Re: Rawhide CMake broken?

* Tom Stellard: > On 8/2/21 8:38 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm trying to fix vigra to work with OpenEXR 3 via the CONFIG method. >> In the OpenEXR config it has a "find_dependency(Threads REQUIRED)" >> and there's no complaint, but then building fails[1] with no such >> library as "Threads::Threa

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210803.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210802.0): ID: 939912 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:09 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > > Hello, > > recently, package 'community-mysql' started to FTBFS, because of lack > of resources on armv7hl builders in KOJI. > > Packages like 'mariadb' and 'community-mysql' are quite resource > hungry, both for disk and memory. > > Occasion

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

> I suspect it's not the builder that's running out of resources but a > single process exceeding the per process memory limit for 32 bit > applications. And is there any suggested way how to handle this situation? Some spec build macro or something? Thank you On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:16 AM Pet

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210803.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210802.0): ID: 939928 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On 03/08/2021 11:31, Lukas Javorsky wrote: And is there any suggested way how to handle this situation? Special hacks for ARMv7: 1. Build in one thread. 2. Reduce debug info: -g -> -g1 or even -g0. Some spec build macro or something? %ifarch %{arm} %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

So I set up the server and Fedora meetings, but I got this error: Server silver.libera.chat (Version solanum-1.0-dev), User modes: DGQRSZaghilopsuwz, Channel modes: CFILMPQSbcefgijklmnopqrstuvz [11:46] [Support] Lailah ETRACE FNC SAFELIST ELIST=CTU MONITOR=100 KNOCK WHOX CHANTYPES=# EXCEPTS INVEX

CPE Feedback Survey

Hey folks, Over the last several months we’ve been trying to continue our improvements with how we interact and share information with you all based on the feedback of the last surveys. From the blog posts, to mails and how we work on the tickets you send us. Here is a link to our very short su

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 17:43 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL > > > 3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On 02/08/2021 19:21, Silvia Sánchez wrote: I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel.  Can anyone give me a guide for dumbs about how to join it in IRC? Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience! You can use Matrix to connect to IRC channels. Very simple and easy. Steps: 1. Reg

Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Hello, I just did package review and noticed systemd service files are installed into %_unitdir without proper. I failed to notice all my packages install into the same directory without depending on that directory. I did not find explicit note about the issue anywhere in Packaging Guidelines. Un

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

Your package require systemd? Systemd own this directory? If yes it is OK https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_the_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package If you mean warning from fedora-review then it tool may be old. But re

Re: CPE Feedback Survey

Hey! Answered the survey now, cya at Nest On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:54 AM Ant Carroll wrote: > Hey folks, > > > Over the last several months we’ve been trying to continue our > improvements with how we interact and share information with you all based > on the feedback of the last surveys. From

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 17:43 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > > > I think at this stage it may be safer to defer

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

No, my packages do not always require systemd. It might be error in some cases, but I think %{?systemd_requires} is the only part usually required. Which means systemd has to be there during updates, but otherwise it leaves %_unitdir/*.service _partially_ reside in unowned directory. It is owned ju

IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’

Hi all. I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause of this error (in x86_64 and i386 architectures only): 18:10.81 /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-78.13.0/security/sandbox/linux/launch/SandboxLaunch.cpp:496:28: error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’ 18:10.81 496

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 06:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 17:43 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce w

Re: Need help with Rawtherapee F35 FTB

Il 01/08/21 00:06, Jerry James ha scritto: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: >> I need some help with Rawtherapee FTB with the recent mass rebuild: >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72487558 >> >> I tried asking upstream, but they weren't too

Re: IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’

* Antonio T.: > I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause of this error (in > x86_64 and i386 architectures only): > > 18:10.81 > /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-78.13.0/security/sandbox/linux/launch/SandboxLaunch.cpp:496:28: > > error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’

PSA: gtk-rs 0.14 updates landing in rawhide later this week

Over the past few days, I've been working on getting the gtk-rs stack updated to the latest versions. This includes the Rust bindings for GLib, GTK, GStreamer, WebKit2GTK, some other GNOME / GObject libraries, and two apps, image-roll and newsflash. Some packages that have not been ported to the n

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:10 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 06:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 17:43 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher > > > > wrote:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210803.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210802.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210803.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:130 Upgraded packages: 127 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 38.75 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-IoT-35-20210803.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210731.0): ID: 940516 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/940516 ID: 940519 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv

Re: Is there a command to expand Source0 from spec file to the final URL?

