Scheel wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Christopher" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > Cc: "Fabio Valentini" > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:14:57 PM > > Subject: Re: Over 50

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

- Original Message - > From: "Christopher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Fabio Valentini" > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:14:57 PM > Subject: Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Alexander Scheel wrot

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

* Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:15:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> What are the actual tag names? I have a glibc build which appears to be >> stuck in f31-updates-candidate: >> >> >> >> I wonder if this is

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:15:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > What does it mean for us as packagers? > > -- > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > > a new koji tag (which will be the defaul

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:16 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > > What does it mean for us as packagers? > > -- > > > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > > a new koji tag (which will be the default target

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:47 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 7/15/19 6:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:52 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:04 AM Miroslav Suchý

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

* Pierre-Yves Chibon: > What does it mean for us as packagers? > -- > > When you run `fedpkg build` on Rawhide, your package will be built in > a new koji tag (which will be the default target for Rawhide). The > package will be picked up from this koji tag, sig

Fedora-Rawhide-20190730.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 18/147 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedor

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:41 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:11:07AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:25 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live. >

Re: Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

Hi mufti, On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:02 AM J. Scheurich wrote: > | Review the package .. > | * Go through the MUST items listed in Review Guidelines > . > | * Go through the SHOULD items in Review Guidelines >

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

On 30. 07. 19 12:41, Hans de Goede wrote: Hmm: [hans@shalem master]$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires javapackages-filesystem | wc -l 3514 There are some doubles in here, due to multi-arch and updates, this includes things like: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless Ouch, I do not see these miss

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

Hi, On 30-07-19 12:29, Hans de Goede wrote: 2) Remove the obsolete jpackage-utils stuff, which no longer is part of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java From: cortado sdljava vecmath1.2 freecol bolzplatz2006 And keep them in the main Fedora repos Except that the guidelines say th

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

Hi, On 29-07-19 23:35, Alexander Scheel wrote: The reason I'm confused is because AFAIK last time jpackage-utils / javapackages-tools also was part of the set of packages causingproblems and javapackages-tools was picked up by the Stewardship SIG (or so I believe) so I'm surprised to see it go a

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Limit Scriptlet Usage of core packages

On 7/15/19 6:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:52 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:04 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 10. 07. 19 v 9:19 James Antill napsal(a): 2. adduser/group/etc.

Re: HEADS UP: /usr/bin/python is Python 3 in rawhide

On 7/30/19 12:18 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 7/15/19 7:09 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Finally some light at the end of the python-transition tunnel :) - Panu - If you see some light down the tunnel, it might be the train coming... That wouldn't be so bad, it'd still end the pain.

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

On 7/22/19 9:51 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: After preliminary discussions with CPU vendors, we propose AVX2 as the new baseline. AVX2 support was introduced into CPUs from 2013 to 2015. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#CPUs_with_AVX2 CPUs with AVX2]. This proposal see

Re: HEADS UP: /usr/bin/python is Python 3 in rawhide

> On 7/15/19 7:09 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Finally some light at the end of the python-transition tunnel :) > > - Panu - If you see some light down the tunnel, it might be the train coming... Cheers! --alec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@list

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:11:07AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:25 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live. > > You can see all the updates going through (or not) to rawhide in: > >

Re: HEADS UP: /usr/bin/python is Python 3 in rawhide

On 7/15/19 7:09 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Just a reminder that builds are currently running for python2 and python3 that change the meaning of /usr/bin/python from Python 2 to Python 3 in rawhide. Two weeks late to the party, but yay, thank you. Finally some light at the end of the python-tran

Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:25 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > I just wanted to let everyone know that this is now live. > You can see all the updates going through (or not) to rawhide in: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases/F31 > > Many many thanks to all the peop

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (75 to be retired)

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:14:38PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 7/27/19 11:53 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 26-07-19 18:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 7/26/19 4:25 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> 2) Make taking over the package a 1 click action > >> > >> There's work to get this happening... >