Fedora-Cloud-33-20211109.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211108.0): ID: 1057767 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Self Introduction: Alexander Bulimov

On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 16:19 +, Alexander Bulimov wrote: > Hello! > > I work at Facebook on the team dealing with all things NTP/PTP, > including the OCP Time Appliance Project. > > We've already open-sourced lots of related software, Davide Cavalca > kindly packaged most of it, and from now o

Firmware packages

In the recent discussion about saving space (in the ELF thread) there poped up linux-firmware topic several time. Let's kick it off as separate thread. I have several question and I am unable to find the answer for them. 1. How do I find which firmware package I need? On my workstation I have:

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/8/21 12:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Sat, 2021-11-06 at 07:43 +, Daniel Alley wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski- >>> Górecki wrote: >>> I do think we should drop drpms or make them more useful, but I >>> don't >>> think there's any security angle her

Re: Automated formal verification of RPM packages

On Monday, November 8, 2021 7:10:45 PM CET Jerry James wrote: > Nice! Thanks for working on this. I tried to use the csmock plugin, > but got this at the end of the build (on an x86_64 F34 host, building > for fedora-35-x86_64): > > + for file in > /tmp/csmockadxnd155/metamath-0.198-1.fc36/debu

License change for stockfish: GPLv3+ -> GPLv3+ and CC0

Hi, The stockfish package will start building from an additional source file containing trained neural network weights, which is provided under the Creative Commons Zero license. See the pending pull request for more details: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stockfish/pull-request/1 -- Ondrej

Re: [Qa-tools-sig] Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > python-pylibmcabompard, orphan, pjp1 weeks > ago > Taken. -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Quality Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list --

Re: dnf "no match for group package" on upgrade...

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 05:01:47PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:55:42PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > +1 to both. > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1795 > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10376 I'll add here that even thoug

Re: dnf "no match for group package" on upgrade...

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:55:42PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > +1 to both. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1795 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10376 -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing lis

Re: dnf "no match for group package" on upgrade...

On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 15:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I'm seeing a number of people confused by this message, usually followed by > some actual transaction error. > > I _think_ this is happening because these packages are in comps but do not > exist in the distro. Is this correct? I tried to

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mo, 08.11.21 13:54, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > One of the reasons we are sticking to JSON here is so that we can use > > > battle-tested parsers we already use for other stuff. you want a > > > parser that is already used, verified, tested elsewhere, and JSON > > > makes

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:06:17PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > I was thinking more about this proposal over the past weekend and > where I keep ending up is that this is really optimizing for a small > use case by touching ELF metadata all over the system. And that > strikes me as pretty invasiv

Re: dnf "no match for group package" on upgrade...

On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 21:41, Matthew Miller wrote: [...] > I think we should: > > 1. Have a scheduled standard task to remove any packages listed but >non-existent after branch from rawhide. (I assume a Rel-Eng task?) > > 2. Have DNF make this message less scary. Maybe even move down

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:26:20AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > But a binary representation of that could strip it down into ~50%. Would it though? Have you tested and checked it to make that determination? Can you share the code to reproduce it? The values necessarily have t

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:43:33AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > Deltarpm did > > reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007 > > > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.  I've > read Kevin's explanation

dnf "no match for group package" on upgrade...

I'm seeing a number of people confused by this message, usually followed by some actual transaction error. I _think_ this is happening because these packages are in comps but do not exist in the distro. Is this correct? I tried to search for it, but the error message is _very_ common in ... well,

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:06:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > I would like to create a long-running rawhide side tag for preparing > Fedora for the removal of implicit function declarations from the GCC > defaults. This is a change that happened in the C99 version of the > language, but GCC co

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > I was thinking more about this proposal over the past weekend and > where I keep ending up is that this is really optimizing for a small > use case by touching ELF metadata all over the system. And that > strikes me as pret

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-11-08)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-11-08/fesco.2021-11-08-19.02.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-11-08/fesco.2021-11-08-19.02.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-11-08/fesco.2021-11-08-19.02.log.html

