[Bug 1949332] New: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949332 Bug ID: 1949332 Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.09 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA Keywords:

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

- Original Message - > From: "Matthew Miller" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: developer-por...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:01:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:08:29PM -0400,

[Bug 1949293] New: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.476 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949293 Bug ID: 1949293 Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.476 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Verilog-Perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1949283] New: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949283 Bug ID: 1949283 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.62 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker Keywords:

[Bug 1949270] Please build perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949270 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1758483] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758483 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heinrich.mis...@univie.ac.a

[Bug 1949278] perl-Net-Stomp-0.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949278 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1949278] New: perl-Net-Stomp-0.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949278 Bug ID: 1949278 Summary: perl-Net-Stomp-0.61 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-Stomp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1949270] Please build perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949270 --- Comment #1 from Heinrich Mislik --- Sorry, perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 is already available. Bug can be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 1949270] New: Please build perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949270 Bug ID: 1949270 Summary: Please build perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 for epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Assignee:

[Bug 1949266] New: Please build perl-Email-Valid for epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949266 Bug ID: 1949266 Summary: Please build perl-Email-Valid for epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Email-Valid Assignee: spo...@gmail.com

Re: Podman and docker compose

Brent Baude, not on this list responds: Sergio, Unfortunately Podman can not do network links. It is something we cannot support in the API nor docker-compose. Perhaps the use of the link in the yaml could be reworked not need it? On 4/12/21 01:15, Sergio Belkin wrote: El dom, 11 abr

Re: Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version

The problem is that compiz-reloaded (0.88) has several adjustments for MATE desktop, eg. gtk-theme reloading during theme switching, desktop shortcuts, special theme page in ccsm, etc. I don't want lost this for users of mate-compiz spin. For privat reasons i don't have the time in the next 2

Re: Self Introduction: Roman Dementiev

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:21:42AM +, Dementiev, Roman wrote: > I am the main developer of PCM - Processor Counter Monitor > (https://github.com/opcm/pcm) and would be happy to become a Fedora > maintainer for PCM. Just submitted PCM srpm for review here: >

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:08:29PM -0400, Pavel Valena wrote: > long overdue release has landed to: https://developer.fedoraproject.org/ > Please check the updated website! Nice! > Detailed info is available on our ML [*]. I admit I didn't even know there was a mailing list! Would it be worth

Re: Outreachy 2021 applicant

Hello Lukas Brabec, I was in quarantine for 12 days because I was tested COVID positive. Due to which I was unable to contribute to this project. But from now I want to contribute to the project consistently. I like to solve the issue which shows on console tab in developers tool.

Re: Outreachy 2021 applicant

Hello Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1949183] New: perl-PDF-API2-2.040 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949183 Bug ID: 1949183 Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.040 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDF-API2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora-34-20210413.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 15/189 (x86_64), 12/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210412.n.0): ID: 854738 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL:

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-04-14 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:41 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > I have Fedora accounts that I setup many years ago and honestly don't > > recall if I was ever setup to be a packager for Fedora. If there is a way > > to verify if I am setup as a packager I'd be happy to check, but most > > likely I am

Fedora-IoT-34-20210413.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210409.1): ID: 855174 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/855174 ID: 855182 Test: aarch64

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:31:42 -0400 Trey Dockendorf wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > > Hi Trey, > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:15:08 - > > treyd...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora > > and appear

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021, at 8:44 PM, Matthew Almond via devel wrote: > > I think we should be careful to de-couple these two things. Just > because $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is likely to affect a lot of binaries is not > proof that all binaries will. Agreed; it'd be interesting to gather some data here,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d0a9c2bf03 chromium-89.0.4389.90-3.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-857a9f7853 openssl11-1.1.1g-3.el7 10

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Dan Horák wrote: > Hi Trey, > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:15:08 - > treyd...@gmail.com wrote: > > > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora > and appear to be receiving updates. I found a wiki page that said to > contact the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

在 2021-04-13星期二的 14:15 +，treyd...@gmail.com写道： > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora > and appear to be receiving updates.  I found a wiki page that said to > contact the maintainers via email but I was unable to find the emails > associated with the

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b26bce013a chromium-89.0.4389.90-3.el8 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58127424cd perl-Net-Netmask-2.0001-1.el8 10

