Dear maintainers,
here is an updated list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time)
require Python 2 and have not yet requested a FESCo exception to do so.
Packages with open exception requests have been excluded for now to be able to
finish the conversation with FESCo.
If you were
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772789
Bug ID: 1772789
Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.006000
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Type-Tiny
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772787
Bug ID: 1772787
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-DKIM to 0.58
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-DKIM
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772785
Bug ID: 1772785
Summary: Upgrade perl-Devel-CheckLib to 1.14
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-CheckLib
Assignee: de...@fateyev.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772783
Bug ID: 1772783
Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-X509 to 0.52
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-X509
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771119
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762233
Johan Cwiklinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@x-tnd.be
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765091
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758970
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3020191114081842.bba63816 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758970
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765091
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-2920191114081842.fafb7136 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744785
--- Comment #4 from Johan Cwiklinski ---
Please test and give karma ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772558
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772725
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-8ecd333c9d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8ecd333c9d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772056
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772056
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Date-6.03-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764822
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764823
Bug 1764823 depends on bug 1764822, which changed state.
Bug 1764822 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Refcount
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764822
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761852
Bug 1761852 depends on bug 1762254, which changed state.
Bug 1762254 Summary: perl-MooX-Types-MooseLike for EL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762254
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762449
Bug 1762449 depends on bug 1765271, which changed state.
Bug 1765271 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Object-Accessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765271
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766727
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765091
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758970
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191114081842.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771707
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772395
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771702
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772356
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771715
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772056
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Date-6.03-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772056
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763473
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I really feel like we are approaching the finish line and shouldn’t give
> up just yet!
Unfortunately, the feeling that I get is that what looks like a finish line
to you is actually the edge of a deep cliff. ;-)
To explain my metaphore: I think the biggest trouble
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> You're assuming that parallel-install is a thing that everyone needs
> from every package on their system. Our research and surveys
> determined that this was not in fact the case for the overwhelming
> majority of real-world deployments. Most[1] deployments function
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Kevin Kofler
> wrote:
>> What about libgit2, was that not a default stream?
>
> It was not. It was a dependency of other modules.
So it looks like we really also (in addition to the proposed ban on default
streams) need a ban on
On 11/14/19 7:56 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
**What are the benefits of default modular streams over non-modular
packages?**
I think Adam Williamson tried to answer that in a message in the thread
"Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path" (link below) when he wrote:
"if you just don't
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:19 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Modular packages without defaults makes sense if they have
> > dependencies on a non-default stream. For example: ReviewBoard depends
> > on the Django:1.6 stream because of complicated upstream reasons. I
> >
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 18:20 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, November 14, 2019 6:07:57 PM MST John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> > There are a *lot* of useful, working Python 2 packages here. The
> > future of
> > Fedora will certainly be interesting.
>
> Looking through this list, it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772725
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of
perl-HTTP-Date-6.04-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39005420
On 15. 11. 19 2:18, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Modular packages without defaults makes sense if they have
dependencies on a non-default stream. For example: ReviewBoard depends
on the Django:1.6 stream because of complicated upstream reasons. I
have to choose between "modular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772725
Bug ID: 1772725
Summary: perl-HTTP-Date-6.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Date
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772725
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1636342
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1636342=edit
[patch] Update to 6.04 (#1772725)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Thursday, November 14, 2019 6:07:57 PM MST John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> There are a *lot* of useful, working Python 2 packages here. The future of
> Fedora will certainly be interesting.
Looking through this list, it's really a shame that so many good, working
packages are being removed
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Modular packages without defaults makes sense if they have
> dependencies on a non-default stream. For example: ReviewBoard depends
> on the Django:1.6 stream because of complicated upstream reasons. I
> have to choose between "modular without a default stream" or "not
>
On 15. 11. 19 2:11, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 02:02 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
python-inotify
python2-inotify (→ PY2)
python2-inotify-examples (→ PY2)
python-qt5
python2-qt5 (→ PY2)
python2-qt5-base (→ PY2)
python2-qt5-devel (→
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 02:02 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>python-inotify
> python2-inotify (→ PY2)
> python2-inotify-examples (→ PY2)
>
>python-qt5
> python2-qt5 (→ PY2)
> python2-qt5-base (→ PY2)
> python2-qt5-devel (→ python2-sip-devel → PY2)
>
There are a *lot* of useful, working Python 2 packages here. The future of
Fedora will certainly be interesting.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dear maintainers,
here is an updated list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time)
require Python 2 and have not yet requested a FESCo exception to do so.
