Hi All,
you probably have seen this.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/F6Z7KFVNHB26NXL2IROARWZQVQPT7J6O/
thanks.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:30 PM wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Co on
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:26 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > The Workstation technical specification document says in part:
>
> Where is the full technical specification document, so one can read it
> not in part, but in full?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:27 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:23 PM John Harris wrote:
> >
> > sshd was enabled by default back in F23, unless my install was completely
> > broken. I wouldn't remember that well, unfortunately, as I've been running
> > KDE
> > since the end
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/28/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190827git8474a17.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I released new version of Mock and mock-core-configs. For full release notes
> see:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.18
> I just submitted packages to Bodhi.
>
> I would like to point two
On 19-08-27 19:58:15, Chris Murphy wrote:
...
I definitely do not want to pester developers, or make their day to
day life difficult. If there's no satisfactory GUI right now to manage
it, it's difficult to even experiment with different policies. The
original firewalld proposal considered the
Google John, Google is your friend... ;-)
https://wiki.list.org/DEV/ModernArchiving
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:32 PM John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:27:49 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > Don't know what to tell you... it was a planned feature for Mailman 3,
> and
> > it is
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:27:49 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Don't know what to tell you... it was a planned feature for Mailman 3, and
> it is mentioned here:
> https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/51
What leads you to believe this was a planned feature?
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Don't know what to tell you... it was a planned feature for Mailman 3, and
it is mentioned here:
https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/issues/51
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:23 PM John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:20:57 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > Well, there is an open
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:23 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> sshd was enabled by default back in F23, unless my install was completely
> broken. I wouldn't remember that well, unfortunately, as I've been running KDE
> since the end of the F24 release cycle.
I don't think so.
* Fri Mar 13 2015 Dennis
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:20:57 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Well, there is an open ticket to do just that - apparently some people have
> a bigger imagination. ;-)
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:08 PM John Harris wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:43:54 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Well, there is an open ticket to do just that - apparently some people
> have a bigger imagination. ;-)
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:08 PM John Harris wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:43:54 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>> > > On
Well, there is an open ticket to do just that - apparently some people have
a bigger imagination. ;-)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:08 PM John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:43:54 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:02:36 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:43:54 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:02:36 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You could also just use NNTP, which wouldn't require you to have anything
> > in your mailbox. Then you can reply from the same
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:03:37 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Show what? Sorry, I don't know what your talking about. Have you ever
> used RSS? When you subscribe to a feed, you get the article... in this
> case it would be the email in HyperKitty. When you click on the title, it
> opens
Show what? Sorry, I don't know what your talking about. Have you ever
used RSS? When you subscribe to a feed, you get the article... in this
case it would be the email in HyperKitty. When you click on the title, it
opens up the sourced article on the web. In this case it would be the
email
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:58:11 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:36:58 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
> > How exactly do your RSS feedreaders handle threading?
>
> Don't you mean how HyperKitty will handle it? I won't be responding from my
> Feedreader, I would
Hello, I'm slee on FAS and interested in contributing to the Python SIG. I've
read over the wiki and some of the Python 2to3 guides as well as looked over
https://github.com/fedora-python. Please let me know if there's something in
particular I can start helping with as well as if there's some
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:36:58 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> How exactly do your RSS feedreaders handle threading?
Don't you mean how HyperKitty will handle it? I won't be responding from my
Feedreader, I would be reading the contents from the feed, and if I was
interested in
On 8/27/19 4:27 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 08. 19 13:06, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 20:55:18 -0400
>> Mohan Boddu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's an important day on the Fedora 31 schedule[1], with several
>>> significant cut-offs. First of all today is
>>> the Bodhi
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:02:36 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
>
> You could also just use NNTP, which wouldn't require you to have anything in
> your mailbox. Then you can reply from the same client, as well :)
Yeah, Kevin mentioned NNTP also... but as I mentioned to him I haven't
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:36:58 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Hey Kevin:
>
>
> > Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
> > If the plan is to replace mailing lists with something that cannot even
> > provide the same functionality, that is unreasonable and isn't going to
> > happen.
> >
> >
> > But
> On 8/27/19 11:00 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> Would your concerns be addressed if tjere was a gateway from this email
> list to Discord? Would something simple that just stores each email in a
> separate Discord item work, and if not, why?
>
> BTW, is there a gateway of this sort already
Hey Kevin:
> Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> If the plan is to replace mailing lists with something that cannot even
> provide the same functionality, that is unreasonable and isn't going to
> happen.
>
>
> But you are assuming that we actually WANT to migrate, which is NOT the
> case.
>
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I think that all the major milestones happen typically on Tuesday, so
> this must have been (unfortunate) typo IMO.
