> On 3 Feb 2022, at 09:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 02. 02. 22 v 21:59 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
>>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:41:16PM +0100, Alain Vigne wrote:
>>> My problem is : I don't know how to debug in the mock environment. (But, I
>>> should persevere: there is always a
Jan 22, 2022 10:07:29 AM Fabio Valentini :
> Hi everybody,
>
> The Rust SIG and I have been waiting for responses from Olivier (FAS:
> olem) for a while. I had noticed that their Rust packages started
> accumulating FTBFS / FTI / release-monitoring bugs, as we get CCd on
> those bugzillas. Accor
Hello all,
I first mentioned a couple of months ago that I would like to retire
from maintaining mathematical packages in Fedora, so that I can focus
on code analysis and formal methods packages. Thank you to those who
responded and took some of those packages from me. I still have quite
a pile
On 2/3/22 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Still the same fallout from that rage quit ...
Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in
maintaining their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned,
so we know where are the
On Thu, Feb 3 2022 at 02:06:19 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
For now, I'll test dropping down to -g0, but even this will be a
temporary solution ta best. (I don't know if that will work or not
yet. Will try now.)
BTW this seems to have worked. I had to drop the debuginfo packages
too, b
> On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after krb5 was
> fixed
> and it builds fine.
>
> See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gssapi/pull-request/4
It looks like it's not the first time that krb5-config causes issues becau
* Michael Catanzaro:
> I have the following i686-only WebKitGTK build failure in rawhide [1]:
>
> ninja: build stopped: stat(lib/libWebCoreGTK.a): Value too large for
> defined data type.
>
> Based on [2], I assume the problem is that either ar or ranlib is not
> built with large file support. Doe
Here’s a question: what if the following was added to stdatomic.h at the end of
the file:
#else
#include_next
#endif // C++23
Since the rest of the file is gated by C++23, this allows C++ programs that
reference this header to have a chance to pick up the Clang one, if it exists.
If Clang isn
Hi,
I have the following i686-only WebKitGTK build failure in rawhide [1]:
ninja: build stopped: stat(lib/libWebCoreGTK.a): Value too large for
defined data type.
Based on [2], I assume the problem is that either ar or ranlib is not
built with large file support. Does this seem correct? Shou
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
>
> I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it picked
> up the update just fine. I didn't think the updates-testing repo was
> mirrored though, but it is very annoying that the mirror sync and the pu
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:22:44PM -, Julien Rische wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Julien Rische. I'm from north-east France.
>
> I joined the Red Hat IdM team last month to take part in the development of
> FreeIPA, especially its Kerberos components. I will be contributing upstream
>
Hi Dan,
thanks for the information! I just found similar statements in the
"List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March" thread, which
I didn't see before sending my previous e-mail. Let's see whether he
replies; if not, I will follow up with a FESCo issue.
FYI: I forgot to CC nim in
On February 3, 2022 6:28:33 PM UTC, Michael Kuhn
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>jetbrains-mono-fonts is scheduled for retirement due to not building
>since Fedora 33. I have opened a PR some time ago, fixing this problem:
>https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jetbrains-mono-fonts/pull-request/2
>However, the mai
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 1:15 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:13:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
> > I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last
> night
> > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I
> am
> > usi
Hi,
jetbrains-mono-fonts is scheduled for retirement due to not building
since Fedora 33. I have opened a PR some time ago, fixing this problem:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jetbrains-mono-fonts/pull-request/2
However, the maintainer seems to be inactive at the moment. I would be
happy to he
On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
No. krb5-libs will miss its notes. But python-gssapi will contain its correct
notes. (Provided python-gssapi links to krb5-libs dynamically. I don't know
whether the notes only record a source package name the ELF file belongs to,
or whether they try to trac
Hi everyone,
My name is Julien Rische. I'm from north-east France.
I joined the Red Hat IdM team last month to take part in the development of
FreeIPA, especially its Kerberos components. I will be contributing upstream
and participating to the maintenance of these packages for Fedora.
I am usin
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >>
> >> Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it?
> >
> > I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution.
