On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:24:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > == Owner ==
> > * Name: [[User:Zbyszek|Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]]
> > * Email: zbys...@in.waw.pl
> > * Name: Lennart Poettering
> > * Email: mzsrq...@0pointer.net
>
> > All binaries (executables and shared libraries) ar
Hi,
Even in native language anaconda majority of users prefer and choose US
keyboard layout. This proposal[1] is to pull US layout at the top of the list.
User story: As a US keyboard layout user, I would like to be able to find the
US keyboard layout in my own language quickly and easily in th
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:47:14AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Sounds as if we need to keep ImageMagick 6.x for legacy reasons as long as
> it's safe to do so, but instead of switching to 7.x at some point,
> switching to GraphicsMagick is at most as much work if not less, but more
> future-pr
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> If it's a general issue, it'll break kinit etc. for all package
> maintainers as soon as they get the update. (Running `fedpkg
> new-sources` was how I ran into the issue).
I can't reproduce, but I'm _just_ using Fedora kerberos. (Theo
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Zbyszek|Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]]
> * Email: zbys...@in.waw.pl
> * Name: Lennart Poettering
> * Email: mzsrq...@0pointer.net
> All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an
> ELF note that identifies the rpm for which this file was built.
You could use rpm fusion nonfree nvidia in the software updater
Also:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NVIDIA-495.44-Linux-Driver
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
Support glibc-hwcaps in rpm
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1812
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedora
Support glibc-hwcaps in rpm
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1812
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedor
Hello team,
I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
upstream.
Learning from the previous experiences, I or my co-maintainer are
planning to commit and build this package for Rawhide only in about a
week, so the following maintainers of the respective packages will n
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211024.n.0):
ID: 1041080 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1041080
ID: 1041086 Test:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 3/206 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same te
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 11:26 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers
>
> * Other developers:
> ** It should not affect other packages but may be that plymouth or
> display managers could need some work.
> ** Test and watch for regressions.
>
> * Relea
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 6:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:27 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > This change replaces the legacy Linux frame buffer device (fbdev)
> > drivers that are still us
It has been included as far as I remember (just go to localhost:631 to
check). It is still included in F35. As far as I know there are no plans
to remove it for F36, so it still exists in Rawhide.
On 10/25/21 2:52 AM, Felipe Borges wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 1:42 AM Reon Beon via devel
wr
All packages have been rebuild and the side tag has been merged. I was
not able to rebuild the following packages:
* bear
* community-mysql
* et
* marble (appstream-util validate-relax failure)
* mir (dependency resolution error)
* mumble
* opentrep
* osmpbf (ppc64le only build error)
* m
Hello,
A very strange problem... on one of my fedora
build machine I'm getting the following error
when I do a git pull
$ git pull
sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed for RSA "/home/steved/.ssh/id_rsa"
from agent: agent refused operation
ste...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publi
OLD: Fedora-35-20211024.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211025.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211023.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211025.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 625.09 KiB
Size of dropped packages:101
On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 05:48:14 PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
None of these feel like cmake-specific flags to me, because -DNDEBUG
is applicable to all build chains
-NDEBUG is different, though, because upstream CMake defines that for
release builds, so upstream projects probably e
Ideally, I think the %cmake macro should only add new cmake-specific flags
that are needed and not add any other ones not defined by the base
distribution to the build. None of these feel like cmake-specific flags to
me, because -DNDEBUG is applicable to all build chains, and the others are
in %opt
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rubygem-cucumber_7.1.0
== Summary ==
Rubygem-cucumber 7.1.0 is the latest version of the popular
integration BDD testing framework for Ruby.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Jackorp1 | Jaroslav Prokop]], [[User:pvalena| Pavel Valena]]
* Email: jpro...@redhat.com,
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:27 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This change replaces the legacy Linux frame buffer device (fbdev)
> drivers that are still used in Fedora, with the latest simpledrm
> driver and the DRM fbdev em
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers
== Summary ==
This change replaces the legacy Linux frame buffer device (fbdev)
drivers that are still used in Fedora, with the latest simpledrm
driver and the DRM fbdev emulation layer.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Javierm|Javier Martine
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021, Roman Inflianskas via devel wrote:
Subject: Self Introduction: Roman Inflianskas
Dear Fedora Community,My name is Roman Inflianskas.I work at aiven.io (DBaaS
based on Open-Source technologies) as a Python
Backend Developer, and my motivation for becoming a Fedora maintaine
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, October 25th, 2021 at 5:41 AM, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
>
> speech-dispatcher orphan 2 weeks ago
Taken.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-10-27 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting&s
On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 09:06:37 AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
And that means we should not need ExcludeArch after all. Pretty sure
I can make it build now that we understand what went wrong. Happy
ending? Probably, let's see
CC: Björn. I wonder if you expected cmake to propagate thes
On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 03:40:39 PM +0200, Dan Horák
wrote:
there is a chance on armv7 I think
+ /usr/bin/cmake -S . -B redhat-linux-build
'-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-O2 -g -DNDEBUG'
'-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-O2 -g -DNDEBUG'
the "-g" here IMO overrides the -g1 from the earlier fla
Dear Fedora Community,My name is Roman Inflianskas.I work at aiven.io (DBaaS
based on Open-Source technologies) as a Python Backend Developer, and my
motivation for becoming a Fedora maintainer is to package software that is
used by Aiven so that my effort had more impact. I contributed to
SaltStac
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 23:40:25 +0200,
Peter Boy wrote:
Fedora 35 comes obviously without Postgres module 9.6. Unfortunately, the
release change set doesn’t mention that. We need a clear indication and warning
of this.
