No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
I have what should be a very simple review here. Just a MinGW build of an
existing Fedora package. Anyone looking for something simple, or a quick
swap?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--Greg
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fed
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-04-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, and Fedora 32 is signed off, so
let's get together on Monday an
On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 16:41 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:59:16PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Doing things this way means that noggin can be much smaller and less
> > complex, it's just a interface, it doesn't need to be a complete
> > identity provider, and can depe
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 7:42 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:59:16PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Doing things this way means that noggin can be much smaller and less
> > complex, it's just a interface, it doesn't need to be a complete
> > identity provider, and can depen
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:59:16PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Doing things this way means that noggin can be much smaller and less
> complex, it's just a interface, it doesn't need to be a complete
> identity provider, and can depend on the already existing and well
> maintained IPA for that.
A
There really two questions here. Will/can Fedora automatically take
advantage of new instruction set architecture (ISA). And can my
project take advantage to new ISA.
The short answer is yes/maybe.
The longer answer is the mechanisms exist (built into the compilers
and runtime), but not all proj
Hello, guys, we (admins of Official Fedora Telegram channel[1], at the
behest of a member of the group) are hosting an AMA (date not set yet) on a
freshly minted telegram group @Fedoraama [2]. We hope to invite as many
Fedora contributors and people as possible, and have a lively 3/4 hours
discussi
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:44:42PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> The project name is NOT AAA. It is Noggin. The current FAS is actually
> Version 2. There was a FAS3 project for about 10 years that got put aside
> over and over again due to other priorities. Since the original FAS as a
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to
> > hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process.
> >
> > NSS (the crypto library us
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to
> hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process.
>
> NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox) historically supports 2
> database formats: SQLite and
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 13:03, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 08:54:42PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > Am 23.04.2020 um 19:00 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Development work has begun
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 08:54:42PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 23.04.2020 um 19:00 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Development work has begun on the API which will give applications access
> > > to the new
-- Forwarded message -
From: Paul Whalen
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:53 PM
Subject: Fedora 32 IoT RC Compose Available for testing
To: Fedora discussions about the Internet of Things <
i...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Good day all,
As discussed at our meeting yesterday, we have a
OLD: Fedora-32-20200423.n.1
NEW: Fedora-32-20200424.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 20/04/20 15:43 +0300, Vascom wrote:
Will Boost ever be updated on Fedora again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558278
Yes.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo
- Original Message -
> From: "Ty Young"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 8:54:29 PM
> Subject: Re: App updates for the new AAA solution
>
>
> On 4/23/20 12:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady w
17 matches
Mail list logo