But the point is that this was corrected less than 24 hours before the
freeze kicks in. This is a completely unacceptably short notice.
It is already bad
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:15:52 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > That actually isn't clear at all. And I am the end user and sysadmin.
> > > I'm at home, I have my own AP, but none of the equipment is under my
> > > direct control, it's centrally managed by a company I don't even pay.
> > >
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 4:58:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:02 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > However, Fedora Workstation is an edition. Which means it has a
> > *policy-defined* target audience. That target audience is defined here:
> >
Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> If the requirement is that discourse completely replicate 100% the
> functionality of mailing lists, that is unreasonable and isn't going to
> happen.
If the plan is to replace mailing lists with something that cannot even
provide the same functionality, that is
> > That actually isn't clear at all. And I am the end user and sysadmin.
> > I'm at home, I have my own AP, but none of the equipment is under my
> > direct control, it's centrally managed by a company I don't even pay.
> > So, is it trustworthy? Maybe. Maybe not. I have no practical way of
> >
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 4:49:03 PM MST Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 8/27/2019 4:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:06 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> >
> >> mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:05:57 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:24 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:23:01 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Windows is enable by default with two "zones" or "policies" (I can't
> > > even tell
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:30 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:23:01 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > The firewall on macOS is disabled by default. Therefore I can't agree
> > with any assessment that Fedora Workstation is, on this point alone,
> > in some sort of vulnerable
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:02:36 PM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> People keep mentioning HyperKitty as an alternative to Discourse. While I
> believe Discourse has more functionality, one thing that would make
> HyperKitty a somewhat acceptable alternative would be the addition of RSS
> support.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:24 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:23:01 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Windows is enable by default with two "zones" or "policies" (I can't
> > even tell from their own UI what to call this), one for private
> > networks, and another for
People keep mentioning HyperKitty as an alternative to Discourse. While I
believe Discourse has more functionality, one thing that would make HyperKitty
a somewhat acceptable alternative would be the addition of RSS support. So I
started to investigate and found that several tickets were
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:02 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> However, Fedora Workstation is an edition. Which means it has a
> *policy-defined* target audience. That target audience is defined here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Workstation_PRD#Target_Audience
>
> Case 1:
On 8/27/2019 4:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:06 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris
wrote:
No, that is not how this works, at all. First, let's go ahead and
address the
MacOS has firewall disabled by default on every iteration.
Luya
On 2019-08-27 4:23 p.m., John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:23:01 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Tue, Aug
> 27, 2019 at 6:22 AM Neal Gompa
wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> The other major non-Linux operating systems do.
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:23:01 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> The firewall on macOS is disabled by default. Therefore I can't agree
> with any assessment that Fedora Workstation is, on this point alone,
> in some sort of vulnerable state outside that of macOS.
Talked to a coworker, who is a
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:23:01 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:22 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > The other major non-Linux operating systems do. Both Microsoft Windows
> > and Apple macOS ship with active firewalls by default.
>
>
> The firewall on macOS is
Hi guys,
I apologize that I mystified you a little in my prefious email when I wrote that
I resolved majority of problems. I looked at that closer today after 1.5w and
found that I have been near the start of all troubles. My memory just washed
that pain out.
So I spend some time around and
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:04:46 AM MST Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 10:14 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
>
> > On 8/27/19 10:03 AM, John Harris wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > Any new Wifi connection could be identified by their SSID, so it
> > could
> > still be secure by
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 9:59:23 AM MST David Kaufmann wrote:
> I'm not trying to recommend it, this is already done, e.g. for mdns,
> samba-client, or ssh. (To be fair that happens on os install, not
> necessarily on package install)
> I'm trying to list the problems with those options.
There
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:09:12 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 13:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 27.08.2019 18:14, Björn Persson wrote:
> >
> > > If it could come from anywhere, then we must assume that it's
> > > malicious.
> > > You
I'm not sure why this isn't clear, but the examples that I provided are far
from the only aspects, and I notice you're only addressing the ones that
require the user to manually run something.
Consider this. Our default ssh config, under your firewall config, would allow
any system on any
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:06 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris
> > wrote:
> > > No, that is not how this works, at all. First, let's go ahead and
> > > address the
> > > idea that "if the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:54 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 9:14:10 AM MST Björn Persson wrote:
> > John Harris wrote:
> > >On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:36:20 AM MST Björn Persson wrote:
> > >> Please elaborate. Where does the script come from, what exactly happens
> > >>
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 9:14:10 AM MST Björn Persson wrote:
> John Harris wrote:
> >On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:36:20 AM MST Björn Persson wrote:
> >> Please elaborate. Where does the script come from, what exactly happens
> >> by accident, and how would a packet filter stop it?
