Re: Draft of New Python Packaging Guidelines

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote: > I've proposed the new guidelines as a Fedora change: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonPackagingGuidelines202x Some comments: > For example, if a user runs pip install requests[security] Please quote

Re: Draft of New Python Packaging Guidelines

What do you/the packaging macros do when a pypi name is taken by two different packages? (For instance, how setuptools and distribute used the same name) -Toshio On Fri, Jun 11, 2021, 6:24 AM Petr Viktorin wrote: > I've proposed the new guidelines as a Fedora change: >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Python 3.10 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 08. 06. 21 1:01, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 06. 21 10:02, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.10, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10 If you see a

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Python 3.10 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 08. 06. 21 1:01, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 06. 21 10:02, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.10, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10 If you see a

Re: Self Introduction: Tiago d'Almeida

If your native language is portuguese, you might like to participate in the room #fedora-br on IRC Fedora Brazil | Telegram https://t.me/fedora_br On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 01:20 +0100, Tiago d'Almeida wrote: > Hello everyone! > I'm a newbie in these lists, but I have been using the Fedora OS

Re: Self Introduction: Tiago d'Almeida

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 01:20:40AM +0100, Tiago d'Almeida wrote: > Hello everyone! > I'm a newbie in these lists, but I have been using the Fedora OS since 2010 > (more or less). > I'ḿ a primarily web programmer, but I also like to help in open source > projects. > My presentation begins in this

Fedora-Rawhide-20210613.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 12 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 88/198 (x86_64), 56/134 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

[Bug 1971305] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.019 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971305 Bug ID: 1971305 Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.019 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dist-Zilla Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210613.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210612.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210613.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 30 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:11.21 MiB

Re: aom soname bump

On 5/18/21 8:25 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, AOM AV1 version 3 has been published a while ago and I am planning to update it in Fedora. Due to a CVE affecting versions prior to 2021-04-07 (CVE-2021-30473), I plan to push this update to ALL STABLE RELEASES:

Fedora-IoT-35-20210613.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 7/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210611.0): ID: 906999 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906999 ID: 907000 Test: x86_64

Re: package review of goocanvas2-cairotypes

I can help On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 at 10:25, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > I want to create a new package goocanvas2-cairotypes for Fedora. The > reason is, program shutter program needs it. > I've already started a review on bugzilla [1]. > > 1. must the name of the package be

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210613.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210612.0): ID: 906981 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906981 ID: 906982 Test: x86_64

package review of goocanvas2-cairotypes

Hi, I want to create a new package goocanvas2-cairotypes for Fedora. The reason is, program shutter program needs it. I've already started a review on bugzilla [1]. 1. must the name of the package be perl-goocanvas2-cairotypes? 2. is a -devel subpackage required at all? 3. can someone help me

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210613.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210612.0): ID: 906911 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: