Fedora-Rawhide-20210920.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MI

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210920.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210919.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210920.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 13 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 141 Downgraded packages: 2 Size of added packages: 39.88 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-09-13 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 00:18 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 00:02, Geoffrey Marr wrote: > > > # F35 Blocker Review meeting > > # Date: 2021-09-13 > > # Time: 16:00 UTC > > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat > > > > Hello testers! > > > > There are curre

Re: Fedora 35 compose report: 20210920.n.0 changes

On Mon, 2021-09-20 at 09:52 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'd like to note that: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-35-20210919.n.0/STATUS > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-35-20210920.n.0/STATUS > > are "FI

Re: Any thoughts about adding Apache Arrow to Fedora+EPEL ?

Out of all its dependencies, only one doesn't already exist in Fedora: apache ORC. I have a package review open at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989; if someone would be so kind as to pick it up so that I can keep this moving. Thanks. On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:26 AM Kaleb

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, 2021-09-20 at 22:13 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Jonathan Schleifer kirjoitti 20.9.2021 klo 19.16: > > Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > > > > 0ad  ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter   > > > 1 > > > weeks ago > > > > Also, how is the flatpak packa

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Jonathan Schleifer kirjoitti 20.9.2021 klo 19.16: Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok: 0ad  ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter   1 weeks ago Also, how is the flatpak package handled? I know how it works for RPM, but flatpak's all new to me and I see there's als

Re: Koji too busy?

On 20/09/2021 18:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Can you try running it with: I have network issues with Koji. Even curl hangs 7/10 times: $ curl -v https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ * Trying 38.145.60.21:443... * Connected to koji.fedoraproject.org (38.145.60.21) port 443 (#0) * ALPN, offering h2

Re: Strange mock chainbuild issue: package has incorrect checksum

W dniu 20.09.2021 o 19:45, Jerry James pisze: On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:49 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: my local kernel rebuilds have started failing for no apparent reason - I was using a similar command successfully for several months. /mnt/openmediavault is a samba share. This is what gets out

Re: Strange mock chainbuild issue: package has incorrect checksum

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:49 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: > my local kernel rebuilds have started failing for no apparent reason - I > was using a similar command successfully for several months. > /mnt/openmediavault is a samba share. This is what gets output into the log: [snip] > /mnt/openmedia

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

* Dan Horák: > Florian, can the patch go upstream as it is or are there any side > effects when the resulting binary would run on system with glibc < 2.34? ELF constructors for the main program will not run on glibc < 2.34. But I don't think there will be immediate crashes. Whether the missing E

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:34:44 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:15:44 +0200 > Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Dan Horák: > > > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 - > > > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > > > > > >> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compile

Re: Self Introduction: Saqib Ali

On 9/20/21 9:02 AM, Saqib Ali wrote: > Hey everyone, > > First post on this list :) I'm Saqib Ali and I'm a student at the University > of Toronto. I'm currently an intern at Red Hat on the CoreOS team. > I've been working with Fedora CoreOS and attended the last Flock to Fedora > (nice to se

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:43:20PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hey everybody, > > Yeah, it's *that* time of the year again. I have again compared Fedora > 34 and Fedora 35 repository contents to check for package downgrades. > I have categorized all issues in the complete list below. Common >

Re: Koji too busy?

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 20/09/2021 15:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Could you and others help the Fedora admins with more info on what you > > mean by unstable? > > I need to run fedpkg build 3-10 times before the build actually starts.

Re: Fedora 35 compose report: 20210920.n.0 changes

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:55:51PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-35-20210919.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-35-20210920.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:0 > Dropped images: 0 > Added packages: 0 > Dropped packages:0 > Upgraded

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 07:24:28PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: > > > > On 9/18/21 3:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > On 17/09/21 14:07, Ben Cotton wrote: > > >> I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat > >

Strange mock chainbuild issue: package has incorrect checksum

Hi, my local kernel rebuilds have started failing for no apparent reason - I was using a similar command successfully for several months. /mnt/openmediavault is a samba share. This is what gets output into the log: $ mock --chain --localrepo /mnt/openmediavault/kernel/ -r fedora-34-x86_64 --

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:15:44 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Dan Horák: > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 - > > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > > > >> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler > >> package failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok: 0ad  ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter   1 weeks ago I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would need sponsorship. Also, how is the flatpak package handled? I know how it works for RPM, but flat

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

* Dan Horák: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 - > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > >> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler package >> failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64, i686 and ppc64le, >> related to the new glibc 2.34. x86_64 and arm we

Fedora-35-20210920.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/204 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210919.n.0): ID: 991800 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/991800 ID: 991809 Test

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > ... - ulauncher-0:5.13.0-1.fc34 > ulauncher-0:5.12.1-1.fc35 > ... I just submitted the new ulauncher 5.14 update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-894c62b141 (and similarly for F34) so it should be resolved shortly. ___

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

On 20/09/21 15:36, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > In order to avoid retiring FPC (and all the other dependent packages) from > Fedora due to the FTBFS issue, we want to temporarily disable support for the > failing architectures (aarch64, i686 and ppc64le), leaving only the working > ones (arm

No FESCo Meeting today (2021-09-20)

There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm canceling this week's meeting. I'll pick this up again next week if we have anything. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

We'll remove these from %{fpc_arches} so that dependent packages can rebuild without requiring changes to spec files. A.FI. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

Should i disabled myself this arches for Goverlay or you add them into `ExclusiveArch: %{fpc_arches}` and rebuild affected packages yourself? Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis

Updated libchafa.so.0.1.1 to libchafa.so.0.6.0 in rawhide

Thanks to Mikel Olasagasti, we have finally updated the chafa package in rawhide. There is a soname bump, but no dependent packages. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chafa/c/01b0592411 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 - "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler package > failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64, i686 and ppc64le, > related to the new glibc 2.34. x86_64 and arm we unaffected, however. >

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210920.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210919.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210920.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Koji too busy?

On 20/09/2021 15:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Could you and others help the Fedora admins with more info on what you mean by unstable? I need to run fedpkg build 3-10 times before the build actually starts. No errors. Nothing. It just hangs. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycodin

Free Pascal and the new glibc

Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler package failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64, i686 and ppc64le, related to the new glibc 2.34. x86_64 and arm we unaffected, however. This was discussed briefly here on devel in thread [2]. The issue was submi

Re: Need some advice as a user impacted by the retirement of the Unison package

[Anonymously forwarding this to devel mailing list] > First, thank you for having maintained the Unison packages in Fedora > for years, as I suppose keeping it compatible with other distros (or > even with Fedora itself) through OCaml version nonsense must not > have been particularly fun. You hav

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: As usual, I'm asking: Is it OK for me to fix obvious oversights, such as "package was built successfully, it just needs to be submitted to bodhi" or "packager obviously only forgot to merge a change to f35 and build it there as wel

Self Introduction: Saqib Ali

Hey everyone, First post on this list :) I'm Saqib Ali and I'm a student at the University of Toronto. I'm currently an intern at Red Hat on the CoreOS team. I've been working with Fedora CoreOS and attended the last Flock to Fedora (nice to see all the cool things people are working on). I'm

Re: Koji too busy?

On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 04:21, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 20/09/2021 09:41, Евгений Пивнев wrote: > > What happened with koji? > > I can confirm. Koji is too unstable since Thursday. > Could you and others help the Fedora admins with more info on what you mean by unstable? Currently k

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:48 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > >> Shouldn't we rethink how we provide such packages? I am thinking about > >> something like providing the compat packages as a subpackages of the > >> original package? > > The problem with this scheme is that this breaks down completely

Orphaning 4 Python packages - first, pipreqs, plette, yarg

Hello. I plan to orphan 4 Python packages: python-first, python-pipreqs, python-plette, and python-yarg. They were unbundled from pipenv but because we've decided to keep them bundled there, they are leaf and nothing depends on them in rawhide. Only yarg is required by plette so it makes sen

Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

Hey everybody, Yeah, it's *that* time of the year again. I have again compared Fedora 34 and Fedora 35 repository contents to check for package downgrades. I have categorized all issues in the complete list below. Common issues are the same as last few releases: - package was built for f35 but no

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

Hello Sahana and Jakub, openssl-pkcs11 module failed during rebuild. It has no separate bug yet, but missing pkcs11 engine for OpenSSL 3.0 bind build makes freeipa server fail to even start. Filled bug #2005832 [1]. CentOS Stream 9 build of openssl-pkcs11 were successful, I think there are missin

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 20.09.21 11:40, Florian Weimer wrote: * Sandro Mani: Anyone encountered this one? Google just gives a single hit for ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED, which is a rhbz bug [1]. This is kinda fatal for nodejs/webpack development :S MD4 has been deprecated since about 1995. It should be possible to

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210920.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210919.0): ID: 991489 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

* Sandro Mani: > Anyone encountered this one? Google just gives a single hit for > ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED, which is a rhbz bug [1]. This is kinda fatal for > nodejs/webpack development :S MD4 has been deprecated since about 1995. It should be possible to re-activate these old algorithms:

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 08.09.21 09:59, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hi all, An update that I will directly bring in the OpenSSL 3.0.0 final RC (released upstream yesterday) into rawhide in the next few days. (Compared to beta2, this version has one moderate CVE-2021-3712 fix in addition to other fixes.) Looks like n

Review request: mingw-python-packaging, mingw-python-pyparsing, mingw-python-PyQt-builder, mingw-python-toml

Hi I'd like to build sip 6.x for mingw, and need the following dependencies: mingw-python-packaging - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005806 mingw-python-pyparsing - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2005807 mingw-python-PyQt-builder - https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide > now. > > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. > > > > The follow

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

Dne 18. 09. 21 v 10:18 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:06 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 16. 09. 21 v 14:19 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: = ADDED PACKAGES ==

Re: Koji too busy?

Local build (rpmbuild) - 40 sec (Intel G3450, 2x~3GHz, 4GB RAM, F34). mock not tested > 20 сент. 2021 г., в 11:17, Dan Horák написал(а): > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:41:44 +0300 > Евгений Пивнев wrote: > >> What happened with koji? >> I started 2 tasks, they are running about 12 hours and not fi

Re: Koji too busy?

On 20/09/2021 09:41, Евгений Пивнев wrote: What happened with koji? I can confirm. Koji is too unstable since Thursday. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Koji too busy?

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:41:44 +0300 Евгений Пивнев wrote: > What happened with koji? > I started 2 tasks, they are running about 12 hours and not finished yet: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75961092 > > https:/

Koji too busy?

What happened with koji? I started 2 tasks, they are running about 12 hours and not finished yet: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75961092 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75960977

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210920.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210919.0): ID: 991473 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op