On 7/6/21 7:15 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is this possible? I've got one with lots of %{macros} in it. It seems like this should be possible using rpmspec, but I can't work out how. It's a bit hysterical, but then, this is rpm... `rpmspec --parse foo.spec|grep -i ^source0` might be the b

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

Thank you for the suggestions. I'll test reducing the debuginfo. However I still believe something else is in play, as such errors are normally very rare. The package has already been built without issues; it was the F35 mass rebuild which only bumped release, after which I noticed the FTBFS. I a

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

I get those messages too. They don't seem to be a problem. Steve On 8/3/21 5:48 AM, Silvia Sánchez wrote: So I set up the server and Fedora meetings, but I got this error:  Server silver.libera.chat (Version solanum-1.0-dev), User modes: DGQRSZaghilopsuwz, Channel modes: CFILMPQSbc

should leveldb have had an soname bump, and the associated notice?

in f35 leveldb-1.22's libleveldb.so.1.22 has, among others, the following: # nm -D libleveldb.so.1.22 | grep Logger | grep leveldb 000367f0 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD0Ev 00036740 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD1Ev 00036740 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD2Ev 000557a0 D _ZTIN7leveldb6LoggerE

Fedora-Rawhide-20210803.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Clou

Reminder: Change complete deadline, F35 branch next week

Hi everyone, We've reached that time in the schedule[1] where it's time to start thinking about deadlines. Specifically on Tuesday 10 August, all F35 Changes should be complete enough for testing. Indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to MODIFIED (or ON_QA if it's 100% complete). Also on

Re: Is there a command to expand Source0 from spec file to the final URL?

Dne 06. 07. 21 v 18:15 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): Is this possible? I've got one with lots of %{macros} in it. It seems like this should be possible using rpmspec, but I can't work out how. Late addition, not yet mentioned:  rpmdev-spectool --sources foo.spec Miroslav __

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-08-04 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&s

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

Neal Gompa writes: > Basically, my problem is that I don't think Sahana was prepared on how > to handle doing this work properly and they just need to be aware that > communication is extremely important when doing stuff like this. > Sahara took this over from Tomáš Mráz, who left Red Hat to work

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 07:52 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:10 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 06:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 17:43 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > >

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

Okay, let's take a step back for a moment. Sahana, do you still intend to land OpenSSL 3.0 in F35 or should we defer it to F36? If you do plan on including it in F35, what help from the rest of the community (if any) do you need? Anything that's not a direct answer to the above questions should s

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:42 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 07:52 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:10 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 06:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

It seems to me most of common services do not require systemd for functionality. They might be able to be installed in container without systemd involved. The more I look at [1], the more I think common package with some service should usually include just %systemd_{post,preun,postun_with_restart}

Re: Systemd unit files installed into unowned directories

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > It seems to me most of common services do not require systemd for > functionality. They might be able to be installed in container without > systemd involved. The more I look at [1], the more I think common > package with some service s

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > Thank you for the suggestions. > I'll test reducing the debuginfo. > > However I still believe something else is in play, as such errors are > normally very rare. > The package has already been built without issues; it was the F35 ma

Re: should leveldb have had an soname bump, and the associated notice?

