Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

2020-09-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 22:09:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: You're using net installer? The Live doesn't have user configuration in the installer. I did some live installs last week of rawhide and was able to create one user

Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

2020-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup > > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release > >

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-09-02 - 95% PASS

2020-09-01 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/09/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200901git01d9def.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-09-02 11:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:51 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr >> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-09-02 11:06, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:29:44 PM MST Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-09-02 10:21, John M. Harris Jr wrote: >> >>> I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is >>> this a F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch:

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:29:44 PM MST Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-09-02 10:21, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is > > this a F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch: > > > Is your system an upgrade of an earlier

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:51 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Michael, >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > > > > > Michael, > > > > > > The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf. > > > > > > You're wasting

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-09-02 10:21, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is this > a > F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch: Is your system an upgrade of an earlier version? In my case I have an F32 system which has been around for a few

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:19:15 AM MST Florian Weimer wrote: > * John M. Harris, Jr.: > > > > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge > > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS > > servers when none are configured? If no DNS

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:22:49 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:17 am, Nico Kadel-Garcia > wrote: > > > Hiding it inside yet another systemd structure without following the > > existing standards is, sadly, typical of systemd. It also puts at risk > > restricted

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr > wrote: > > > Michael, > > > > The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf. > > > You're wasting everyone's time with these low-effort spam posts. I don't see how this could

Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release > criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial >

[Bug 1874683] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.65 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683 Bug ID: 1874683 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.65 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Fixing an uninstallable package

2020-09-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 09. 20 23:32, Tony Asleson wrote: On 9/1/20 12:29 PM, Tony Asleson wrote: On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote: A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest  upstream release and exists in rawhide repo.

Re: Fixing an uninstallable package

2020-09-01 Thread Tony Asleson
On 9/1/20 12:29 PM, Tony Asleson wrote: > On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote: >>> A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest  upstream >>> release and exists in rawhide repo. >>> >>>

FedoraRespin-32-updates-20200901.0 compose check report

2020-09-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/37 (x86_64) ID: 652576 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652576 ID: 652595 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652595

Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

2020-09-01 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Hi, We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial setup experience. So let's add a new requirement for that. How about something like:

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-131bafc061 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[389-devel] please review: PR 51258 - remove hardcoded repl changelog filename string

2020-09-01 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51258 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-755b4f2613 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-755b4f2613 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-131bafc061 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-Load-Conditiona |perl-Module-Load-Conditiona

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2020 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2020

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

2020-09-01 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 31. 08. 20 v 23:35 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> Accepted blockers >> - >> 1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — POST >> abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core dumps

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

2020-09-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 09. 20 19:40, Robbie Harwood wrote: You may remove me from these packages or orphan them as you see fit. I don't plan on making any more contributions. Done. domcleal is maintainer of rpms/augeas domcleal is no longer maintaining rpms/augeas domcleal is no longer watching

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

2020-09-01 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 01/09/2020 18:29, kevin wrote: Just to make sure folks know, the retrace server being down is not this teams fault, it's ours (infrastructure). We planned to just have it down for a week or less when moving it to RDU, but it turned out that datacenter move was not at all what we hoped for

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Andreas Tunek
Den mån 31 aug. 2020 kl 22:40 skrev Michael Catanzaro : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:19 pm, Andreas Tunek > wrote: > > I can't get that command to do anything useful in either F32 or F33. > > You should see something like: > > $ resolvectl query example.com > example.com:

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

2020-09-01 Thread Robbie Harwood
"Dominic Cleal" writes: > Hi Robbie, > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, at 4:54 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Hi, in accordance with [1] this is a non-responsive maintainer check for >> Dominic Cleal. >> [..] >> So, does anyone know how to contact Dominic? > > You may remove me from these packages or orphan

Re: FYI Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.1 rebuild

2020-09-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:10:56AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:28 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back, > > something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and > > upstream released OCaml 4.11.1.

