https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030727
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(andr...@bawue.net |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030727
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|andr...@bawue.net |jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033766
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration/Status
As an added point, there would be nice to be added here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
___
devel mailing list --
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration/Status
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034011
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro
On 12/19/21 12:17, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hi all.
Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many
changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which
need attention before we can
> Well I think OpenCL would be a good starting point since it's been around for
> a while
> and lots of applications use it.
>
> Fedora already has some of the base components already (hsakmt, rocm-runtime,
> llvm). For
> OCL, fedora would just need:
> - ROCm-Device-Libs (bitcode compiled by
> Should it work in KDE/Gnome,etc?
>
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/refresh-rate-of-monitor/13481/3
@ Reon Beon
I don't really know what you are asking ... If there is an issue with your
monitor refresh rate, or changing the refresh rate does not work in any desktop
environment, maybe
Or xrandr?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Should it work in KDE/Gnome,etc?
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/refresh-rate-of-monitor/13481/3
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> For anyone else wondering:
>
> https://rocmdocs.amd.com/en/latest/index.html
>
> AMD ROCm is the first open-source software development platform for
> HPC/Hyperscale-class GPU computing. AMD ROCm brings the UNIX
> philosophy of choice, minimalism and modular software development to
>
I know that "Fedora" cannot do it. I didn't made any request.
The point is that this proposal can be canceled/reverted if the nvidia-settings
GUI does not work on Wayland on time, or depending on what others think about
the use of nvidia-settings.
And... Please don't imagine things I didn't
It would be nice to have the latest version of
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-runtime also.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877523
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
Hi all,
I was updating some golang specs I've and switching them to use
go_generate_buildrequires.
I realized that some specs that are using it fail to build if `%global
debug_package %{nil}` is not set. Same spec with all BuildRequires
defined works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034031
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:06:45PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Basically, it seems like we're moving too slowly to keep up with changes in
> > Kubernetes, with trickle-down consequences.
>
> Sure, I saw that ticket. But I fail to see how this is this a "new problem".
> If you use, for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034053
Bug ID: 2034053
Summary: perl-Inline-Struct-0.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Inline-Struct
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211218.0):
ID: 1089876 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032838
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034048
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031800
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031800
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2034048, 2031268
Doc
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/595
Pavel
___
devel mailing list --
On 19.12.21 18:52, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 19.12.21 15:56, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Now, depending packages seem to be broken. Have ypu pushed the
side-tag incompletely, or does the new tesseract -3 bump soname again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030727
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 9:56:20 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034048
Bug ID: 2034048
Summary: perl-GD for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-GD
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
Reporter:
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> > release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 07:40:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I tried building twice just in case it was a one-off issue but it failed
> the same way with the s390x unable to connect?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80185813
>
> Looks like I'm not the only one either:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031816
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Hi all.
Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many
changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which
need attention before we can push them in Rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032447
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 19. 12. 21 18:26, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I hope you are having/had a good weekend. I am sending this email in accordance
with the Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy[0].
I created a non-responsive maintainer bug[1] for @ishcherb over two weeks ago
and have not received a
On 19.12.21 15:56, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Now, depending packages seem to be broken. Have ypu pushed the side-tag
incompletely, or does the new tesseract -3 bump soname again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033984
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034031
Bug ID: 2034031
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Image-Size for epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Image-Size
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034027
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2034030
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034030
Bug ID: 2034030
Summary: Add perl-Test-MinimumVersion to EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-MinimumVersion
Assignee:
Hi everyone,
I hope you are having/had a good weekend. I am sending this email in accordance
with the Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy[0].
I created a non-responsive maintainer bug[1] for @ishcherb over two weeks ago
and have not received a response. I am happy to help maintain this package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034027
Bug ID: 2034027
Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTTP-Lite in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Lite
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034026
Bug ID: 2034026
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Jcode in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Jcode
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:39 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 19.12.2021 o 17:05, Michael Cronenworth pisze:
> > On 12/17/21 8:11 PM, Michael Berteaux wrote:
> >> On top of what others said, I add that there is also the
> >> nvidia-settings GUI that does not work on Wayland.
