No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 748899 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748899
ID: 748906 Test: aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911305
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911353
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-CSS-Minifier-XS-0.10
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/12/31/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.9-1.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
As in subject.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
As in subject. Due to other dependency changes, this will only be in Rawhide.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hey Matthew!
> This is super, super cool!
We are so glad to know that you liked the idea. :)
> One suggestion I have is to start in the simpler "Unity" mode rather than
> the "Cellular" one by default. Also, in the Cellular one, provide a button
> or something to add a new cell rather than
On 12/29/20 11:26 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
More likely what you're really confused about is something that a lot
of people are not aware of. Wayland is a protocol, not a program. I
believe there's a library, but the final implementation is done in
each window manager. The X11 "emulation" is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.45 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.45
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it
depends on sip and PyQt5-sip:
https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt
Now, this is where things get a bit odd:
- the current sip (4.19.24) does not have
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it
depends on sip and PyQt5-sip:
https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt
Now, this is where things get a bit odd:
- the current sip (4.19.24)
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dddcb59a9c
phpldapadmin-1.2.5-1.el7
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-83291355d7
openssl11-1.1.1g-2.el7
12
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
awstats-7.8-2.el8
libaesgm-20090429-24.el8
partclone-0.3.17-1.el8
zchunk-1.1.9-1.el8
Details about builds:
awstats-7.8-2.el8
Hi all,
Neal and I are looking at getting ButterManager packaged, and it
depends on sip and PyQt5-sip:
https://github.com/egara/buttermanager/blob/master/requirements.txt
Now, this is where things get a bit odd:
- the current sip (4.19.24) does not have autogenerated Python
provides, but sip5
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 5:01 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 9:22 PM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
>
> > > * We wouldn't have a "consistent configuration" across everybody,
> > > really, because anyone who
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 9:22 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > * We wouldn't have a "consistent configuration" across everybody,
> > really, because anyone who upgraded from pre-F34 would still have the
> > old config; every
Hullo!
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 21:12 +, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> ngompa and I were talking to the upstream maintainer of the
> ButterManager backup tool about packaging for Fedora. Upstream is
> ready
> to collaborate on a RPM spec file if there is an interest in
> packaging
> for
On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 13:02 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 19. 12. 20 v 21:24 Luya Tshimbalanga napsal(a):
> > Just an idea of a form application that generates the spec file for
> > newcomers as an example.
>
> Something like
> https://xsuchy.github.io/rpm-spec-wizard/
> ?
>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 5:48 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 30.12.20 um 22:14 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:
> > - a separate partition for storing GRUB config, no matter what
> > architecture, is probably the ideal solution
> Not always. In VMs you would reduce the amount of partitions to ease
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include
> -ffat-lto-objects in their build flags. This proposal would remove
> -ffat-lto-objects from the
Am 30.12.20 um 22:14 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:
- a separate partition for storing GRUB config, no matter what
architecture, is probably the ideal solution
Not always. In VMs you would reduce the amount of partitions to ease up
things. The main problem with Vms is, that you have LTS based
Howdy,
On Sat, 2020-12-26 at 20:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> For me the most time consuming is monkey updates packages like kde
> apps
> , which every month or two we have a new release ( kde app 20.04.1
> 20.04.2 20.08.0 , 20.12.00 etc )
>
> I did some scripts to automate my builds ,
Am 30.12.20 um 14:07 schrieb Mattia Verga via devel:
Il 30/12/20 10:14, Marius Schwarz ha scritto:
Don't you need to recompile stuff first to have an effect? :)
I've just pushed a rebuild for qt5-qtwebengine, let's see if that's enough.
I had a chromium 85 build running instead of the
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:49 PM Germano Massullo
wrote:
> I am one of the keepassxc maintainers. Bugreport
>
> "Missing dependency: qt5-qtsvg libQt5Svg.so.5"
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911210
>
> made me wonder about the following thing:
>
> I just installed a basic Fedora
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:46 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> I see this documented here:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/#_consequences_of_a_package_being_deprecated
>
> but not in the packaging guideline:
>
I am one of the keepassxc maintainers. Bugreport
"Missing dependency: qt5-qtsvg libQt5Svg.so.5"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911210
made me wonder about the following thing:
I just installed a basic Fedora server to do a test concerning keepassxc
libs. Keepassxc spec file [1]
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 16:28 -0500, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 14:53, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsTransparentCompression
> >
> > == How to test ==
> >
> > Existing systems can be converted to use compression manually with
>
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 14:53 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_xemacs
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Deprecate the xemacs, xemacs-packages-base, xemacs-packages-extra,
> and
> neXtaw packages, all of which have dead upstreams.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 14:53, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsTransparentCompression
>
> == Summary ==
>
> On variants using btrfs as the default filesystem, enable transparent
> compression using zstd. Compression saves space and can significantly
> increase the
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:08:31PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> That's why I went with the conservative approach of only do this for
> new installs, to prevent breaking users configuration (or even worse,
> their booting). Maybe a middle ground could be to provide a tool for
> users to
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 12:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 14:53 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> >
> > This change will not only simplify and make less confusing the GRUB
> > configuration but also allow the following improvements:
> >
> > * To have
Hi all!