> > I'm failing to judge all consequences.
>
> There are
On 02. 02. 22 17:15, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
How do I solve this?
I need to update to a new version of python-gssapi but I cvan't build
it right now.
There is a similar bug against krb5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048909
I guess we need to fix krb5 this way too.
Not "too"
On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Still the same fallout from that rage quit ...
Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in maintaining
their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned, so we know where
are the problematic packages before we have p
On 03. 02. 22 15:53, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
the koji build of Carla-2.4.1-4.fc35.src.rpm [1] fails for F35[2] and rawhide
[3]
DEBUG util.py:444: No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns:
local, spacewalk, versionlock
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'f
On 2/3/22 16:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 02. 22 16:06, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:32 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello Fesco
As the branching of f36 get close, java had to fall to troubles.
After the last GCC mass rebuild, jdk11 is no longer buildable on i686.
We had a pat
On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it?
I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution.
I'm failing to judge all consequences.
There are some obstacles. It might not be just gcc that needs tagging in. It's
proba
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 16:22 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:26:09AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weim
V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:26:09AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> > > >
> > > > > T
Hi list,
tl;dr: Why is the Fedora ID server using HTTP communication by default?
Some context:
I was debugging a login process for the www.softwarecollections.org
website, which utilizes Fedora ID. After pulling my hair for a bit,
it turned out that the somewhere along the network road,
any un-e
Beginning next week, the Fedora Prioritized Bugs meetings will be held
on alternate Wednesdays at 10:00 AM US/Eastern (currently 1500 UTC)[1]
in #fedora-meeting-1. This is one hour earlier than the previous time.
For more information on the Prioritized Bugs process, see the docs[2].
[1] https://ca
Hi Jonathan-
The issue isn’t the variable, really, it’s the functions that are
used in the macros. I ran a scratch build on koji so you can see the
errors in question:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82338440
The build log shows the issue when trying to build block.cpp wh
Hi,
the koji build of Carla-2.4.1-4.fc35.src.rpm [1] fails for F35[2] and rawhide
[3]
DEBUG util.py:444: No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns:
local, spacewalk, versionlock
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'freetype-devel(x86-32)'
DEBUG util.py:444: No
On 03/02/2022 15:15, Petr Pisar wrote:
You can disable embedding the package notes by undefining _package_note_file
This is not a fix. Package notes implementation should not touch linker
flags.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 15:15 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> > >
> > > > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> > > > s
V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >
> > > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> > > simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> > simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it
> > strips ELF files and builds debuginfo. Why wasn't the addition of
>
V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:13:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
> I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last night
> (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I am
> using the DNF line it gives me but seeing this string instead:
>
I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last night
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I am
using the DNF line it gives me but seeing this string instead:
$ sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e
La
Eh, i missed this time due Nvidia lag with 510 driver update. But rpm fusion
folks already built [1] it so i hope it will appears in repos very soon.
[1]: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21262
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On 03. 02. 22 10:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:56:32PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Ope
Hey All,
This has been the best Kernel Test Week[0] ever!
Here's the TLDR
Total tests run: 510
Total testers: 143
Non x86 tests: 40
Non x86 testers: 8
Scaling up and retaining contributors has always been a goal for the
Fedora QA community.
This success is credited to the strong community and we
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220202.0):
ID: 1118617 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dne 02. 02. 22 v 21:59 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:41:16PM +0100, Alain Vigne wrote:
My problem is : I don't know how to debug in the mock environment. (But, I
should persevere: there is always a solution, you proved it to me ;)
Try `mock shell`.
I think th
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature
> simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it
> strips ELF files and builds debuginfo. Why wasn't the addition of
> package notes done there?
The package notes are in an allocatable
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:56:32PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> = Open Floor =
>
> For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
> report of the agenda items can be found at:
>
> https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting
Is this meeting a good
Some background:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WZKX43VDK4R7BJMA3DEPOHY35RHMGDRX/#O4RK2PKCLU5GD4BTRFARUFOG2W465GS3
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220202.0):
ID: 1118600 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
44 matches
Mail list logo
