Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
BTW my local servlet, which is on F33, lost automounting of lvm on mdraid home Makes systemd unit crazy, it forgets about user units, and refuses to acknowledge them even after /home is remounted manually. (this may or may not be the same thing, F32 & 33 have not diverged too far yet) -- Nicola

Re: Self Introduction: Dan Shoemaker

2020-03-06 Thread Daniel Shoemaker
Thanks:)) On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 9:11 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dan! > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 02:55, Daniel Shoemaker > wrote: > > > > Hi, my name is Dan Shoemaker. > > I have been using Fedora since Fedora Core 6 for both personal and > professional

Re: Self Introduction: Dan Shoemaker

2020-03-06 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hi Dan! On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 02:55, Daniel Shoemaker wrote: > > Hi, my name is Dan Shoemaker. > I have been using Fedora since Fedora Core 6 for both personal and > professional use. About five years ago I started developing bash scripts in > order to start automating tasks I was doing whil

Fedora-32-20200306.n.1 compose check report

2020-03-06 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 23/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200306.n.0): ID: 535275 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/535275 Old failures (same test

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200306.n.1 changes

2020-03-06 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200306.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200306.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Sadly not on Fedora 32 release. On 2020-03-06 10:13 a.m., Dan Book wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:03 PM Luya Tshimbalanga mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Hello team, f32-backgrounds is available for testing on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604ec

Re: Self Introduction: Bob Hepple

2020-03-06 Thread Bob Hepple
Hi Kevin, Pleased to meet you and thanks for the welcome! Yeah - 30,000 packages out there. More the merrier, of course. Bob On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 10:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 10:00:22AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote: > ...snip... > > > > That's enough from me, please don't

Re: Reducing broken dependencies in fedora (32) repositories

2020-03-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 03. 20 21:35, Fabio Valentini wrote: Report without testing repos enabled: https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md Report with testing repos enabled: https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32-testing.md The second most common

Re: Self Introduction: Bob Hepple

2020-03-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 10:00:22AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote: ...snip... > > That's enough from me, please don't hesitate to contact! Welcome Bob! I have too many packages already to take on more, but if you get stuck anywhere feel free to drop me a line and I can help out or point you to who mig

Re: [Test-Announce] Taskotron Going EOL on 2020-04-30

2020-03-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote: If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread. Hello Tim. I have 3 questions. 1) On what level of Fedora leadership was this decision made (and where can I read about it)? 2) Why are we removing something that arguably has a lo

Self Introduction: Bob Hepple

2020-03-06 Thread Bob Hepple
Hello. I'm a 2-years retired engineer with a tediously long resume - in short I've been packaging RPMs for big and small companies for, h, maybe 20 years. Unix since 1983, Linux since SLS days, kernel 0.9x, then RedHat/Fedora. I started with Algol, Cobol and Fortran but jumped into C as soon a

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-03-09) -- mind the time change in North America

2020-03-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-03-09 15:00 UTC' Mind that Daylight Saving/

Re: [Test-Announce] Taskotron Going EOL on 2020-04-30

2020-03-06 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tim Flink wrote: > In the short term, there is a Jenkins instance which is running > rpminspect. Rpminspect includes tests which are effectively the same as > rpmlint and rpmgrill which removes the need to run them. For packages with a .rpmlintrc file in the git rep

SCons help

2020-03-06 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Anyone here who is a bit familiar with the SCons build system? I'm trying to get mingw-nsis building and I'm fighting with scons refusing to process any "install" target, erroring out with messages like scons: *** Do not know how to make File target `install-utils' (/<...>/nsis-3.05-src/i

[Test-Announce] Taskotron Going EOL on 2020-04-30

2020-03-06 Thread Tim Flink
This is something that has been coming for quite a while now and while it was discussed among QA and Infra, there hasn't been enough communication with the rest of Fedora. For that, I apologize. Taskotron has been in maintenance-only mode for a couple of years now pending a replacement of some kin

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 19:03:01 CET Daniel Mach wrote: > Hello everyone, > I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning to > deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33 development for > early adopters and tool developers and we're hoping in getting a stable

Re: Reducing broken dependencies in fedora (32) repositories

2020-03-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:18 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 21:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to > > check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the > > fedora 32 (+testi

Re: Reducing broken dependencies in fedora (32) repositories

2020-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 21:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to > check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the > fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing > you need: >

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Aleksei Bavshin
> > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day > theme) using system settings thus tremendously saving space. > Does desktop-backgrounds-compat have a fix for that change? I remember that it had

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
> I can't find the ticket where I went nuts about this before any more, > but I've been saying it for a while :P https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435423 You can blame me, because I said I would work on fixing it, then never did. ;( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature _

Reducing broken dependencies in fedora (32) repositories

2020-03-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing you need: Report without testing repos enabled: https://pagure.io/fedora-health-ch

CPE Weekly: 2020-03-06

2020-03-06 Thread Aoife Moloney
--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly: 2020-03-06 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Wolfgang Ulbrich
As always backgrounds are updated too late! We are already in beta freeze, and desktop maintainers have to file out a freeze exception to update their gsettings keys to match new directory of wallpapers. Can you please update you package 2 weeks before beta freeze next time? Or change backgr