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject

No responsive maintainer xenithorb

Hi, Anyone knows if xenithorb is still active in Fedora? It's been years since the last update of the package btrbk and he/she hasn't replied to my question in bugzilla [1]. I've created the non-responsive maintainer bug [2]. If anyone knows anything, please, ping me. I'm interested in updatin

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Do, 28.10.21 12:10, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: Thanks for revising the change proposal and filling in more details. After reading through it, I have some questions: 1) The proposal notes that users tend to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

I've taken it, but I can let you work on the FTBFS if you like. Or I can. Whichever. :) --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Messag

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:17:09PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 29.10.21 13:57, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: > Has there been any consideration for potential security risks with > regards to

Re: Automated formal verification of RPM packages

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:23 AM Kamil Dudka wrote: > Formal verification of RPM packages with CBMC, Divine, and Symbiotic is now > easier than ever before! csmock plug-ins for these tools are now available > in stable Fedora releases. The plug-ins are still experimental and they have > some techn

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 15:02, Sergio Pascual () escribió: > > > El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 14:36, Stephen John Smoogen () > escribió: > >> >> Can you try downgrading to the F34 linux-firmware and see if the f34 >> kernel sees the chipset again? >> >> >> > I have downgraded everything to the releas

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sat, 2021-11-06 at 07:43 +, Daniel Alley wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski- > > Górecki wrote: > > I do think we should drop drpms or make them more useful, but I > > don't > > think there's any security angle here. (see below) > > > > drpms work by dow

Fedora-IoT-36-20211108.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211027.0): ID: 1056905 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1056905 ID

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

> SDL2_gfx ignatenkobrain, orphan 1 weeks ago I'd like to pick this up, but I have next to zero experience working with autotools, so I'll defer adopting the package until I have a working fix for the FTBFS. ___ devel m

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

* Kevin Kofler via devel: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> Eventually, we'll have to fix the Fedora packages if there's no upstream >> release with the fixes. > > We just have to add -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration to the build > flags of the offending packages (same as for format-security).

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20211108.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20211108.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Join the Release Party for Fedora Linux 35 - Nov. 12 - 13

Hi Fedora Friends, Fedora Linux 35 is now officially available — read the announcement on Fedora Magazine [1]. Join us at the upcoming Release Party for Fedora Linux 35, happening later this week Friday, Nov. 12, and Saturday, Nov. 13. Register her

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 04:32, Michael Schroeder wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:43:02AM -, Daniel Alley wrote: >> > Another issue - which is not per-se a security issue but it's still a >> > problem - is that deltarpm uses md5 checksums pervasively. Th

Planned Outage - bodhi.fedoraproject.org - 2021-11-10 8:00 UTC External

Planned Outage - bodhi.fedoraproject.org - 2021-11-10 08:00 UTC There will be an outage starting on monday at 2021-11-10 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

Florian Weimer wrote: > Eventually, we'll have to fix the Fedora packages if there's no upstream > release with the fixes. We just have to add -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration to the build flags of the offending packages (same as for format-security). Kevin Kofler ___

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Andreas Schneider wrote: > I have electron building offline for Fedora, you can find it here: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:im:signal/nodejs-electron I see from the presence of electron-13-openh264-format-security.patch that you are building the bundled OpenH264. This is no

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fed

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:50 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:16 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > >> > >> On 08/11/2021 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > >> > I'm interested in this, as I try to package electron for Fedora. > >> > >> El

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 05:19:39PM -0600, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote: > Having deltarpms turned on by default would seem to make the most sense in > the > IOT/Edge space, but in order to reap the most benefit these systems would > have > to download the deltas daily. Fedora IoT uses rpm

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:16 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: >> >> On 08/11/2021 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: >> > I'm interested in this, as I try to package electron for Fedora. >> >> Electron can't be build completely from sources without downloading >> pre-built bin

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 16:52 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > platform  orphan, sergiomb 4 > weeks ago I took it because is needed by libcec , I was already maintainer of the package -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

Hi, On 11/8/21 22:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ho

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > And does Chromium fully work with HTML5 video if you do that? In > particular, does it correctly report the list of supported codecs to the > website? Last I checked, Chromium hardcoded the list of supported codecs > at compile time (and there were actually only 2 ha

