No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201117.0):
ID: 724374 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello,
orphaning java-comment-preprocessor due to missing dependencies for the new
version (cannot be rebased) and no other package dependents on it.
Regards,
Ondrej
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898610
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 9/177 (x86_64), 14/115 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201116.n.0):
ID: 724111 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
munin-2.0.65-1.el6
Details about builds:
munin-2.0.65-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fdb79d0ad2)
Network-wide resource monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2aa68c5f5e
tor-0.4.3.7-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-317c124dc0
rpki-client-6.8p1-1.el8
4
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d69636a383
tor-0.3.5.12-1.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0fe15b3c39
rpki-client-6.8p1-1.el7
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895633
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-perlfaq-5.20201107-1.f |perl-perlfaq-5.20201107-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.44 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.44
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895633
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-perlfaq-5.20201107-1.f |perl-perlfaq-5.20201107-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Dear maintainers,
I've built updates bringing Rubberband to version 1.9.0:
F33: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-378d450ffb
F32: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a3ca9c95c2
EPEL8:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3d4e57454b
It's a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895672
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895633
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890589
Bug 1890589 depends on bug 1893497, which changed state.
Bug 1893497 Summary: RFE - build a perl-Module-Install-ExtraTests package for
EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893497
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893497
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201116.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201117.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 83
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 18.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201114.0):
ID: 723973 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/723973
ID: 723989 Test: aarch64
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> That's why all user-space "OOM killers" must have the following
> lines in their .service files:
>
> DynamicUser=true
> AmbientCapabilities=CAP_KILL CAP_IPC_LOCK
> ProtectSystem=strict
> ProtectHome=true
>
> I think
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:12:53PM -0500, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> I'm a Linux admin at a university supporting around 100+ EL7/8 and Ubuntu
> machines. I've been using Linux as a hobby since around 1994 and
> professionally since 1999. My first Linux experience was installing
> Slackware from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898691
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Tk-GraphViz-1.07-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55761353
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898691
Bug ID: 1898691
Summary: perl-Tk-GraphViz-1.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Tk-GraphViz
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
> On 17.11.2020 18:45, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Just because it's easier not to follow expected process doesn't mean
>> they shouldn't.
>
> Patching packages by proven packages is a completely normal workflow.
Something being normal doesn't mean it's good.
>>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-11-18 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 12:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == Contingency Plan ==
> > >
> > > Modules will provide the functional version of MariaDB 10.4, available to
> > >
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:43 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 17.11.2020 09:46, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> > I think this is the root cause and a real problem (I complained about
> > this myself several few times on this list).
>
> Yes, ofc. I've submitted
Good feedback. I'll adjust the document to integrate your suggestions.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 17.11.2020 09:46, Felix Schwarz wrote:
I think this is the root cause and a real problem (I complained about
this myself several few times on this list).
Yes, ofc. I've submitted multiple PRs. Some of them haven't been merged.
Later I got these packages through the Non-responsive
On 17.11.2020 18:45, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Just because it's easier not to follow expected process doesn't mean
they shouldn't.
Patching packages by proven packages is a completely normal workflow.
If waiting too long is a problem, set a timeout - send a PR, if it's not
merged in two weeks
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:52:57PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> > I completely agree. This is one of the reasons I switched away from
>> > ubuntu years ago (with its 4 (?) tiers of support + repos for its
>> > packages ...).
>> I agree, Fedora did the
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
> On 16.11.2020 13:35, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>> The only point (though important imho) I want to make is that
>> provenpackagers should not "circumvent" the package maintainer by
>> default - even though I can imagine it is way faster just to push your
>>
On 11/17/20 4:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
dig @9.9.9.9 +nsid heise.de
FWIW, a neat way to look at differences like that is
watch -d dig @9.9.9.9 +nsid heise.de
I use it often for looking at hotplugs (watch -d lsusb) etc.