ngompa and I were talking to the upstream maintainer of the
ButterManager backup tool about packaging for Fedora. Upstream is ready
to collaborate on a RPM spec file if there is an interest in packaging
for Fedora:
https://twitter.com/eloygara/status/1344006727583330305
Hello Adam,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 9:22 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
[snip]
> > == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> >
> > The changes will only be for new installations, existing systems will
> > not be impacted and will continue using the grub.cfg and grubenv
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 14:53 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
>
> This change will not only simplify and make less confusing the GRUB
> configuration but also allow the following improvements:
>
> * To have a consistent configuration across all the architectures using GRUB.
> *
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_xemacs
== Summary ==
Deprecate the xemacs, xemacs-packages-base, xemacs-packages-extra, and
neXtaw packages, all of which have dead upstreams.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jjames|Jerry James]]
* Email: loganje...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/xfce-4.16
== Summary ==
Xfce 4.16 is a stable release with proven components, provide features
to both new and power users alike. This change proposal is submitted
to sync fedora packages with the latest upstream release.
== Owners ==
* Name:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnifyGrubConfig
== Summary ==
This change makes the GRUB configuration files layout to be consistent
across all the supported architectures. Currently EFI is a special
case since the GRUB configuration file and environment variables block
are stored in the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements
== Summary ==
Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include
-ffat-lto-objects in their build flags. This proposal would remove
-ffat-lto-objects from the default LTO flags and only use it for
packages that actually need
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.24
== Summary ==
IBus will use the mmap(2) feature to show emoji and Unicode tables in
order to reduce the physical memory usage.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Fujiwara|Takao Fujiwara]]
* Email: fujiwara [at] redhat [dot] com
== Detailed Description
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsTransparentCompression
== Summary ==
On variants using btrfs as the default filesystem, enable transparent
compression using zstd. Compression saves space and can significantly
increase the lifespan of flash-based media by reducing write
amplification.
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 00:31 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
> "Wim Taymans" writes:
> > * propose permanent switch for f35
> > - it gets at least full cycle of testing (f34 + part of f33)
> > * re-evaluate situation for f35 beta freeze to make a default
> > switch.
> >
> > Although a bit slower than
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 01:18:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 05:09:08PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:02:13PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > delta rpms safe so much time in form of bandwidth on the client side.
> > > Well,
On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 18:54 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:45 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > I wrote in the update that in my opinion the solution for this bug
> > can't involve expecting add-ons to suddenly get re-signed en masse, or
> > users to change their
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 7:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> You can add more than one. Just put them in a file and upload all of
> them for 'ssh key' one key per line. There's a limit based on
> applications getting the ssh keys, but you can upload multiple keys
> fine.
Oh, ok! Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 04:01:26PM +0500, Nasir Hussain wrote:
> We would love to hear your feedback. Please keep in mind that this is a
> testing deployment and is currently running on an underpowered cloud
> instance. We are proposing it as a candidate GSoC project for it to be
> deployed,
Hey Benson,
Thank you so much for taking some time out to check the public preview.
> Nice. Consider using a
> temporary domain name for this. For example from
> Freenom.
We are considering a domain name for it and would surely keep you posted,
should we obtain one.
> Are there any similar
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/180 (x86_64), 7/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
I maintain packages that used to BR the packages in $SUBJECT, but with
their latest versions no longer do. I'm orphaning these packages. If
you need them, please pick them up.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911158
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-8.69 is|perl-Mojolicious-8.70 is
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
ID: 748758 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748758
ID: 748767 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201230.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 102
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.93 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 05:09:08PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:02:13PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > delta rpms safe so much time in form of bandwidth on the client side.
> > Well, it's tradeoffs. They save bandwith and download time on one side,
> > but use lots of
Il 30/12/20 10:14, Marius Schwarz ha scritto:
>
> Don't you need to recompile stuff first to have an effect? :)
>
>
I've just pushed a rebuild for qt5-qtwebengine, let's see if that's enough.
Mattia
___
devel mailing list --
On 29/12/2020 01:41, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I was trying it with Bose QC35 headphones.
It was 0.3.18 and as I say it was showing up as a device but
with no node that I could route audio to.
Maybe an extra step is required for that Bose QC35. Try to forget that device
and reconnect.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:26:15PM +0100, p...@barkhof.uni-bremen.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there hope that this selinux update will make system-container usable in
> Fedora again?
>
> ( see e.g.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900869
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 748428 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748428
ID: 748435 Test: aarch64
Am 30.12.20 um 04:53 schrieb Jeff Law:
To be clear (and I know you know this, but your readers might not know),
QtWebEngine (qt5-qtwebengine) and Chromium (chromium) are distinct packages
(none of them depends on each other), each containing a slightly different
copy of essentially the same
58 matches
Mail list logo