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Andreas Schneider wrote: > there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG > (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The package > could be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version > from rpmfusion to get to the full encoder/decoder set

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Chromium was checked by legal. I'm not aware of any other Fedora > packages bundling a subset of FFmpeg. qt5-qtwebengine does it too, using a fork of the cleanup script from the Chromium package. Kevin Kofler ___

Self Introduction: Alexander Bulimov

Hello! I work at Facebook on the team dealing with all things NTP/PTP, including the OCP Time Appliance Project. We've already open-sourced lots of related software, Davide Cavalca kindly packaged most of it, and from now on I'll be actively supporting and updating it. My focus for now will be o

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers​

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Monday, November 8, 2021 3:43:37 PM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 08/11/2021 15:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I've done an offline build with some prep work upfront, yes. > > > Fully offline with rebuilding all JS dependencies from sources? > > All minified JS blobs must be rebuild

[SONAME BUMP] libcint 5.0.0 / qcint 5.0.0

Hi, libcint 5.0.0 and qcint 5.0.0 have been released, with a soname bump. I'll be pushing the update in one week to rawhide. The only affected package is python-pyscf, which is also mine, and which I'll be similarly updating to version 2.0.1 that has also been released recently. -- Susi Lehtola

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:36 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 08:16, Sergio Pascual wrote: > > > > > > El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 13:39, Stephen John Smoogen () > > escribió: > >> > >> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, I upgraded my workst

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:44 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 08/11/2021 15:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I've done an offline build with some prep work upfront, yes. > > Fully offline with rebuilding all JS dependencies from sources? > > All minified JS blobs must be rebuild from sources on F

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On 08/11/2021 15:35, Neal Gompa wrote: I've done an offline build with some prep work upfront, yes. Fully offline with rebuilding all JS dependencies from sources? All minified JS blobs must be rebuild from sources on Fedora infra instead of downloading them from npm with direct links. It'

Fedora-Rawhide-20211108.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 67/141 (aarch64), 108/206 (x86_64) New failures (same test not faile

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:34 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 08/11/2021 15:25, Neal Gompa wrote: > > This is not true anymore. > > Have you tested the build without network access? Because even Flatpaks > download everything from npm. > I've done an offline build with some prep work upfr

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On 08/11/2021 15:25, Neal Gompa wrote: This is not true anymore. Have you tested the build without network access? Because even Flatpaks download everything from npm. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:16 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 08/11/2021 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > I'm interested in this, as I try to package electron for Fedora. > > Electron can't be build completely from sources without downloading > pre-built binaries/blobs from npm. > This

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

On 8/11/21 11:02, Sergio Pascual wrote: El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 14:36, Stephen John Smoogen () escribió: Can you try downgrading to the F34 linux-firmware and see if the f34 kernel sees the chipset again? I have downgraded everything to the released F35 and now it works, with

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On 08/11/2021 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: I'm interested in this, as I try to package electron for Fedora. Electron can't be build completely from sources without downloading pre-built binaries/blobs from npm. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

On 11/8/21 5:53 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote: Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated' and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no keyword. I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of my optical mouse in

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 14:36, Stephen John Smoogen () escribió: > > Can you try downgrading to the F34 linux-firmware and see if the f34 > kernel sees the chipset again? > > > I have downgraded everything to the released F35 and now it works, with kernel 5.14.16-301 and linux-firmware-20210919-1

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On 11/8/21 13:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 11:51, Andreas Schneider wrote: On Monday, November 8, 2021 10:55:32 AM CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: Hi, there are several packag

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

Dne 08. 11. 21 v 12:53 Sergio Pascual napsal(a): Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated' and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no keyword. I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of my optical mou

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 08:16, Sergio Pascual wrote: > > > El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 13:39, Stephen John Smoogen () > escribió: >> >> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote: >> > >> > Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf >> > updated' and rebooted. After th

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

I have a similar system. lspci out looks near identical. The system was just booted this morning. I normally run it headless with just power and network connected, but plugging in a USB mouse, thumb drive, and USB optical drive, they show up fine in dmesg and lsusb output using random USB port