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

Hi Trey, On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:15:08 - treyd...@gmail.com wrote: > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora and > appear to be receiving updates. I found a wiki page that said to contact the > maintainers via email but I was unable to find the emails

[EPEL-devel] Getting conman into EPEL8

It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora and appear to be receiving updates. I found a wiki page that said to contact the maintainers via email but I was unable to find the emails associated with the maintainers so I opened a bugzilla but wasn't sure if I did this

Re: Podman and docker compose

On 4/11/21 22:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: Have you tried podman-compose? It's in the Fedora repos. Podman APIV2 is supposed to support docker-compose, if this fails an Issue or Bugzilla should be opened.  Podman-compose is an alternative open source project for compose, which we are not

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

* Neal Gompa: > As I said previously[1], I think doing autoconf upgrades would be less > painful if we always did that. > > [1]: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZG3SNLFS7BSXQ3JFJDOWUS3WWGTGLR2/ I think that's not actually true: If we do not

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20210413.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20210413.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Fedora-Rawhide-20210413.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 11/189 (x86_64), 9/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210412.n.0): ID: 854504 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 08:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM Florian Weimer > wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora

Re: Podman and docker compose

Brent PTAL On 4/11/21 20:34, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm playing around with podman and docker compose, so I've read the post at https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/podman-docker-compose . The example with Gitea does not work, this the

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210413.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210412.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210413.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 24 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 128.09 KiB Size of dropped packages:3.05 MiB

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:24:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > > "autoreconf -i" during builds that

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:57:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mo, 12.04.21 16:14, David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > So I want to push back on the idea that a single package can be > > >

[CANCELLED] Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-13)

We would have the meeting today, but there are no tickets on the agenda. The meeting is cancelled. The next meeting is scheduled a week from now. I'll chair the next meeting. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

* Richard W. M. Jones: > Hijacking this thread originally about > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? I would prefer to do it because it aligns with Fedora's goal

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:57:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 12.04.21 16:14, David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > So I want to push back on the idea that a single package can be > > associated with a coredump, or be the one responsible for the crash: > > any or all of

[Bug 1949065] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949065 Bug ID: 1949065 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.17 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 11:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Hijacking this thread originally about > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? > 1) "autoreconf -i" is not

Self Introduction: Roman Dementiev

Hi, I am the main developer of PCM - Processor Counter Monitor (https://github.com/opcm/pcm) and would be happy to become a Fedora maintainer for PCM. Just submitted PCM srpm for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949058 Thanks, Roman Intel Deutschland GmbH Registered

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On 4/13/21 12:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Hijacking this thread originally about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? IMO, it's naive wishful thinking, applicable

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210413.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210412.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210413.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:7 Upgraded packages: 100 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.67 MiB Size of dropped packages

What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

Hijacking this thread originally about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? In Debian it's been recommended for a long time: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf I maintain

Heads up: vala 0.52.x with soname bump coming to rawhide

I'm about to start building vala 0.52.2 in rawhide that has a soname bump compared to vala 0.48.x that we have in rawhide right now. I'll take care of the rebuilds in a side tag and merge when everything is sorted out. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210413.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210412.0): ID: 854397 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Virtualization Test Day 2021-04-13

Hey All, We are going to test all forms of virtualization possible in Fedora. The test day [0] will focus on testing Fedora or your favorite distro inside a bare-metal implementation of Fedora running Boxes, KVM, VirtualBox, and whatever you have. The general features of installing the OS and

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210413.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210412.0): ID: 854226 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Need feedback on ocaml-atd review request

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:02:30PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > This is a single project that ends up generating several related OPAM > packages. The automatic requires/provides seem to identify the modules > it provides correctly, so... do I need to split the packaging to > individual

Re: Need feedback on ocaml-atd review request

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:02:30PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On a related note, the packaging guidelines is rather out of date: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/OCaml/ Yes, they desperately need to be updated. At the moment it's better to look at existing

[Bug 1948957] New: perl-Crypt-CBC-3.02 requires perl-Math-Int128 which does not exist on 32-bit platforms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948957 Bug ID: 1948957 Summary: perl-Crypt-CBC-3.02 requires perl-Math-Int128 which does not exist on 32-bit platforms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: i686

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-04-13 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/04/13/report-389-ds-base-2.0.4-20210413gite542902ae.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to