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

2020-09-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 10:29 -0700, kevin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:35:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > Accepted blockers > > > - > > > 1. libreport —

Re: Fixing an uninstallable package

2020-09-01 Thread Tony Asleson
On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote: >> A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest  upstream >> release and exists in rawhide repo. >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809 >> >> The package fails to install

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

2020-09-01 Thread kevin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:35:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 15:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > Accepted blockers > > - > > 1. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860616 — POST > > abrt-server errors when processing zstd

Re: F34 Change: Reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem (Self-Contained Change)

2020-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:22 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS >> >> == Summary == >> Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation media. >> >> == Owner ==

Re: Fixing an uninstallable package

2020-09-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote: A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream release and exists in rawhide repo. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809 The package fails to install because of newly added dependencies that were introduced

Re: FYI Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.1 rebuild

2020-09-01 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:28 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back, > something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and > upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. Details here: > >

Re: FYI Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.1 rebuild

2020-09-01 Thread Jeff Law
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 17:27 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back, > something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and > upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. Details here: > >

FYI Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.1 rebuild

2020-09-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
We did a Fedora 34 OCaml 4.11.0 rebuild a couple of weeks back, something like 170+ packages. Well, a compiler bug was found and upstream released OCaml 4.11.1. Details here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870368#c26 So I'm going to do a 4.11.1 build (into a side tag first).

Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

2020-09-01 Thread Robbie Harwood
Hi, in accordance with [1] this is a non-responsive maintainer check for Dominic Cleal. Non-responsive bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874569 Unactioned bugs (earliest is January 2018): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538845

Fedora-IoT-33-20200901.0 compose check report

2020-09-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200829.0): ID: 652533 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL:

Re: F34 Change: Reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem (Self-Contained Change)

2020-09-01 Thread Ben Cotton
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:23 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > Saving 142 MBs isn't going to make a huge difference in download times > (disclaimer: I don't know how is the internet connection speed in other > areas, I have not that fast connection of 200mbps down (slowest possible in > my

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20200901.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2020-09-01 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20200901.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:17 am, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Hiding it inside yet another systemd structure without following the existing standards is, sadly, typical of systemd. It also puts at risk restricted environments where providing no DNS is deliberately used to restrict outbound network

Fedora-33-20200901.n.0 compose check report

2020-09-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200831.n.0): ID: 652454 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652454 ID: 652468 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL:

Re: fedora-secondary boot image timeout

2020-09-01 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:25:03 -0500 Greg Hellings wrote: > I'm sorry, I don't know where the boot media information is kept, otherwise > I would raise my question there, instead. I'm trying to automate the > creation of ppc64le systems. x86_64 ISOs have a 30 second timeout on the > boot menu.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr wrote: Michael, The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf. You're wasting everyone's time with these low-effort spam posts. Lest anyone become confused, there is a big warning at the top of that file warning you that it is managed by authselect,

Fixing an uninstallable package

2020-09-01 Thread Tony Asleson
A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream release and exists in rawhide repo. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809 The package fails to install because of newly added dependencies that were introduced upstream. So previous working package was

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200901.n.0 changes

2020-09-01 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20200831.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200901.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 5 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 32.25 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

fedora-secondary boot image timeout

2020-09-01 Thread Greg Hellings
I'm sorry, I don't know where the boot media information is kept, otherwise I would raise my question there, instead. I'm trying to automate the creation of ppc64le systems. x86_64 ISOs have a 30 second timeout on the boot menu. ppc64le machines have a 5 second timeout. With the vagaries of system

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-09-02)

2020-09-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-09-02 14:00 UTC' Links to all issues

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* Roberto Ragusa: > Standard DNS has a hierarchical structure with roots and delegation. > The idea of asking somebody to do DNS resolution for you comes from > the widespread tendency to centralize everything (i.e. inability to > understand how the Internet was originally designed). DNS

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* John M. Harris, Jr.: > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS > servers when none are configured? If no DNS servers are configured, there > should be no DNS servers in use. Acutally, the

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:34 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 2020-09-01 08:52, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Monday, August 31, 2020 8:32:49 AM MST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > >> On 31.08.2020 17:07, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > >> > >>> ship a release with "fallback" to Google and