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:27 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Neal Gompa: > > > Seems like a worthy effort to me. Though instead of having branches > > for redhat-rpm-config, you could add macros to flag it on and off by > > default, and have releng configure a side-tag for you that turns it on > > f

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

* Neal Gompa: > Seems like a worthy effort to me. Though instead of having branches > for redhat-rpm-config, you could add macros to flag it on and off by > default, and have releng configure a side-tag for you that turns it on > for package builds (we can have macros set for build tags). Is it p

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 6:56 AM edmond pilon wrote: > > CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y > CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=m > # CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE is not set > > Fix the issue. These configs are in preparation for an F36 potential feature, and were not intended to work flawlessly on F35 or earlier. They were backed ou

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 13:39, Stephen John Smoogen () escribió: > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual > wrote: > > > > Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf > updated' and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No > mouse, no keyword. > > I kn

Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:07 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > I would like to create a long-running rawhide side tag for preparing > Fedora for the removal of implicit function declarations from the GCC > defaults. This is a change that happened in the C99 version of the > language, but GCC could not

Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

I would like to create a long-running rawhide side tag for preparing Fedora for the removal of implicit function declarations from the GCC defaults. This is a change that happened in the C99 version of the language, but GCC could not adopt at the time because too much software was broken by it. E

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211108.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211107.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211108.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 86 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:5.82 MiB

Re: Rawhide kernel crash

CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=m # CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE is not set Fix the issue. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote: > > Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated' > and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no > keyword. > I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 11:51, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Monday, November 8, 2021 10:55:32 AM CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > there are several packages in the distribution which r

Re: F35 no USB after today's updates

> Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated' > and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no > keyword. > I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of > my optical mouse in on until some errors appear in t

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 12:01, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 8, 2021 10:55:32 AM CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > H

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 04:32, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:43:02AM -, Daniel Alley wrote: > > Another issue - which is not per-se a security issue but it's still a > > problem - is that deltarpm uses md5 checksums pervasively. They're > > everywhere. And it uses i

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/8/21 5:02 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 11:47 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: >> >> Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: >>> - there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth nowadays >>> tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 13:44, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > Deltarpm did > > reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007 > > > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. > I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's n

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 05:17, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/8/21 01:23, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/7/21 12:15 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > >> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world > >> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms m

F35 no USB after today's updates

Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated' and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no keyword. I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of my optical mouse in on until some errors appear in the kernel dur

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-11-08)

[Note the DST change in many places: the meeting may move up one hour for you.] Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/U

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sat, 2021-11-06 at 23:46 +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > - there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth > > nowadays > >     tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding actually > >     slower than downloading th

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:51 AM Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Monday, November 8, 2021 10:55:32 AM CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > there are several packages in the distribution which require

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Monday, November 8, 2021 10:55:32 AM CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG > > (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromiu

Fedora-IoT-35-20211108.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211101.0): ID: 1055901 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1055901 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests comple

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/8/21 01:23, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: On 11/7/21 12:15 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 11:47 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > - there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth nowadays > > tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding actually > > slower than downloading the wh

Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG > (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The package > could > be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version fro

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 08 November (Today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 08th November (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedorapr

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211108.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211107.0): ID: 1055871 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:43:02AM -, Daniel Alley wrote: > Another issue - which is not per-se a security issue but it's still a problem > - is that deltarpm uses md5 checksums pervasively. They're everywhere. And > it uses its own implementation of md5 which doesn't respect FIPS, so even

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/7/21 12:15 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world > where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a > lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data > expenses. So i feel turning

Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora

Hi, there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The package could be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version from rpmfusion to get to the full encoder/decoder set including H264 etc. Thi

Re: F35 mock w/ nosync broken?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019329 Vít Dne 07. 11. 21 v 19:27 Richard Shaw napsal(a): I just upgraded to F35 and I'm trying to build a package via mock and I'm getting the following error: /usr/bin/python3: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by /var

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211108.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211107.0): ID: 1055854 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Automated formal verification of RPM packages

Formal verification of RPM packages with CBMC, Divine, and Symbiotic is now easier than ever before! csmock plug-ins for these tools are now available in stable Fedora releases. The plug-ins are still experimental and they have some technical limitations: - They work only for source RPM packages