Mamoru TASAKA kirjoitti 29.4.2021 klo 8.55:
Greg Hellings wrote on 2021/04/29 14:46:
So I built my package a few times for F34 in the Rawhide cycle (e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-90a4c6ba11)
It was rebuilt successfully by releng for F34 (e.g.
https://koji.fedoraprojec
Workstation live & Server dvd ISOs work
Everything boot does not work
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:03 AM wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210428.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you h
Greg Hellings wrote on 2021/04/29 14:46:
So I built my package a few times for F34 in the Rawhide cycle (e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-90a4c6ba11)
It was rebuilt successfully by releng for F34 (e.g.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1695213)
Howeve
So I built my package a few times for F34 in the Rawhide cycle (e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-90a4c6ba11)
It was rebuilt successfully by releng for F34 (e.g.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1695213)
However, it does not appear in F34 in this versio
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210428.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
在 2021-04-28星期三的 13:40 -0700，Kevin Fenzi写道：
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:12:15PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> > If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/
> > with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso
> >
> > Mount it and see Fedora-Legal-README.txt in the image. The
Hi,
After my recent upgrade to Fedora 34, I was disappointed to find out
that one of my favorite puzzle games Fish Fillets NG has been retired.
So, I decided I should make an effort to get it back from the dead and
maintain it.
The relevant packages are:
fillets-ng
fillets-ng-data
The f
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 18:43 -0400, przemek klosowski wrote:
> On 4/28/21 6:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 17:42 -0400, przemek klosowski via devel wrote:
> > > Trying to update F33 -> F34 on a development laptop with about 4700
> > > packages. I think it started as F30 a
On 4/28/21 6:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 17:42 -0400, przemek klosowski via devel wrote:
Trying to update F33 -> F34 on a development laptop with about 4700
packages. I think it started as F30 and did three Fedora system upgrades.
...
I am getting four errors:
...
The f
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 17:42 -0400, przemek klosowski via devel wrote:
> Trying to update F33 -> F34 on a development laptop with about 4700
> packages. I think it started as F30 and did three Fedora system upgrades.
>
> I did the standard
>
> dnf upgrade --refresh
>
> dnf system-upgrade
Trying to update F33 -> F34 on a development laptop with about 4700
packages. I think it started as F30 and did three Fedora system upgrades.
I did the standard
dnf upgrade --refresh
dnf system-upgrade --releasever=34 download
I am getting four errors:
Problem 1: package gtatool-gdal
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:12:15PM +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> If you download a Fedora 34 live iso at https://getfedora.org/
> with filename: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso
>
> Mount it and see Fedora-Legal-README.txt in the image. There are many
> Fedora 31 things show up, should this fi
Swift (swift-lang) absolutely, positively requires clang. I tried
building Swift with gcc and that is a lost weekend I’d love to get
back.
Ron
On 23 Apr 2021, at 14:46, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Gary Buhrmaster:
For C/C++ projects:
If the upstream has no stated preference for the compiler,
Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 35.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
> to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
> big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
> maintain several othe
Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I
maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick
one or the other.
I
Now through 12 May, you may nominate candidates for the four open
seats on the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations
FESCo is currently selecting the qu
Hi Mikolaj,
On 4/27/21 4:49 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:26 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> I will orphan all Java packages I am the main admin of, later today.
>
> I've adopted the majority of Java packages that were orphaned by Fabio,
> primarily those that are related
Hi Fabio,
On 4/26/21 9:19 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary
> maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of
> them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and
> don't get me
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> They *could*, but most likely not in a fashion that is flexible enough.
> Essentially, shipping presets in the package itself is equivalent to
> statically enabling or disabling the services contained in that
> package (*). Presets are useful to provide differen
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:07:14PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 21:14, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I originally raised this as a question to FESCo[1], but I was asked to
> > bring it up on the Fedora Devel list. My apologies for taking so long
> > to
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:19:31AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > For a specific example: suppose that a particular VM host provides its
> > guest tools only as a closed-source binary that they ship. Do we
> > permit them to request the inclusion of their servic
Hi,
welcome to Fedora. I would like to invite you to join the Fedora Server Working
Group. Ansible is supposed to be one of the focal points in the near future to
simplify various maintenance and installation tasks.
We meet every Wednesday, 17:00 UTC #fedora-meeting or server mailing list.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210427.0):
ID: 871631 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 28.04.2021 09:46, Anatoly Vildemanov wrote:
What's else shall I do for join to packages group and ucx group for create ucx
package
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> For a specific example: suppose that a particular VM host provides its
> guest tools only as a closed-source binary that they ship. Do we
> permit them to request the inclusion of their service in presets under
> the reasoning that it would enhance users' performance on t
Rex Dieter wrote:
> kde plasma on f34 uses systemd user session and
> systemd-xdg-autostart-generator
Why was this changed? ksmserver worked fine all this time. Why can we not
let systemd handle, well, *system* services (as its name says) and leave
user services to the desktop environment?
On 4/27/21 11:37 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 4/27/21 10:28 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 04. 21 8:41, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
We see a problem with this construct:
Source0: %{pypi_source}
It used to work:
$ rpmspec -P python-asyncpg.spec | g
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, but IMO Maven in Fedora should be built the
> same way as upstream builds it, that is with Maven. That minimizes the
> possibility of deviating from upstream and introducing unnoticed bugs.
> Instead a custom project was created that is used to b
Hi,
I following this instructions, create fedora/Bugzilla account , join to all
important mail list , and will support ucx package
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ucx
What's else shall I do for join to packages group and ucx group for create ucx
package
Thanks
-Original Message-
F
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 20:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary
> maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of
> them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and
> don't get m
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210427.0):
ID: 871505 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
32 matches
Mail list logo