[Bug 1874459] New: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99031 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874459 Bug ID: 1874459 Summary: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99031 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-Whois-Raw Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: F34 Change: Reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem (Self-Contained Change)

2020-09-01 Thread Kamil Paral
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:55 AM Michel Alexandre Salim < mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote: > On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS > > > > == Summary == > > Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the

[Bug 1874449] New: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.010005

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874449 Bug ID: 1874449 Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.010005 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Type-Tiny Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1873854] perl-Test-Dependencies-0.28 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873854 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Dependencies-0.24 |perl-Test-Dependencies-0.28

[Bug 1874173] perl-PDF-API2-2.038 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874173 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: python-versioneer: no version information in github archives?

2020-09-01 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 21:46:19 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I remember it was but it was extremely hard to use anything but the sdist > when hacking on nb2plots. See: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nb2plots/pull-request/2 > > Overall, versioneer behaves very badly when you try to

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200901.0 compose check report

2020-09-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-131bafc061 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-131bafc061 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-131bafc061 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31 Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-131bafc061 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1870878] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200820 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1871053] perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.74 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from

Re: [golang packaging] how to get files from source tarball

2020-09-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le 2020-08-31 18:08, Zdenek Dohnal a écrit : Hi, I'm trying to package ipp-usb project (https://github.com/OpenPrinting/ipp-usb) which is written in Go. I generated spec file via go2rpm, but several files from source tarball which supposed to be packaged is not packaged e.g. systemd unit file

CPE Weekly: 2020-09-01

2020-09-01 Thread Aoife Moloney
Hi everyone, Welcome to September! Below are the most recent Community Platform Engineering project updates, and if you want to know more about our team, see our wiki page here for more information on who our team is: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/ Here are some upcoming IRC

Re: F34 Change: Reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem (Self-Contained Change)

2020-09-01 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS > > == Summary == > Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation media. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:bkhomuts|Bohdan Khomutskyi]] > * Email: bkhom...@redhat.com

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200901.0 compose check report

2020-09-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200831.0): ID: 652173 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Fwd: Re: CppunitTest_sw_htmlexport failing due to zlib variation?

2020-09-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 31/08/2020 23:05, Adenilson Cavalcanti wrote: Joining the discussion, since I worked on the original optimization patches and I'm one of the maintainers of Chromium's zlib. Just seconding what Jeremy mentioned, it is possible to generate a valid DEFLATE stream wrapped with GZIP format that

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 2020-09-01 08:52, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Monday, August 31, 2020 8:32:49 AM MST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 31.08.2020 17:07, John M. Harris Jr wrote: ship a release with "fallback" to Google and Cloudflare DNS? Big Brother will be happy. :-) Sure, those two companies will

[Bug 1874173] perl-PDF-API2-2.038 is available

2020-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874173 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-09-01 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:47:14PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > when I want to do a review with: fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b > 1873407 > i get this error message: > > warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: > vdr(abi)(x86-64) = %{vdr_apiversion} It

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, August 31, 2020 8:32:49 AM MST Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 31.08.2020 17:07, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > ship a release with "fallback" to Google and Cloudflare DNS? > > > Big Brother will be happy. :-) Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, August 31, 2020 1:39:37 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:19 pm, Andreas Tunek > wrote: > > > I can't get that command to do anything useful in either F32 or F33. > > > You should see something like: > > $ resolvectl query example.com > example.com:

Re: Switching package to fragmented default configuration

2020-09-01 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, August 31, 2020 11:24:57 PM MST David Tardon wrote: > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > On Saturday, August 29, 2020 3:36:33 PM MST Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > https://blog.verbum.org/2020/08/22/immutable-%E2%86%92-reprovisionable-a > > > nti->

Re: Switching package to fragmented default configuration

2020-09-01 Thread David Tardon
On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Saturday, August 29, 2020 3:36:33 PM MST Colin Walters wrote: > > https://blog.verbum.org/2020/08/22/immutable-%E2%86%92-reprovisionable-anti-> > > hysteresis/ > > touches on some of the benefits of "fragmented" configs. > > Perhaps