> >
> >It
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:14:45 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I would assume you would just use mailing list mode and address
> additional recipients. To receive an expert reply I would suggest you ask
> the question here:
>
> https://meta.discourse.org/c/support
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 8:02:31 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I never said they were. What I said was expecting and requiring Discourse
> to 100% replicate everything a mailing list does isn't going to happen and
> shouldn't be a requirement.
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:55 AM John Harris
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 9:15:16 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Yeah, I completely agree - but that wasn't my intention to try to
> convince. I would like additional topics that mirror those in the mailing
> lists setup on discourse. That way people can use whichever they want.
> The one that
I am about to build gap-pkg-guava 3.15 in Rawhide. This version
changes the license from "GPLv2 or GPLv3" to "GPLv2+", which makes no
practical difference at the moment.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list --
We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide only.
As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more.
Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should continue to work for
now. If not, let us know.
If you plan to keep a Python 2
We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide only.
As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more.
Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should continue to work for
now. If not, let us know.
If you plan to keep a Python 2
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
brandfbb opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Time-Duration`
that you are following:
``
Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Time-Duration/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:31 PM Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> * Pierre-Yves Chibon [26/08/2019 09:44] :
> >
> > Our recommended solution is to find someone that would maintain the mailman3
> > stack for us.
>
> Does this have to be mailman3 or can it be a different mailing list manager?
>
Mailman 3
* Pierre-Yves Chibon [26/08/2019 09:44] :
>
> Our recommended solution is to find someone that would maintain the mailman3
> stack for us.
Does this have to be mailman3 or can it be a different mailing list manager?
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list --
On 8/27/19 11:00 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Why is it when I say that I don't want to clutter up my email with
mail from mailing lists I'm told it's a misconfiguration. It's not a
misconfiguration. I don't want the forum email cluttering up my mail
- and I don't want to use an NNTP gateway, I
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2019-08-28 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744360
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744361
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 13:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 27.08.2019 18:14, Björn Persson wrote:
> > If it could come from anywhere, then we must assume that it's malicious.
> > You executed untrusted code. It's already past your firewall. Game over,
> > you're infected. You're closing
On 27.08.2019 18:14, Björn Persson wrote:
> If it could come from anywhere, then we must assume that it's malicious.
> You executed untrusted code. It's already past your firewall. Game over,
> you're infected. You're closing the stable door after the horse has
> bolted.
Any application can run
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:58:06AM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 4:37:24 AM MST David Kaufmann wrote:
>> Both option have their disadvantages - in the case of "maintainer opens
>> ports" the ports are open as soon as the package gets installed, and
>> software not
Yeah, I completely agree - but that wasn't my intention to try to
convince. I would like additional topics that mirror those in the mailing
lists setup on discourse. That way people can use whichever they want.
The one that people prefer will win. Simple as that.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:45
John Harris wrote:
>On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:36:20 AM MST Björn Persson wrote:
>> Please elaborate. Where does the script come from, what exactly happens
>> by accident, and how would a packet filter stop it?
>
>It could come from anywhere, that's not the point. A *firewall* would stop it
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:34:40PM -0300, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I personally don't like them. As the threads increase the discussion
> becomes hard to follow...
Unlike a non-threaded view of the same discussion, which becomes
completely impossible to follow (to say nothing about actual
For this who can't change their default zone in firewall after installing
Fedora Workstation completely block all ports may result in worse things, like
completely turn off firewall, because they can't run their online video games
for example and some one always advised them to do this.
We
I'm entirely fine with using discourse WHEN it has a functioning mailing list
mode.
I am not against discourse as such, I am against making changes that forces
everyone to consume the information in exactly the same way.
Ensure that mailing list mode works in a way that the ones who needs that
This conversation is pretty pointless. You are never going to convince
other people to like Discourse more than mailing lists, and they are never
going to convince you the other direction.
-Dan
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:35 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Here is an interesting discussion on
Here is an interesting discussion on "threaded discussions":
https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172
I personally don't like them. As the threads increase the discussion
becomes hard to follow...
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 11:01, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> Why is it when I say that I don't want to clutter up my email with mail from
> mailing lists I'm told it's a misconfiguration. It's not a misconfiguration.
> I don't want the forum email cluttering up my mail - and I don't want to use
>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:22 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> The other major non-Linux operating systems do. Both Microsoft Windows
> and Apple macOS ship with active firewalls by default.
