No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201118.0):
ID: 725030 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
See title. I will only be updating in F33+.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code
I've packaged up the firmware for the new AMD GPUs in linux-firmware
in updates-testing. I doubt anyone will have access to one of these
cards for a few weeks anyways, but if somene does end up with one,
please see how it fairs.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ff2b09cd0a
Dave.
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> You are kinda right, yet you are not.
> The minimum for *autokarma* is +1 for normal updates, +2 for critpath
> updates. But the message "This update can be pushed to stable if the
> maintainer wishes" does not refer to autokarma (update getting pushed
> automatically by bo
Voting in the Fedora 33 elections is now open. Go to the Elections app
to cast[1] your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on Thursday 3
December. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you cast
your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections app
and on the
Community Blog[2].
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 3:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> HUmf. I also tried without much luck... (and I unpushed it as part of
> that, sorry for that).
No problem. Thank you for trying.
> Can you file a releng ticket on this and we can at the very least dig
> into the database and fix it that way.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:05:04AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:56 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> > Yeah, that's another Bodhi webUI bug (fixed in devel, but not yet
> > available in prod).
> >
> > To update the builds list of a side-tag update you can use the CLI:
On 18/11/2020 13:28, Luca BRUNO wrote:
A dynamic default is being tackled directly at kernel level.
There is a currently in-progress patch on linux-fsdevel for this, first
revision is at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-fsdevel/patch/20201026204418.23197-1-long...@redhat.com/.
For furth
On ke, 18 marras 2020, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Is there a way to use systemd resolved in a container?
I figured this out yesterday -- at least in Rawhide, dbus-daemon is now
replaced by dbus-broker which is not active by default.
So you need
systemc
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:21 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Matthew Miller writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:52:57PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >> > I completely agree. This is one of the reasons I switched away from
> >> > ubuntu years ago (with its 4 (?) tiers of support + repo
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 16:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 11/16/20 11:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > The logic behind the NEEDINFO stuff may need to be updated... The
>> subject says
>> > it all and it's quite annoying.
>> >
>> > https://bug
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 20:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11/18/20 8:10 PM, Alexander Scheel wrote:
> > Also, JFTR, I believe I only took over internal maintenance of
> > python-nss; I am not a maintainer of Fedora python-nss. There is only
> > one maintainer:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.o
On 18/11/2020 19:18, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:54:51 +0100
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Given the problems with the 64k page size, is it feasible to offer the
>> 4k page size as default for ppc64 users in Fedora 34?
>
> personally I haven't encountered any pr
Hello,
The new libcap-ng has been built into rawhide.
Cheers,
-Steve
On Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:45:41 PM EST Steve Grubb wrote:
> A new version of libcap-ng is going to be released next week. Normally this
> isn't newsworthy, nor is this a soname version bump. But it is important
> to let
On 11/18/20 8:10 PM, Alexander Scheel wrote:
Also, JFTR, I believe I only took over internal maintenance of
python-nss; I am not a maintainer of Fedora python-nss. There is only
one maintainer:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nss
My motivation here is to either get this package orpha
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 6:37 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> >> Is there a way to use systemd resolved in a container?
> >
> > I figured this out yesterday -- at least in Rawhide, dbus-daemon is now
> > replaced by dbus-broker which is not active by def
Also, JFTR, I believe I only took over internal maintenance of
python-nss; I am not a maintainer of Fedora python-nss. There is only
one maintainer:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nss
- Alex
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 2:09 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>
> Note that I have no access to up
Note that I have no access to upstream python-nss. The entire upstream
community was John Dennis. The last upstream commit was in 2018 and
the commit prior was in 2017. With his departure, there's no viable
path forward for maintaining python-nss upstream; perhaps someone from
Mozilla will take it
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Does anybody has an alternate contact info for jden...@redhat.com / FAS
> jdennis?
>
> Bugzilla says the account is invalid:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892248
Alex Scheel replaced John as the maintainer.
rob
___
On 18/11/2020 19:17, David Howells wrote:
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> Given the problems with the 64k page size, is it feasible to offer the
>> 4k page size as default for ppc64 users in Fedora 34?
>
> It doesn't necessarily help you if you're, say, upgrading from F33 and are
> already using 6
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:54:51 +0100
Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given the problems with the 64k page size, is it feasible to offer the
> 4k page size as default for ppc64 users in Fedora 34?
personally I haven't encountered any problems related to 64k pages on
my Talos II system, th
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Given the problems with the 64k page size, is it feasible to offer the
> 4k page size as default for ppc64 users in Fedora 34?
It doesn't necessarily help you if you're, say, upgrading from F33 and are
already using 64K pagesize. Your formatted filesystems may already dep
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:56 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> Yeah, that's another Bodhi webUI bug (fixed in devel, but not yet
> available in prod).
