On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth
> forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help with Electron and all
> Electron-based applications that come into Fedora.
That would be fine by me. The most obvious applica
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-02-28
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers, 4 proposed Beta freeze
exception issues, and 5 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's
have a review meeting on Monday.
If you ha
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2022-02-28
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's been a while since we met, so let's get together and see where
we're at for Fedora 36 and so on.
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> [...] Springdale provides
> devtoolset-3-elfutils there, and it in some strange way badly
> correlates with the initial Copr build environment (even before
> the rpmbuild process starts). Some python2 module cannot find
> libelf.so.1 ...
I believe wh
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 02:43 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 21:20 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> > > Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > > Second, the alternate Springdale Linux repo
> > > > > http://springdale.princeton.edu/data/springdale/SCL/7/x86_64/ s
> >
On 25/02/2022 19:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from Discourse
or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fedora] epel
* Self-intro glaringgibbon [Fedora] introduc
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from Discourse
or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fedora] epel
* Self-intro glaringgibbon [Fedora] introductions
* It's #FedoraShareYourScreen week
On 2/22/22 19:47, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Denis Fateyev wrote:
>> The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently
>> switched from providing a shared library to a static library.
>
> Generally, you do not want to follow such a change, but force the build
> system t
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220224.0):
ID: 1148427 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1148427
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests comple
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — When running anaconda on Wayland with two keyboard
layouts configured, hitting any modifier key with the second layout
selected switches to the first layout — ASSIGNED
ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
2. anacond
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:41:58AM -0600, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to build my packages for EPEL-9 on my up-to-date F35
> machine using Mock. I checked /etc/mock but can’t find any specific
> epel-9 config so I went with centos-stream+epel-next-9. Okay, fine,
> but when I run the
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:42 PM Ron Olson wrote:
> I guess there was some CPU requirement change that I didn’t catch;
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/01/05/building-red-hat-enterprise-linux-9-for-the-x86-64-v2-microarchitecture-level
discussed the issue(s), and the x86_64 v2 requirement
* Ron Olson:
> I’m trying to build my packages for EPEL-9 on my up-to-date F35
> machine using Mock. I checked /etc/mock but can’t find any specific
> epel-9 config so I went with centos-stream+epel-next-9. Okay, fine,
> but when I run the job, it fails immediately with the error “Fatal
> glibc er
Hey all-
I’m trying to build my packages for EPEL-9 on my up-to-date F35 machine using
Mock. I checked /etc/mock but can’t find any specific epel-9 config so I went
with centos-stream+epel-next-9. Okay, fine, but when I run the job, it fails
immediately with the error “Fatal glibc error: CPU do
Hi, Adam,
I am afraid of not to upload successfully, if that I will wait only.
Thank you very much.
Jun
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williamson
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 3:22 PM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Cc: Miao, Jun
> Subject: Re: How long to up
I was able to rebase unpaper to version 6.1^20220117.gite515408 in Fedora 37
thanks to ffmpeg we now have in a distribution. This new version changed
a license from GPL+ to GPLv2.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220224.n.0):
ID: 1147714 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1147714
ID: 1147755 Test: x86_64 Every
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] built on
> Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build for Fedora
> Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in F
OLD: Fedora-36-20220224.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.32 MiB
Size of
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 10:14 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022, at 6:17 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote:
>
> > network-online-waitonly.target with
> > After=network-online.target
> > StopWhenUnneeded=yes
> >
> > which is then used inside iscsi.service
> > ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/sy
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 07:37:35PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10:
> > V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > > On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc257
> On 25.02.22 11:37, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Apologies, my mistake, upstream uses different library names depending
> on whether you build with autotools or cmake, and when switching to
> cmake I accidentally only provided the compat symlink for the
> unversioned link library, but not for the
On 25. 02. 22 9:51, Akira TAGOH wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
nim: sil-namdhinggo-fonts, yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts, gfs-decker-fonts,
gfs-didot-fonts, gfs-bodoni-fonts, impallari-dancing-script-fonts,
gfs-didot-display-fonts, typesetit-great-vibes-fonts, sil-charis-co
On 25.02.22 11:37, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10:
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawh
Hey,
due to the lack of time I'm orphaning the following set of packages:
augeas-vala
clpeak
gimp-fourier-plugin
gocl
python-uinput
Feel free to step up and take them.
Greetings
- fabian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10:
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawhide
This caused soname change: liblept.so
V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawhide
>
> This caused soname change: liblept.so.5 -> libleptonica.so.5.4.0 , whi
Hello!
Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] built on
Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build for Fedora
Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in Fedora.
My use for Electron is that I want to run signal-desktop [4
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220224.0):
ID: 1147622 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220224.0):
ID: 1147606 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> nim: sil-namdhinggo-fonts, yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts, gfs-decker-fonts,
> gfs-didot-fonts, gfs-bodoni-fonts, impallari-dancing-script-fonts,
> gfs-didot-display-fonts, typesetit-great-vibes-fonts,
> sil-charis-compact-fonts,
> sil-tagmukay-fonts
V Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 04:23:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:22 PM Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
> > On f37 / f36 two days ago libwebsockets was updated from 4.2.2 to 4.3.1
> > which causes unannounced soname bump from libwebsockets.so.18 to
> > libwebsockets.so.19
>
On 2/24/22 16:37, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Did you discuss modularising curl itself upstream?
It was added
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 3:37:56 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > Did you discuss modula
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:58:10 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Did you discuss modularising curl itself upstream?
> >
> > It was added to their
35 matches
Mail list logo
