-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 08:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this.
> > > I
> > > hacked up a minimal reproducer with
Ben Cotton wrote:
> Swap is useful, except when it's slow. zram is a RAM drive that uses
> compression. Create a swap-on-zram during start-up. And no longer use
> swap partitions by default.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]]
> * Email: chrismur...@fedoraproject.org
I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 14:02 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> There is an update to opencv 4.3.0 in preparation for rawhide.
> This will be handled in a side tag along with the rebuild of the all
> dependencies.
> (fedpkg build --targ
Richard Shaw wrote:
> In troubleshooting this and working around it I'm using the F32 live
> installer, but I keep having to install gparted. The installer would be
> much more useful with it preinstalled.
The KDE Live image includes the KDE Partition Manager (KPM).
Kevin Kofler
_
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:10:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Another factor here is that DNF's behaviour when multiple different
>> available packages obsolete an installed package on update is 'greedy'.
>> If 'bar', 'moo' and 'meep' all obsolete 'foo' an
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this. I
>> hacked up a minimal reproducer with empty packages, and experimented a
>> bit, and the solution I was able to find that works is to have systemd-
>> udev Obso
Hi,
I'm taking cmatrix, thank you Raphael
Regards,
Didier.
Le 04/06/2020 à 20:02, Raphael Groner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> src.fedoraproject.org tells me I'm involved in exactly 100 packages at the
> moment. Therefore I decided to orphan at least a bunch of them or drop
> membership as co-maintain
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 16:30 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> ... The memory used is not preallocated. It's
> dynamically allocated and deallocated, on demand. ...
>
> The system will use RAM normally up until it's full, and then start
> paging out to swap-on-zram, same as a conventional swap-on-drive...
Le 04/06/2020 à 19:42, Carl George a écrit :
> I think it would be a better idea to move mod_php (the software) to a
> literal mod_php subpackage that is marked as deprecated [0].
Sorry, but I won't do that.
Never.
We are focusing since ever to provide proper configuration
working out of the box
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:07 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > small(?) problem with automated testing in bodhi:
> >
> >
> > Test Gating
> >
> > Failed to talk to Greenwave.
> >
> >
> > at least with:
> > https://bodhi.f
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:15:51AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 06. 20 6:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 6/3/20 8:23 PM, Igor Raits wrote:
> > > At least it did not break anything than %configure, so the world did
> > > not explode:)
> >
> > It hit at a very unfortunate time. With the
Am 04.06.20 um 18:52 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
>
> I don't think we actually have the technical capability to ship it in
> live media without also installing it by default on the installed system.
>
That won't be the worst consequence ;)
best regards,
Marius
_
Am 04.06.20 um 17:47 schrieb Felipe Borges:
>
> We already ship Disks (gnome-disks) in the live image. Doesn't it
> suffice for the type of task you need to perform?
>
>
:D Gparted does all the needed steps you would need to do manual with
gnome-disks . It way better for this kind of work.
Gnome-
Ok, I think I've had enough of going down this rabbit hole.
I'm going to move back to sd-boot and then blacklist grub2-common from
being reinstalled.
Thanks for the ideas everyone though!
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:24 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> > When it reboots, it skips the Fedora/GRUB loader and just shows Windows
> Boot Manager and "Firmware Setup".
>
> This is the behavior before making any modifications following
> installation?
>
> If so, then it's confuseled. I'd just use the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy
== Summary ==
Fedora has historically forced packages to build with GCC unless the
upstream project for the package only supported Clang/LLVM. This
change proposal replaces that policy with one where compiler selection
for Fedora follows the p
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM
== Summary ==
Swap is useful, except when it's slow. zram is a RAM drive that uses
compression. Create a swap-on-zram during start-up. And no longer use
swap partitions by default.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:chrismurphy| Chris Murphy]]
* Email:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:44 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:42 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:11 PM Chris Murphy
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:42 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:11 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Responding to the list instead of personal...
> >>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:11 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>> >
>> > Responding to the list instead of personal...
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:33 PM Marius Schwarz
>> > wrote:
>> >>
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:01:37 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Just following the conversation for information purposes, but I have
> > questions. If systemd-boot were to be used as boot service, could
> > the hibernate image be written to /boot/efi in place of the kernel
> > and initramfs, or in pa
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:11 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > Responding to the list instead of personal...
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:33 PM Marius Schwarz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 04.06.20 um 15:04 schrieb Richard Shaw:
> >> > Is there some
Hey All,
Fedora QA onboarding call will be on Wednesday 2020-06-10 at
1700-1900 UTC. We will focus on helping the new contributors to start
contributing right away. The meeting will be on Bluejeans, with a
'hackmd[1] for text notes. The agenda is already on the hackmd and is
designed to ensure t
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Responding to the list instead of personal...
