On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:42 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order.
>
> As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, I'm
> surprised this wasn't already implemented.
>
It is implemented.
Hello!
Turned out that some basic functionality no longer wiorks even with
python3.9 available in Fedora 33 (see rhbz #1896975). I am going to
upgrade it up to 3.9.1 version where compatibility with Python3 is
ensured. I will upgrade Rawhide, F-34 branches.
Despite of a version gap should be a
Hello!
I am going to upgrade libgsasl for Fedora 35. The last version
available in Fedora 1.8.1 is more than 9 years old so it's time to
move up. It should be backwards-compatible upgrade but still it's a 9
years gap so beware.
Potentially affected packages:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 12/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210401.n.0):
ID: 841407 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841407
ID: 841413 Test:
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/189 (x86_64), 16/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order.
As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, I'm
surprised this wasn't already implemented.
Since the folder is created on the fly in the user's home directory this
can't be easily fixed through
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210331.0):
ID: 841673 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/841673
ID: 841677
OLD: Fedora-34-20210401.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210403.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 110
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.44 MiB
Size of dropped packages:160.37 KiB
On 2021-04-01 at 15:54 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:13 AM Łukasz Posadowski
> wrote:
> > Thank You. It should be really helpful with VM migrations, by
> > tracking 3rd party packages and leftover dependencies. I'm
> > trying to
> > run it on RHEL 8 and it is working on
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210401.0):
ID: 840824 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello everyone,
I am Shreya Gupta, a sophomore at IIT Patna, India. I am having a keen interest
in Open Source. I am highly interested in your Outreachy project 'Improve
Fedora QA dashboard'. I am primarily interested in Web development. I have the
knowledge and prior experience of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210401.0):
ID: 840821 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/840821
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7
Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a):
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >Unless OpenShift and RKE recently changed so that containers can run
> > >as root by default (as of
13 matches
Mail list logo