> >>
> >> I
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 6:35:13 AM CST Chen Chen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I recently adopted an orphaned package. There are unwanted commits in a
> branch, and I'd like to reset this branch to be as same as rawhide. How can I
> achieve this?
> It seems force push were not allowed on src.f
W dniu 19.12.2021 o 17:05, Michael Cronenworth pisze:
On 12/17/21 8:11 PM, Michael Berteaux wrote:
On top of what others said, I add that there is also the
nvidia-settings GUI that does not work on Wayland.
I don't use it personally, but other people can use, for example,
application/game
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 21:49 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Sandro Mani wrote on 2021/12/15 20:15:
> >
> > On 15.12.21 11:11, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
> > > Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with
> > > some other
On 12/17/21 8:11 PM, Michael Berteaux wrote:
On top of what others said, I add that there is also the nvidia-settings GUI
that does not work on Wayland.
I don't use it personally, but other people can use, for example,
application/game profiles.
It is also something to consider...
The
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of
> 'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034012
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032425
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032425
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034011
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032425
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031690
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032425
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031819
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032425
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2031819, 2034013, 2034012,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032425
Referenced Bugs:
Now, depending packages seem to be broken. Have ypu pushed the side-tag
incompletely, or does the new tesseract -3 bump soname again?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033984
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033988
Thanks, for answer. I build every day rpm packages from git locally with mock.
...
It might be more efficient to run a shell command in your build
environment to review /var/log/dnf.log, even in a "mock" build
environment, rather than trying to parse out the dependencies directly
b reading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
Bug ID: 2034013
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Without-Module for
EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034012
Bug ID: 2034012
Summary: Please branch and build perl-FileHandle-Fmode for
EPEL-9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-FileHandle-Fmode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034011
Bug ID: 2034011
Summary: Please branch and build perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler for
EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
I tried building twice just in case it was a one-off issue but it failed
the same way with the s390x unable to connect?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80185813
Looks like I'm not the only one either:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10431
Thanks,
Richard
On 19. 12. 21 13:35, Chen Chen wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently adopted an orphaned package. There are unwanted commits in a branch,
and I'd like to reset this branch to be as same as rawhide. How can I achieve
this?
It seems force push were not allowed on src.f . I also do not want to commit a
Sandro Mani wrote on 2021/12/15 20:15:
On 15.12.21 11:11, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other
improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few
hours
Hi everyone,
I recently adopted an orphaned package. There are unwanted commits in a branch,
and I'd like to reset this branch to be as same as rawhide. How can I achieve
this?
It seems force push were not allowed on src.f . I also do not want to commit a
"git revert" on it to avoid "x commits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032874
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033569
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032874
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032874
Referenced Bugs:
On 17. 12. 21 23:26, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi,
Is there interest in supporting parsing Pipfile for build requirements?
Hi. Let me borrow an answer from a similar request somewhere else [1]:
"""Whatever comes out of this, we will probably strive for supporting existing
standards,
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 6:07:10 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
> To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my
> interest and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to
> keep it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033968
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033968
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2031815
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2033968
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033439
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033968
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033968
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032440
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033969
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967
Bug 2033967 depends on bug 2033969, which changed state.
Bug 2033969 Summary: Add perl-JSON-MaybeXS to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033969
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033967
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033969
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033967
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033608
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2033967
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033968
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033967
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033969
Bug ID: 2033969
Summary: Add perl-JSON-MaybeXS to EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-JSON-MaybeXS
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033968
Bug ID: 2033968
Summary: Add perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS to EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967
Bug ID: 2033967
Summary: Add perl-JSON-Any to EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-JSON-Any
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033636
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033663
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031757
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033110
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032672
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211218.0):
ID: 1089747 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
92 matches
Mail list logo