The firewall on macOS is disabled by default. Therefore I can't agree
with any assessment that Fedora Workstation
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 12:00 -0300, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Why is it when I say that I don't want to clutter up my email with
> mail from mailing lists I'm told it's a misconfiguration. It's not a
> misconfiguration. I don't want the forum email cluttering up my mail
> - and I don't want to use
Iñaki Ucar píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 16:17 +0200:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 14:20, wrote:
> > The main competitor of Fedora Workstation is Ubuntu. Ubuntu ships
> > without a firewall enabled and nobody considers this a critical
> > vulnerability. Now: why is that...?
>
> 1. Ubuntu Server ships
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 10:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I released new version of Mock and mock-core-configs. For full release notes
> see:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.18
> I just submitted packages to Bodhi.
>
> I would like to point two
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 10:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I released new version of Mock and mock-core-configs. For full release notes
> see:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.18
> I just submitted packages to Bodhi.
>
> I would like to point two
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 10:14 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 8/27/19 10:03 AM, John Harris wrote:
> >
> Any new Wifi connection could be identified by their SSID, so it
> could
> still be secure by default and ask for that specific connection to
> be
> opened because you trust them. As I
I never said they were. What I said was expecting and requiring Discourse
to 100% replicate everything a mailing list does isn't going to happen and
shouldn't be a requirement.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:55 AM John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:29:28 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Why is it when I say that I don't want to clutter up my email with mail
from mailing lists I'm told it's a misconfiguration. It's not a
misconfiguration. I don't want the forum email cluttering up my mail - and
I don't want to use an NNTP gateway, I want to use Discourse. Why is that
so hard to
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-08-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Fedora Minimization Team
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9598/
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 15:17, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> Windows shows a pop-up.
To be fair, I've just checked and Windows 10 doesn't show a pop-up;
better than that: when you (enter the password and) hit "connect", it
asks there whether it's a private network and you want to share
resources, yes or
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:29:28 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I understand there isn't going to be 100% feature parity, but it should be
> good enough - and if it isn't we should be working with the Discourse
> people to improve it rather than just using it as an excuse to not moving
>
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50569
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:29:28 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Using mail, I have to access the archives to read the full thread.
This is just due to your configuration. You could easily either save the
mailing list to your mailbox, or use an NNTP gateway.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
On 8/26/19 3:33 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So, I see the following options for how to handle default streams in RHEL 8
Option 1: We disallow assigning default streams at all within EPEL 8.
This will protect us against a future
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:14:20 AM MST Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 8/27/19 10:03 AM, John Harris wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:35:08 AM MST Robert Marcano wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/27/19 8:18 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM, Iñaki
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:33 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> > that the package should
On 27 August 2019 16:29:28 CEST, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
>Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. My point is I don't like using
>email
>for forum discussions. The only reason I'm using it here is that I'm
>being
>forced to because "Development Discussions", "KDE Discussions" and
>"Packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764
--- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Based on the total lack of upstream activity, it may never be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 at 03:38, John Harris wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2019 4:54:09 AM MST Markus Larsson wrote:
> > It seems that the only thing in that link that has merit in regards to this
> > list is that discourse allow editing of messages that has been sent.
Which I'd consider a
Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. My point is I don't like using email
for forum discussions. The only reason I'm using it here is that I'm being
forced to because "Development Discussions", "KDE Discussions" and
"Packaging Discussions" aren't available on the Discourse Fedora instance.
As I
Hi,
I released new version of Mock and mock-core-configs. For full release notes
see:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.18
I just submitted packages to Bodhi.
I would like to point two things here:
1) It should fixes all those issues you reported in past
Hi,
I released new version of Mock and mock-core-configs. For full release notes
see:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.18
I just submitted packages to Bodhi.
I would like to point two things here:
1) It should fixes all those issues you reported in past
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 14:20, wrote:
>
> The main competitor of Fedora Workstation is Ubuntu. Ubuntu ships without a
> firewall enabled and nobody considers this a critical vulnerability. Now: why
> is that...?
1. Ubuntu Server ships without a firewall enabled. Do you think that's
a good
I would assume you would just use mailing list mode and address
additional recipients. To receive an expert reply I would suggest you ask
the question here:
https://meta.discourse.org/c/support
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:54 AM Julen Landa Alustiza <
jla...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I'm
On 8/27/19 10:03 AM, John Harris wrote:
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:35:08 AM MST Robert Marcano wrote:
On 8/27/19 8:18 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM, Iñaki Ucar
wrote:
There's no need to write "a new style of firewall". It would be as
easy as asking the
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 7:06:31 AM MST Ryan Walklin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris
>
>
>
> >
> > That port numbers are now "technical details" is fairly concerning, and I
> >
> > can't imagine why you think users shouldn't be able to configure their
> >
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