That might be because 9.6 gets its last update in about two weeks. Thi
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:25:55 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 03:06:18 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
> wrote:
> > I second to Fabio's request. It's not OK to drop webkitgtk secondary
> > architectures without coordination. Please revert this immediately
> > and do a system wid
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 3:26 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 03:06:18 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
> wrote:
> > I second to Fabio's request. It's not OK to drop webkitgtk secondary
> > architectures without coordination. Please revert this immediately
> > and do a system wide chan
On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 03:06:18 PM +0200, Kalev Lember
wrote:
I second to Fabio's request. It's not OK to drop webkitgtk secondary
architectures without coordination. Please revert this immediately
and do a system wide change proposal instead. The net effect of
dropping webkitgtk is that all o
On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 02:44:53 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
For example, will this mean
Fedora can no longer produce Workstation (or other Spins) images for
arm, (given that e.g. gnome-shell transitively depends on
webkit2gtk3)?
Well for 32-bit ARM yes, for sure.
But aarch64 will be fine
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:45 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:09 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 06:25:58 PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> > > I'll probably add an ExcludeArch and leave it for 32-bit users to
> > > deal with.
> >
> > OK,
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:09 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 06:25:58 PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > I'll probably add an ExcludeArch and leave it for 32-bit users to
> > deal with.
>
> OK, in conclusion, this is what I wound up doing.
>
> Unfortunately, the armv7
In one week (Nov. 2), or slightly later, I will merge [1] and build
python-pytest-bdd 5.0.0 in Rawhide.
There are minor API changes that require changes to some tests that use
it; see [2].
This notice is a formality, since I maintain the only dependent
package[3] and I already applied the ne
On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 06:25:58 PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I'll probably add an ExcludeArch and leave it for 32-bit users to
deal with.
OK, in conclusion, this is what I wound up doing.
Unfortunately, the armv7hl build has started failing with the same
problem, even though it was wor
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2021-10-25 at 15:09 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> I like this idea. It will be really useful when multiple distros adopt
> it.
>
>
> It isn't immediately clear to me which of the key's will be included.
> The format describes 6 standard ones: type, os, osVersion, name,
> versio
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/204 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
ID: 1039835 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039835
ID: 1039921 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or
Hi,
On Mon, 2021-10-25 at 15:09 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects
I like this idea. It will be really useful when multiple distros adopt
it.
> === New system: `.note.package` ===
>
> The new note is created and propagated simila
Sounds as if we need to keep ImageMagick 6.x for legacy reasons as long as it's
safe to do so, but instead of switching to 7.x at some point, switching to
GraphicsMagick is at most as much work if not less, but more future-proof?
[Judging from the current state of upstreams which is subject to c
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211025.0):
ID: 1040380 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1040380
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 35 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211025.0):
ID: 1039555 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039555
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64),
V Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:23:29PM +0200, Peter Boy napsal(a):
>
> > Am 24.10.2021 um 04:55 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
> >
> > I've never used the modules, but with rpms, you get the postgresql-upgrade
> > package installed as well in order to upgrade the database. Is this not
> > available with modul
46 matches
Mail list logo
