On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:53:13PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:42:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Serge Guelton wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:42:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Serge Guelton wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0.
> >
> > In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Serge Guelton wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0.
>
> In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following packages needs
> a rebuild:
>
> annobin-0:9.65
> bindgen-0:0.57.0
>
On Saturday, 15 May 2021 at 02:16, William Garber wrote:
> the panel-date-format gnome shell extension is very useful and
> popular. why not make it a standard rpm available in the repository
> please?
Someone has to commit to being the maintainer:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packa
Hello.
License changed from "GPLv3+" to "GPLv3+ and MIT and ASL 2.0".
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fed
On 5/14/21 2:50 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 20:09 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
We discussed that in the Fedora Server Edition Working Group and
opted to leave it as is for the Server installation iso. A lot of
servers are running in a protected environment. And there are
situatio
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210512.1):
ID: 887763 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/887763
Soft failed openQA tests:
On Friday, 14 May 2021 14:25:26 EEST PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 5/14/21 2:05 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
> > Sure. But this is devel list. Are developers themselves the target
> > audience?
>
> > :) Hopefully not. Is it defined somewhere?
> and, yes, 'developers themselves' -- again, "here" -- *are* a t
Hello everyone.
I wish to complete the updating of Sundials in Rawhide, so these
packages will be rebuilt in the next days by existing side-tag
f35-build-side-37890:
$ repoquery --whatrequires sundials*-devel --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=*-source
Last metadata expiration check: 0:19:21 ago
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210514.0):
ID: 887736 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/887736
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests comp
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210514.0):
ID: 887720 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210514.0):
ID: 887704 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
12 matches
Mail list logo