___
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
We do have FDK-AAC-Free imported for a while. Some functionality was
patched out due to various concerns:
*https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fdk-aac-free
* https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~wtay/fdk-aac/log/?h=fedora
вт, 17 нояб. 2020 г. в 16:42, Igor Bukanov :
>
> AAC-Main audio encoder/decoder
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:42 AM Igor Bukanov wrote:
>
> AAC-Main audio encoder/decoder profile was specified as a part of
> https://www.iso.org/standard/25035.html standard. That was published in
> December 1999. Does it mean that software implementing it like ffmpeg in its
> default
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898610
Bug ID: 1898610
Summary: perl-Convert-Binary-C-0.80 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Convert-Binary-C
Keywords: FutureFeature,
AAC-Main audio encoder/decoder profile was specified as a part of
https://www.iso.org/standard/25035.html standard. That was published in
December 1999. Does it mean that software implementing it like ffmpeg in its
default configuration can be included into Fedora starting from January 2021?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11/16/20 11:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > The logic behind the NEEDINFO stuff may need to be updated... The
> subject says
> > it all and it's quite annoying.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897496
> >
On 17.11.2020 13:26, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
User d9k on IRC found the culprit. It is low-memory-monitor. The latest
commit [1] for it tries to not mess with the value with 1 is set, but it
should not mess with it ever.
That's why all user-space "OOM killers" must have the following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898583
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-1.3.4-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55749188
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898583
Bug ID: 1898583
Summary: perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-1.3.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898583
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1730160
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1730160=edit
[patch] Update to 1.3.4 (#1898583)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hi Mattia,
The package has now been reviewed and approved:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894726
I haven't had any offers for sponsorship on the mailing list so I'll try
posting an issue on "packager-sponsors."
Cheers,
Isaac
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:25 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> > stable *manually*.
>
> Uh, last I checked, normal updates need only +1 (and that's a good thing,
> many updates don't even get +1 in a
On 11/17/20 8:26 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
User d9k on IRC found the culprit. It is low-memory-monitor. The latest
commit [1] for it tries to not mess with the value with 1 is set, but it
should not mess with it ever.
The same documentation on that commit references [2] where it says:
Note
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:10:02PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> > Two times in a week I have killed all processes trying to use Alt+i. Ts
> > is to easy to press the Alt and the PrtScr at the same, starting that
> > way the SysRq i command.
> >
> > So
On 11/16/20 8:25 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
I am using a ThinkPad with one of these keyboards where the PrtScr key
is between the right Alt and Ctrl, an awful position.
Two times in a week I have killed all processes trying to use Alt+i. Ts
is to easy to press the Alt and the PrtScr at the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> stable *manually*.
Uh, last I checked, normal updates need only +1 (and that's a good thing,
many updates don't even get +1 in a reasonable time frame, let alone +2).
Only critical path packages and
Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> Two times in a week I have killed all processes trying to use Alt+i. Ts
> is to easy to press the Alt and the PrtScr at the same, starting that
> way the SysRq i command.
>
> So before staring to write a kernel patch to add an option where the
> SysRq is only
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:35:41PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/16/20 4:25 PM, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> >My Fedora 33 kernel.sysrq value is 80, the default at
> >/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf say that it should be 16.
> >
> >Created /etc/sysctl.d/99-local.conf with
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64), 7/7 (aarch64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Juan Orti Alcaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|amavisd-new |amavis
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851872
Juan Orti Alcaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.orti.alca...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890417
Juan Orti Alcaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|amavisd-new |amavis
--
You are receiving
On So, 15.11.20 18:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> > Because a lot of networks use routing tricks to send traffic to particular
> > DNS server IP addresses. They may round robin, traffic route, or other
> > methods to send you to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201116.0):
ID: 723519 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On So, 15.11.20 15:36, Samuel Sieb (sam...@sieb.net) wrote:
> On 11/15/20 7:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Implementing this does not come without drawbacks though: right now
> > resolved tries hard to use the same server if at all possible, since
> > we want to use newer DNS features if
On Mo, 16.11.20 21:48, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote:
> But it does not have to learn everything about a server, because it
> switched the active one. If it has to, try to find way to store server
> instance features per server IP, not per link.
We do exactly this. But we also have a
Am 16.11.20 um 14:03 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
Most of casual packagers simply ignore all pull requests and don't even check
their mail. It is much more easier to fix the package manually than waiting 2-3
weeks for a response.
I think this is the root cause and a real problem (I
63 matches
Mail list logo