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:33 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>>
>> Am 04.06.20 um 15:04 schrieb Richard Shaw:
>> > Is there someone that can help me convert my Fedora install from GRUB
>> > to system
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200603.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200604.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 133
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 76.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:58 AM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:13:59 -0600
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > Also, as it relates to authenticated encrypted hibernation images, the
> > upstream proposal is that since hibernation images can exist anywhere,
> > they should always be encry
Responding to the list instead of personal...
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:33 PM Marius Schwarz
wrote:
> Am 04.06.20 um 15:04 schrieb Richard Shaw:
> > Is there someone that can help me convert my Fedora install from GRUB
> > to systemd-boot and actually get it where kernel updates won't break it?
>
On 6/4/20 11:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 11:32 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 6/4/20 9:52 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> I don't think we actually have the technical capability to ship it
>>> in
>>> live media without also installing it by default on the installed
>>>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:53 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> I don't think we actually have the technical capability to ship it in
> live media without also installing it by default on the installed
> system.
>
> It currently has to run as root, which is not acceptable, so would
> require some w
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 11:32 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/4/20 9:52 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > I don't think we actually have the technical capability to ship it
> > in
> > live media without also installing it by default on the installed
> > system.
> >
> > It currently has to run
On 6/4/20 9:52 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I don't think we actually have the technical capability to ship it in
live media without also installing it by default on the installed system.
It currently has to run as root, which is not acceptable, so would
require some work to split out privil
Hi,
src.fedoraproject.org tells me I'm involved in exactly 100 packages at the
moment. Therefore I decided to orphan at least a bunch of them or drop
membership as co-maintainer, because I'm running out of time to actively
maintain all of them. Most of those packages didn't get updates in the r
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:13:59 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> Also, as it relates to authenticated encrypted hibernation images, the
> upstream proposal is that since hibernation images can exist anywhere,
> they should always be encrypted independently from swap, and therefore
> not depend on whether
I think it would be a better idea to move mod_php (the software) to a
literal mod_php subpackage that is marked as deprecated [0]. As the
deprecation policy states, this would allow the package to be kept around
for compatibility purposes prior to being outright removed at some point in
the future
On Thursday, 04 June 2020 at 17:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort of
> non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to boot anything but Windows from the
> ESP partition even though I can see it using efibootmgr.
Have you tried renaming your
I don't think we actually have the technical capability to ship it in
live media without also installing it by default on the installed
system.
It currently has to run as root, which is not acceptable, so would
require some work to split out privileged operations into a separate
backend pro
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 17:12 +0100, Ian McInerney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:48 PM Felipe Borges
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ian McInerney <
> > ian.s.mciner...@ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw > > wrote:
> >
> > >>
> >
> >
On 04.06.2020 17:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> In troubleshooting this and working around it I'm using the F32 live
> installer, but I keep having to install gparted. The installer would be
> much more useful with it preinstalled.
XFCE Live ships both GParted and Gnome Disks. You can use it.
--
Sinc
YES! PLEASE! I recently had an issue where gparted would have saved me
*hours* of head banging!
No one should have to use `fdisk`... *No one...* *NO ONE...*
Sincerely,
Lyes Saadi.
Le 04/06/2020 à 16:00, Richard Shaw a écrit :
I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some so
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:03 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 03.06.20 um 07:27 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> > You trust the encryption only to provide confidentiality of your data
> > from the attacker. Not as a means of detecting an attack on your data.
> > And also this isn't really just user data, th
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:48 PM Felipe Borges wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort
> of non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to
Reminder: election voting is open through 23:59 UTC on Thursday 11 June.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting in the Fedora 32 elections is now open. Go to the Elections app
> to cast[1] your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on Thursday 11 June.
> Don't forget to claim you
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:49 AM Felipe Borges wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort
> of non-standard UEFI install. It refuses t
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/11 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200603.0):
ID: 611386 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_greenboot
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/611386
Passed openQA tests: 10/1
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort of
>> non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to boot anything but Windows from the
>> ESP partition even though
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort of
> non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to boot anything but Windows from the
> ESP partition even though I can see it using efibootmgr.
>
> In troubleshooting this and w
I'm trying to install Fedora 32 to a MS Surface GO which has some sort of
non-standard UEFI install. It refuses to boot anything but Windows from the
ESP partition even though I can see it using efibootmgr.
In troubleshooting this and working around it I'm using the F32 live
installer, but I keep
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:15 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Due to the kernel options problem, which I'm not clear would be solved by
> removing grub/grubby, I decided to try to use systemd-boot to
> bootstrap GRUB.