Packages with open exception requests have been excluded for now to be able to
finish the conversation with FESCo.
If you were
> kernel-headers is related to the userspace API and is not tied to a
> particular kernel version.
> If the userspace API doesn't change there's no need to rebuild. Is there a
> problem you're
> seeing by not having an updated kernel-headers?
That does not be it works in all cases.
I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759801
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
perl-Gtk3 is a BuildRequired of debconf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Björn Persson wrote:
>Baxi wrote:
>> Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc
>> file. Verifying tarball with that signature says, Can't check signature: No
>> public key. I found his public key in key directory by searching his email
>> and added that key. Now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772356
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 13:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 11. 19 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > According to the policy for packages that fail to build from source:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
> >
> >
> > I plan to
On Thursday, 14 November 2019 at 23:02, Richard Shaw wrote:
> The package is building fine in mock but when I try to do a scratch build
> I'm getting the following error:
>
> fatal error: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
>
> It seems to be random too, on this attempt x86_64 actually
The package is building fine in mock but when I try to do a scratch build
I'm getting the following error:
fatal error: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
It seems to be random too, on this attempt x86_64 actually completed but
all other arches failed:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 11. 19 22:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:24 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >
> >> Easy is subjective. I don't consider this easy. I consider it seriously
> >> overcomplicated. The idea that going modular will
On 14. 11. 19 22:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Easy is subjective. I don't consider this easy. I consider it seriously
overcomplicated. The idea that going modular will somehow help with current
problems in modularity is exactly what happened
Thank you for the clarification, Pierre! I meant to do that yesterday, but
I got sidetracked. =)
The upgrade went well this morning and all jobs appear to be running
smoothly. We will make the change to fedora-messaging sometime next week,
most likely on either Monday or Tuesday. Once we've setup
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Easy is subjective. I don't consider this easy. I consider it seriously
> overcomplicated. The idea that going modular will somehow help with current
> problems in modularity is exactly what happened to eclipse.
No, what happened to Eclipse
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 19 19:39, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09. 10. 19 22:46, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modules_In_Non-Modular_Buildroot
> >>>
>
On 14. 11. 19 22:01, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 11. 19 21:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 11. 19 21:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Now, python3:3.7 vs. python3:3.8 might be a
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 9:32:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 14. 11. 19
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 9:15:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:04 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> > On
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 19 21:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14. 11. 19 21:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>> Now, python3:3.7 vs. python3:3.8 might be a more interesting question...
>
On 14. 11. 19 21:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 11. 19 21:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Now, python3:3.7 vs. python3:3.8 might be a more interesting question...
The way Python is designed, 3.7 and 3.8 is parallel installable by
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. I
don't have any urgent business, but also, I'm going to be off work that
day.
If you think we do need to have a meeting, you can volunteer to run it
- just send out an announcement like the one I normally send, and
follow
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 19 21:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Now, python3:3.7 vs. python3:3.8 might be a more interesting question...
>
> The way Python is designed, 3.7 and 3.8 is parallel installable by default.
>
> The only things that conflict are:
On 14. 11. 19 21:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Now, python3:3.7 vs. python3:3.8 might be a more interesting question...
The way Python is designed, 3.7 and 3.8 is parallel installable by default.
The only things that conflict are:
- package names, such as python3 or python3-pytest
-
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 06. 11. 19 8:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > M2.
> >
> > For traditional packages, it was consistent and easy to find package
> > dependencies in Fedora. For a proven packager, Fedora Packaging Committee
> > member
> > or generally for
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:04 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:45:22 AM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > You're assuming that parallel-install is a thing that everyone needs
> > from every package on their system.
>
> I'm not. However, if you're going to bring up
On 06. 11. 19 8:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
M2.
For traditional packages, it was consistent and easy to find package
dependencies in Fedora. For a proven packager, Fedora Packaging Committee member
or generally for anybody doing a System Wide Change, being able to run queries
like:
$ repoquery
On 14. 11. 19 20:58, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 11. 19 19:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 01:00:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On
Le jeudi 14 novembre 2019 à 13:45 -0500, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:33 PM John M. Harris Jr <
> joh...@splentity.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:15:15 AM MST Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what you're asking here. I thought it was
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 19 19:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 01:00:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