Unannounced SONAME bump: librealsense

2020-03-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, librealsense (maintainers in CC) bumped the SONAME of its shipped library with the latest update, and (at least some) dependent packages have not been rebuilt (including fawkes, maintainers in CC). Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lis

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 09:02 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > tv-wider folders in favour of a

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

2020-03-06 Thread Dakota Williams via devel
On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote: I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have prepared - let us not duplicate the work: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1 I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

2020-03-06 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote: > I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have > prepared - let us not duplicate the work: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1 > I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies and only encountered issues with >

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Dan Book
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:03 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > tv-wider folders in favour of a sin

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread jeandet
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 10:53 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > > >

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Hello team, > > > > > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca > > > > > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > > > tv-wide

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Peter Robinson
> > Hello team, > > > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca > > > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > > tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day > > the

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 09:02 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > tv-wider folders in favour of a

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote: > Hello, > > I did an upgrade last week, with: > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some > issues on my desktop. > On my laptop, from fc32 running: > sudo dnf

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:06 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 11:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: >> I have never understood a need for per-user copy of repo metadata. > > > I am remembering that attempts to do this with either yum or dnf did not go > over well with the co

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Przemek Klosowski via devel
On 3/5/20 2:08 PM, Daniel Mach wrote: I hope that someday we'll get microdnf close to 100% feature parity with DNF (Python plugins excluding obviously) Great plan, but when it happens, could it also get a simple IPC to talk to the optional Python plugins, and thus replace dnf entirely? What is

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread jeandet
Hello, I did an upgrade last week, with: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some issues on my desktop. On my laptop, from fc32 running: sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 11:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 06.03.2020 o 02:57, Neal Gompa pisze: > > The database has been synchronized since Fedora 24. However, the > > caches are not, and that *does* need to be fixed. > > And when user calls dnf let it use system cache by default... > > >

f32-backgrounds available for testing

2020-03-06 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team, f32-backgrounds is available for testing on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day theme) using system settings t

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 17:25:39 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 15:09:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >  Problem 3: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch > > 

Fedora-32-20200306.n.0 compose check report

2020-03-06 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 26/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200305.n.0): ID: 534831 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/534831 ID: 534872 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-d

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 06.03.2020 o 02:57, Neal Gompa pisze: > The database has been synchronized since Fedora 24. However, the > caches are not, and that *does* need to be fixed. And when user calls dnf let it use system cache by default... 17:38 (0s) hrw@puchatek:~$ time sudo dnf info nano [ fetching all rep

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Kalev Lember
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 15:09:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Problem 3: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch > > - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgra

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 15:09:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Problem 3: problem with installed package > python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch > - python3-fsleyes-props-1.6.7-1.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - nothing provides python3.8dist(flsey

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Artem Tim
Have many dupes which was already reported there, so selectively: Problem 4: problem with installed package minetest-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 - package minetest-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - minetest-5.1.0

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:07 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > Problem 7: package mp-3.1.0-26.20200215git71c21a5.fc32.x86_64 requires jacop, > but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package mp-3.1.0-23.20161124git1f39801.fc31.x86_64 > - package jacop-4.7-1.fc32.noarc

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200306.n.0 changes

2020-03-06 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200305.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200306.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:09:05PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Problem 4: package docker-2:1.13.1-68.git47e2230.fc30.x86_64 requires > atomic-registries >= 1.19.1-6, but none of the providers can be installed > - atomic-registries-1.22.1-28.gitb507039.fc30.x86_64 does not belong

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.12.beta.6.fc31.noarch - rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.12.beta.6.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (rubygem(treetop) >= 1.5.0 with rubygem(treetop) < 1.6) needed by ru

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 03. 20 14:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:25:15PM -0700, stan via devel wrote: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch - python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a dis

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:25:15PM -0700, stan via devel wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package > python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch > - python3-django-post_office-3.1.0-5.fc31.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - nothing provides python3

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 03. 20 13:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Yes, it's been retired [1]. Both should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/c/a539b99a0294220a7ec99317078128beb9a41e3b?branch=f32 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mh

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

2020-03-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 09:19:03AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > > against fedora-obsolete-packages i

Re: 2 Kernel related quick-docs need review

2020-03-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 22:08:35 +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 18:33 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Two more quick docs need specialist knowledge: > > > > - Building a custom kernel: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/210 > > - Kernel troubleshooting: > > https

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 21.11.37 WET Adam Williamson wrote: > I mean, it shouldn't be too hard to standardize on having them all work > both ways, even. I agree with Adam. What would be the drawback from this change? It is backwards compatible (an important issue in this context). And there are

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200306.0 compose check report

2020-03-06 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Paul Howarth
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 20:08:17 +0100 Daniel Mach wrote: > Dne 05. 03. 20 v 13:02 Marcin Juszkiewicz napsal(a): > > W dniu 04.03.2020 o 19:03, Daniel Mach pisze: > > Are there plans for picodnf then? Or cutting amount of > > libraries used by microdnf? > > I don't think we can drop more without

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

2020-03-06 Thread Richard Hughes
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 01:59, Neal Gompa wrote: > caches are not, and that *does* need to be fixed. The library > interface for DNF already has APIs for this, PackageKit doesn't use > them. I'm 100% okay with a pull request to fix this, as long as the same cache promises are met, i.e. PackageKit n