>
> The only requirement I can find is that it needs to be on the same drive
> as the ES
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200604.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Due to the kernel options problem, which I'm not clear would be solved by
removing grub/grubby, I decided to try to use systemd-boot to
bootstrap GRUB.
The only requirement I can find is that it needs to be on the same drive as
the ESP partition, so I'm going to convert the 1GB NEW_ESP partition I
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:04:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is there someone that can help me convert my Fedora install from GRUB to
> systemd-boot and actually get it where kernel updates won't break it?
>
> The reason is that my MS Surface GO does not work with GRUB for some
> reason. Probab
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:04:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is there someone that can help me convert my Fedora install from GRUB to
> systemd-boot and actually get it where kernel updates won't break it?
You can try fedora-31-efi-systemd-x86_64.qcow2.xz from
https://www.kraxel.org/repos/image
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:47 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Can you assign me as main-admin please?
Done. Though I'm not sure if spending time on keeping a dead package
alive instead of pestering upstreams to drop the dependency makes
sense :)
Fabio
> ___
>
Can you assign me as main-admin please?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
One thing I forgot to mention, 1 & 2 are interrelated from what I can tell
including a problem I didn't mention.
Supposedly systemd-boot will attempt to find the root, /home, /var, etc
automatically and ignore /etc/fstab, but it's not working for me, the boot
hangs at gpt-auto-root.
>From my rese
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 11:05:39 PM EDT Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The clamd package ships a default service (clamd@scan) with the
> following configuration:
>
> /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/clamd.scan.conf:
> d /run/clamd.scan 0710 clamscan virusgroup
>
> %files -n clamd
> %ghost %dir %attr(0710,clamsca
Hi everybody,
I have just orphaned libdbusmenu. Some of my packages (particularly
some Pantheon components) previously depended on it (via libunity),
but both dependencies are now obsolete and I don't need the package
any longer.
I only picked up libdbusmenu because it was orphaned at the time
(b
Is there someone that can help me convert my Fedora install from GRUB to
systemd-boot and actually get it where kernel updates won't break it?
The reason is that my MS Surface GO does not work with GRUB for some
reason. Probably a non-standard UEFI implementation but I both found this
to be the ca
Dne 04. 06. 20 v 11:25 Igor Raits napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 10:56 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 03. 06. 20 v 19:29 Igor Raits napsal(a):
> >> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:42 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>> Other possibility is to modify DNF to not touch such packages.
> >>> Not
> >>> sure
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Thanks for all the work. :)
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 12:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> As previously discussed (by me ... nobody else responded) I have
> retired the boost-nowide package in rawhide.
>
> The boost-1.73.0 package now in rawhide provides boost-nowide as a
> subpackage, because the proj
As previously discussed (by me ... nobody else responded) I have
retired the boost-nowide package in rawhide.
The boost-1.73.0 package now in rawhide provides boost-nowide as a
subpackage, because the project is now part of the official Boost
release.
The packages that use boost-nowide have been
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:07 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> small(?) problem with automated testing in bodhi:
>
>
> Test Gating
>
> Failed to talk to Greenwave.
>
>
> at least with: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0e5ada32f1
Is it explicitly down due to the DC migration,
Hi,
small(?) problem with automated testing in bodhi:
*
Test Gating *
Failed to talk to Greenwave.
at least with:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0e5ada32f1
best regards,
Marius Schwarz
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
Am 03.06.20 um 07:27 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> You trust the encryption only to provide confidentiality of your data
> from the attacker. Not as a means of detecting an attack on your data.
> And also this isn't really just user data, the hibernation image is
> the kernel. If it's really compromised,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 10:56 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 03. 06. 20 v 19:29 Igor Raits napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:42 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Other possibility is to modify DNF to not touch such packages.
> > > Not
> > > sure
>
Dne 03. 06. 20 v 19:29 Igor Raits napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:42 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Other possibility is to modify DNF to not touch such packages. Not
> > sure
> > if that would be better. Or is there already some functionality which
> > would exclude the package from dnf tran
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:56:03PM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> Judging from the file name, mem_alloc.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so is a
> Python module. If that's so, you shouldn't link it using gcc, but use a
> Python import statement to load it.
> Is there some reason to link it using gcc?
On 04. 06. 20 6:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 6/3/20 8:23 PM, Igor Raits wrote:
At least it did not break anything than %configure, so the world did
not explode:)
It hit at a very unfortunate time. With the reduced data center power it is
taking a long time to hit the build root. Two hour
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 07:29:54PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:42 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Other possibility is to modify DNF to not touch such packages. Not
> > sure
> > if that would be better. Or is there already
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 610864 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/610864
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
71 matches
Mail list logo