* Kaleb Keithley: > in f35 leveldb-1.22's libleveldb.so.1.22 has, among others, the following: > > # nm -D libleveldb.so.1.22 | grep Logger | grep leveldb > 000367f0 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD0Ev > 00036740 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD1Ev > 00036740 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD2Ev > 0

Self Introduction: Amirerfan Rafati

Hi. I am Amirerfan Rafati. I am using Fedora for more than three years as my main OS. I have contributed to some open source projects. Now I want to try and contribute to fedora packaging. I have little packaging experience and I am trying to learn. I hope I could learn from you and help Fedor

Re: should leveldb have had an soname bump, and the associated notice?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:50 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kaleb Keithley: > > > in f35 leveldb-1.22's libleveldb.so.1.22 has, among others, the > following: > > > > # nm -D libleveldb.so.1.22 | grep Logger | grep leveldb > > 000367f0 T _ZN7leveldb6LoggerD0Ev > > 00036740 T _ZN7lev

Re: should leveldb have had an soname bump, and the associated notice?

* Kaleb Keithley: > ah, I missed that. I looked, but not hard enough apparently, and I presumed > it was related > to changes in the code. > > > > but I expect upstream does not care about ABI. > > Maybe the other way would be to patch that cha

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On 2021-08-03 2:48 a.m., Silvia Sánchez wrote: So I set up the server and Fedora meetings, but I got this error:  Server silver.libera.chat (Version solanum-1.0-dev), User modes: DGQRSZaghilopsuwz, Channel modes: CFILMPQSbcefgijklmnopqrstuvz [11:46] [Support] Lailah ETRACE FNC SAFELIST ELIST=

Re: Flagged projects in Anitya

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 8:54 PM Richard Fearn wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know who looks after flagged projects in Anitya? I've > flagged a couple of projects for deletion, but so far nothing has > happened. Thank you for bringing this up. The flags are processed by admins of Anitya. I have j

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 11:48 +0200, Silvia Sánchez wrote: > So I set up the server and Fedora meetings, but I got this error: > > Server silver.libera.chat (Version solanum-1.0-dev), User modes: > DGQRSZaghilopsuwz, Channel modes: CFILMPQSbcefgijklmnopqrstuvz > [11:46] [Support] Lailah ETRACE FNC

rawhide in mirrors.fedoraproject.org

I have test scripts upstream which runs UTs and valgrind checks for rawhide. Recently they broke due to the following error and similar with mirrors.fedoraproject.org: Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 - Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for https://mirrors

Re: rawhide in mirrors.fedoraproject.org

* Carol Bouchard: > I have test scripts upstream which runs UTs and valgrind checks for rawhide. > Recently they > broke due to the following error and similar with mirrors.fedoraproject.org: > > Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 - Curl > error (6): > Couldn't re

Re: rawhide in mirrors.fedoraproject.org

Thank you Florian. I'll chat with my peers on this. Carol On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:41 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carol Bouchard: > > > I have test scripts upstream which runs UTs and valgrind checks for > rawhide. Recently they > > broke due to the following error and similar with > mirrors.f

Excessive Messages In Journal From pipewire

This seems obnoxious: Aug 03 17:24:24 pipewire[3007]: 1 events suppressed Aug 03 17:24:24 pipewire[3007]: (speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng-54) client too slow! rate:256/48000 pos:968996864 status:triggered Aug 03 17:24:24 pipewire[3007]: (speech-dispatcher-dummy-60) client too slow! rate

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > Okay, let's take a step back for a moment. > > Sahana, do you still intend to land OpenSSL 3.0 in F35 or should we > defer it to F36? Hi Ben, others I would like to defer it to F36. OpenSSL 3.0 Beta2 (or Beta 3, if available) will land into ra

Re: Excessive Messages In Journal From pipewire

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:33:28PM -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: > This seems obnoxious: > > Aug 03 17:24:24 pipewire[3007]: 1 events suppressed > Aug 03 17:24:24 pipewire[3007]: (speech-dispatcher-espeak-ng-54) client > too slow! rate:256/48000 pos:968996864 status:triggered > Aug