>
> To update the builds list of a side-tag update you can use the CLI:
> `bodhi updates edit --from-tag= `
>
> Try that...
$ bodhi updates edit
Il 18/11/20 18:43, Jerry James ha scritto:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:34 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> Ah, I'm just sharing my wisdom. It has no use when I keep it to myself :)
> I need a little more wisdom. This is the update I created from the side tag:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updat
Hi all,
Given the problems with the 64k page size, is it feasible to offer the
4k page size as default for ppc64 users in Fedora 34?
Vikings.net in Germany is about to start selling[1] workstations based
on the Talos II and Blackbird. The people who buy those have a big
commitment to free soft
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/16 (x86_64), 8/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201116.0):
ID: 724941 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/724941
ID: 724948 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:34 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Ah, I'm just sharing my wisdom. It has no use when I keep it to myself :)
I need a little more wisdom. This is the update I created from the side tag:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f16abf2fb5/
A tester found a probl
Hi all,
Does anybody have any comments for those who manage to get one of these
cards?
Phoronix published[1] various comments about it, it appears to need:
Kernel 5.9 or 5.10
Firmware binary code that isn't yet present in linux-firmware.git
- is there any way to extract that binary from anothe
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Is there a way to use systemd resolved in a container?
I figured this out yesterday -- at least in Rawhide, dbus-daemon is now
replaced by dbus-broker which is not active by default.
So you need
systemctl enable --now dbus-broker
Without it even
[I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider
distribution.]
As mentioned, we're looking at moving the Fedora Council's main chat to
Matrix. And as part of that, we're considering a hosted Element server --
which obviously could go quite beyond just #fedora-council. Neal sugge
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I hope you enjoyed the F33 release party this weekend! Getting back to
> the GitLab topic mail threads, this weeks topic from the GitLab AMA
> session on September 10th is on Message Bus. As always, here are some
> links to t
Hello.
Does anybody has an alternate contact info for jden...@redhat.com / FAS jdennis?
Bugzilla says the account is invalid:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892248
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-11-18/fesco.2020-11-18-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-11-18/fesco.2020-11-18-15.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-11-18/fesco.2020-11-18-15.00.lo
Dne 16. 11. 20 v 11:04 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> I should not propose this, because I agree with the points bellow. But if we
> should have it, then:
>
> ~~~
>
> Provides: upstream-spec(https://some.url/to/upstream/package.spec)
>
> ~~~
>
> would be machine readable and it would give use some i
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 14/177 (x86_64), 19/115 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201117.n.0):
ID: 724671 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso deskt
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:49 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 09:13:54 +, Gargoyle wrote:
> > I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop
> > system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192
> > limit for fs.inotify.max_user_wa
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:13:54 +
Gargoyle wrote:
> I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main
> desktop system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the
> initial 8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably
> causing the most side effects.
>
> If not,
On ke, 18 marras 2020, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hi,
I realized my fedora-based containers have an /etc/resolv.conf which
claims it is managed by resolved, and nsswitch.conf has "resolve" in
hosts. However, doing something like
# systemd-resolve --status
results to:
sd_bus_open_system: No
Hi,
I realized my fedora-based containers have an /etc/resolv.conf which
claims it is managed by resolved, and nsswitch.conf has "resolve" in
hosts. However, doing something like
# systemd-resolve --status
results to:
sd_bus_open_system: No such file or directory
Trying to start dbus claims tha
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64), 7/7 (aarch64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
st 18. 11. 2020 v 10:16 odesílatel Gargoyle napsal:
> I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop
> system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial
> 8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most
> side effects. As a devel
Am 18.11.20 um 10:13 schrieb Gargoyle:
4903 4620 /data/Applications/java/jdk-15/bin/java
-Djdk.home=/data/Applications/java/jdk-15 -classpath
/data/Applications/netbeans
The first action that comes in mind is to reduce the amount of notifiers
On 18/11/2020 09:58, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11/18/20 10:13 AM, Gargoyle wrote:
If not, then perhaps the default should be significantly increased
with the aim of removing the problem for new users with modern
desktop/laptop machines which probably have 4GB+ RAM. I've not
rebooted my machine
On 11/18/20 10:13 AM, Gargoyle wrote:
I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop system.
Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192 limit for
fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most side effects. As a
developer, I pretty much
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 09:13:54 +, Gargoyle wrote:
> I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop
> system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192
> limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most side
> effects. As a develo
I update the Wiki page to state that the current contingency plan is a
revert of the change by bumping 'mariadb' package epoch.
I also added a note about the dependent packages that need rebuild.
That is a single package (amarok); I tested the rebuild in COPR and
discussed it with the 'amarok' pack
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201117.0):
ID: 724441 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop
system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial
8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most
side effects. As a developer, I pretty much have netbeans open all day
and am fore
48 matches
Mail list logo
